@devorydarkins Evil, not good, thrives when opposites "raising hell" and "razing hell" are either undistinguished by foolish observers or undistinguishable because of foolish actors.
Enforce "law and equity" (US Const Art 3, Sec 2, Cl 1) with minimal harm.
The purpose for the move might coincide with my long-time concern and question:
Is it bad that anyone calls the District of Columbia their home? It's federal property; dangerously critical decisions and resources are intended to occur/be there (waiting for Virginia to complete the square).
The responsibilities of federal government might be hindered by civilian residency. It's both bad and good to โbe in government's faceโ, so to speak.
I'm still trying to determine the best balance while fearing that a rambunctious mob of residents and guests might interfere with government functions needed to save the entire nation or world. I do not like the fact that D.C. has a local government with its own police, courts, licensing, mayor, public schools, taxing, .... As much as I believe, as did our founders, that a nation must be able to replace its government, a civilian establishment in D.C. very much does not seem correct.
Illegitimacy breeds illegitimacy.
As with slavery and Abraham Lincoln, it appears the person in the executive position must declare that Obama never became President and it is for the simplest of reasons, Obama not only did not provide proofs of eligibility; he didn't even try.
Proving this is also the easiest of proofs: Ask the Electors. We don't even need the Electors to testify: We know the Electors were unable to certify their votes because it was worldwide news that Obama claimed after "... the beginning of the term of the President ..." that he had provided his birth certificate. Amendment 20 Sec 3 middle clause is very clear, just as slavery was illegitimate.
United States legitimacy waits for Trump to be a Lincoln and for his immense apologies for aiding and abetting the ultimate enemy and illegitimacy, as if our Constitution had surrendered its highest Office, by treating the enemy usurper as if he had become our President and the Commander-in-Chief of millions of U.S. citizens who took an oath to "... support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic ..." and "... bear true faith and allegiance to the same .... So help me God."
What happens to those who aid and abet much less than usurpation of the Office of Commander-in-Chief, defend that level of insurrection by rewarding that level of enemy with the label of our Constitution's highest Office, or put our military, citizens, future, and freedom in the line of fire?
Hey, congressional traitors, what would you do to any member of the military who did what you did or do what you do in this matter?
To all those in Federal, State, and Local government, does the shedding of someone else's blood to defend your Constitution mean nothing but your personal benefit in the Office created or sustained by that same Constitution?
@GavinNewsom Everything you say is true and I am sure you're the one we can trust to solve these problems. ๐
What would your career be if there were no such thing as a government Office?
'Political' is an arbitrary descriptive inserted to devalue a moral concern (and probably any concern).
If one said that "doing whatever makes you happy" (taught in media) were a harmful principle, then those intending to destroy respectful environments would distract from and try to discredit the concern by claiming that one were insincere or had an alterior interest, such as being motivated by vain aspirations for government power.
Don't fall into the ad hominem fallacy. Force reasoning, not irrelevance.
The name, Rawling, is practically synonymous with massive, media influence. Our enemies need her on their team.
Humans must recognize that they have an ever-present seed/tendency/vulnerability/gullibility to destroy themselves and others, even while thinking it logical and 'good' to do so, and are ready to do anything (slavery, self-mutilation, lowering the quality of other lives - even those of their 'loved' ones) during their few days of life, unless others, who would happen to be in the mode of reasoning rather than sociopatholical selfishness, had stopped them.
Understanding our flaws will bring US to the US Constitution's judicial system ("law AND equity"), not the injustice we have endured despite the solution's having become the law of the land, and a humble acceptance that humans need the constraints of morals, the best of counsel, and the humility to listen even to the advice of those we consider children and hypocrits, as we all can be.
In the search for righteousness that exalts a nation, "Let God be true, but every man a liar" (Romans 3:4).
Our Declaration of Independence recognized government's necessity in the protection of morality: "He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good" (Declaration of Independence).
@atensnut The mother of all scandals remains to be illegitimacy in the occupation and usurpation of the Office of the President of the United States, not the symptom that were alleged executive orders from an illegitimate occupier, all starting in the relevant actions of 2008.
@DevanaUkraine@MedvedevRussiaE Thank you for teaching what should be the obvious. Evil thrives on permission (e.g., U.S.' suicidal irresolution in Vietnam). Even more shameful is that evil is often spawned by the shortsightedness of human ignorance, greed, and cowardice long before any feasibility of threat.
I guess the U.S. could $ave even more by removing history, even its own, from education 'cuz most uh dem we forz ta trust ne'er went'a class enywayz no how.
Weez shud'a juz bin Putin r lasst dollaz inta lernin how t' hayid frum meaneez 'n ne'er tayke 'nee chanz uh upzettin enee booleez 'cuz booleez mite hert sumwon.
What would be your advice to Abraham Lincoln, who knew he himself would likely die for fighting against the self-perpetuating, murderous attitudes of ad hoc entitlement to and disentitlement of natural-born freedom?
While factors vary in every decision, even the likelihood of complete failure in some must neither override nor outweigh in the need to commit completely
Have you joined the crowd of distant spectators who easily step on the newly homeless family while helping the thief complete his 'harmless, limited-scoped project' or are you the human who would make anyone within a light-year completely regret and fear the mention of, participation in, approval of, or slightest accommodation of any such 'project'.