@satcheluk@KySportsRadio That’s not how it works. They cannot appropriate the intellectual property of the SEC and B1G without their consent. The 75% threshold means it’s a possibility; 75% of FBS cannot subsume the SEC’s intellectual property rights; it is a voluntary option. Read the actual details.
@GovPressOffice The foreign policy of Ben Rhodes and Jake Sullivan was, in fact, appeasement towards Iran, Russia, and China and made the world a much more dangerous place in hindsight. Having this foreign policy viewpoint is not living in reality; dictators only respect hard, not, soft power.
Speaks for itself:
Feb. 25, 2026: “We are not developing long-range missiles… we have limited the range below 2,000 kilometers” — Iran’s FM Araghchi (IRNA).
March 20, 2026: Iran fires missiles at Diego Garcia—ranging 4,000 kilometers (WSJ). ⬇️
@Anglo3000@Webbaste@Ofcom I’m not defending what 4chan posts, I just think they should say why they’re banning them; I think it does a disservice to the doctrine of personal jurisdiction regarding their insistence they can fine them. If they truly believed that, they should serve them via letters rogatory
@Anglo3000@Webbaste@Ofcom You can defend the law all you want; I'm just pointing out the actual motive, which is it's a regulatory scheme under the guise of administrative enforcement of a fine to justify when they eventually ban it. And you know they won't stop with 4chan. They're not subject to UK pj
@Anglo3000@Webbaste@Ofcom Even if the UK passed that law, 4chan isn't subject to that law in the US, Ofcom will just use this as precedent to block them. Regardless of 4chan's questionable content, that's what Ofcom is actually doing. It seems to be a guise for justifying censor-laws on foreign websites.
@Anglo3000@Webbaste@Ofcom No—there’s no specific, personal jurisdiction over the claim in English courts & they won’t bring the action in a US court (their place of general jurisdiction) because they know it’ll fail. A site simply being accessible by Brits isn’t purposely availing oneself of UK law for pj
Marco Rubio could never speak directly to Iranians on Iranian TV yet we welcome this terrorist foreign minister to have all his disinformation direct to Americans on our tv.
Qatar and CCP also give us no reciprocity this is horrible for 🇺🇸
This is a foreign influence op meant to demoralize and destroy America from within.
We would recognize it as such if this was World War II and Tokyo Rose was doing a radio show.
Absolutely no difference.
One of the most disturbing things I’ve experienced since October 7th, is seeing people like @mehdirhasan argue that groups like the Islamic Republic and Hamas are, in fact, the good guys. This level of delusion and brain rot will be studied a thousand years from now.
@UNWatch@volker_turk@UNHumanRights Any organization that elects Iran as human rights chair and then tries to lecture others on morality deserves to go the way of League of Nations 😂😂😭