@Charteddaily Which just illustrates the utter irrelevance of the target, since the bulk of the increase presumably reflects simply rising global gold prices which I suspect not even Shane Jones would attempt to claim credit for.
@Abhas7654321@YouTube For NZ, exports could easily double from the current low base. For India, not as much because the NZ market is small and didn't have high tariffs to begin with.
Chatting India FTA 'controversies' - investment, tariff clawbacks, visas and a gratuitous comment about Liz Hurley
Coalition parties trade blows over India agreement | Focus on Politics https://t.co/N55BTQYpw9 via @YouTube
4. FTAs are always compromises, esp when you're a small ecy seeking concessions from a huge one that isn't a fan of free trade, doesn't need an FTA & holds all the cards. Keen to know what WP would have done differently - what would he have foregone to uphold NZ 'values'?
4/4
Once more for the hard of hearing:
1. Obligation is to "promote investment", not achieve the target. If we don't promote it hard enough, then after 18 yrs & a lot of process India *could* temp reimpose tariffs. Exactly $0 of duties saved in that 18 yrs will be clawed back. 1/4
One year after Liberation Day, the evidence does not support the administration’s core claims.
Tariffs weren't reciprocal, didn't produce an investment surge, generated less revenue than projected, didn't pay down the national debt, and pushed prices up. https://t.co/SPmOVeLhJS
@NewYorkNixon@JamieWall2 Perhaps we should trial a reduced role for the TMO that would have prevented this... but that would be one of the stupid SRP law innovations that are so detested oop North 😉
NZ is named amongst 60 countries to be investigated. More tariff uncertainty awaits. Sigh.
But it's a big [yuuuge] stretch to say NZ's lack of a ban on forced labour imports burdens or restricts US commerce in any material sense.
Here's why (non-legal take)... brief🧵
1/5
Ambassador Greer launched Section 301 investigations into acts, policies, and practices of 60 economies to determine whether foreign governments have taken sufficient steps to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor.
Learn more: https://t.co/E8HBZYZcyV
NZ has an opp to present its case and I know we'll do so v strongly. So no need to panic yet.
But consideration of some deal, or signs of movement towards more stringent measures on forced labour, may be required, regardless of the lack of economic logic here.
5/5
US has never raised this as a concern for NZ in its annual 'National Trade Estimates' doc where it lists trade/reg beefs with each country. And it's usually not shy in flagging gripes, no matter their merits. So this is a very novel line of attack. Grasping at straws?
4/5