@NotLikeMonopoly@anon_opin Well - I’m glad we’ve squared it away, legally; but as you’ve pointed out yourself - morally there might also have been consequences. but, no. I just hope the car man’s no claims wasn’t affected.
@NotLikeMonopoly@anon_opin You give money to someone.. (and then you missed a bit) who openly planned to overdose.
But sure, ‘it’s up to them what they do with it’.
The bit where he lobbed a cactus through a car window and didn’t get his head caved in, was realistic too.
@bradzk11@Dantheman88_ @ImaiSakurajima @PopBase That’s an easy excuse. You think Liam and Noel have NO Input whatsoever, like puppets being told what to do, with no business decisions?
Robert smith knew all about it last year, when the cure had the same issue.
The artist is fully aware.
@0121jw@stephcarroll188 @ThisLadyyyy @oasis@TicketmasterUK@Twickets This is a stadium tour in 2024/25
The idea that none of this comes up in any conversation, legally or otherwise with the Oasis team is frankly, laughable. They’re not running a lemonade stand.
Again - it’s an option the band knows about.
@0121jw@stephcarroll188 @ThisLadyyyy @oasis@TicketmasterUK@Twickets Yep - dynamic pricing is an option the Artist/Band can choose to switch off. Added fees are more difficult.
Just search the Robert Smith posts regarding this, from last year.
@oasis@TicketmasterUK@Twickets Don’t forget, (as per Robert Smith last year) - Dynamic pricing is done with the Band’s consent, it’s not something that ‘has’ to be done.
@mickmuldoon @ItsJohnRain It was more.. why does Adam Ant get 1 song but ‘the rats’ get the full time slot.
The spurious reasoning of Geldof.
Just one example.. you seem to be the one really getting obsessed with it.