@ApoloGeniuss@MasterMaliq Multiple people have replied to you with the verse. If you had any sense of honesty, you’d delete your post now that it has been proven false.
@dirtycityrat When people say low-crime, they mean that your chance of being a victim of crime by a stranger is lower in suburbs. Domestic abuse doesn’t count because that can happen wherever.
@denimneverdies Morality either comes from God, or it doesn’t. If it does come from God, then it’s not psychopathic to follow his command. If it doesn’t come from God, then you as an atheist need to explain why it is objectively wrong to “rape” dead animals.
@Jarv114@ProjectAncap Food insecurity is a made-up concept by libtards. The starvation death rate in the US is basically zero, due to welfare. I’m all for cutting 99% of welfare spending, but we still do need a small amount to feed people who cannot feed themselves, like children and cripples.
@jvgraz@GKsMustache “if you remove the premise from an argument, then that argument doesn’t work anymore!” Wow what a great insight Einstein. The premise is “everything that begins to exist has a cause.” If you disagree with the premise, then verbalize why you disagree with it.
@balbecdaze@kamikazecash@idobadtakes Are you American? In the US, 40 minutes isn’t considered a long drive at all. The threshold for a long trip over here is usually if the drive takes more than 1-2 hours.
@jvgraz@GKsMustache Well it wasn’t part of the argument to begin with, so there’s nothing to remove. In fact the argument doesn’t mention God. It simply leads you to a singular uncaused, eternal, uniformly composed entity that possesses free will. This just happens to overlap perfectly with God.
@jvgraz@GKsMustache There is a precise definition of “begin” used by al-Ghazali and Craig. If you disagree with that definition, then propose a better one. Even then, if you still disagree then refer to Avicenna’s version of this argument, which doesn’t even require the premise of things beginning.