John Stone

[John Stone @JohnStone32]

@MichelleDewbs @darrenpjones Because they think it is virtuous to lie. Every time they lie they prove to themselves their own worth, and their sound judgment about the public good. Even when they are relatively nice people like Darren Jones.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

TERMINATE Fauci's pardon & put him in prison.

NEW STUDY CONFIRMS: Fauci used FAKE PCR tests that prove 86% of ‘COVID cases’ were NOT real.

He TERRORIZED the World into taking deadly ‘Vaccines.’

His ‘Pandemic’ was entirely MANUFACTURED.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Oh. My. God.

Look at what these Biolabs were MANUFACTURING…

Anthrax, Tularaemia, Tuberculosis, Swine Fever, New Castles Disease, MERS, SARS, Marburg and Ebola

THERE MUST BE ARRESTS

[John Stone @JohnStone32]

@Nigel_Farage This reads like AI and has a terrible gaffe regarding Henry Nowak

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

The most advanced AI is now "too dangerous" for the public to use.
Too dangerous for independent scientists. For small labs. For you.
But safe for government and its approved partners.
The same government that funded gain-of-function research and hid it.
🧵

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The BBC Has Ruled. Brexit Damaged The Economy. No Further Debate Required.

The BBC's editorial complaints unit has decided that the negative economic impact of Brexit is now a settled fact. Not a contested judgement. Not one side of a live debate. A fact, in the same category as man-made climate change, requiring no balancing view.

The ruling followed a Radio 4 Today programme segment featuring Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, alongside Liam Byrne and Sir John Gieve, both long-standing advocates of closer EU alignment. All three agreed Brexit had damaged growth. The presenter, Katya Adler, did not challenge the premise or introduce a dissenting voice. A complaint followed.

The ECU's response is the revealing part. It acknowledged the segment failed to "acknowledge the alternative case" for pursuing opportunities outside the EU rather than realignment with it. That part of the complaint was upheld. But the central complaint, that three pro-EU voices agreeing with each other on air is not balance, was dismissed. The reasoning given was that this reflected "the consensus among economists" and there was no "significant body of economic opinion" on the other side.

This is worth pausing on. The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist. The institution that is legally required to be impartial has ruled itself the arbiter of which questions are still open and which are closed, and Brexit has just been moved into the closed file.

The economics itself does not support the certainty on display. The headline figure driving much of this narrative, an 8 per cent hit to GDP since 2016, comes from an NBER paper built on a "synthetic control" model that constructs a hypothetical non-Brexit Britain from a basket of comparator countries. The largest weighting in that basket, over 60 per cent, is the United States, a country currently riding an AI investment boom and a separate fiscal stimulus. The model also weights Estonia and Greece more heavily than France or Germany. On a straightforward per capita basis against France and Germany, the actual comparators, Britain's performance since 2016 sits roughly in line with both. An 8 per cent gap simply isn't visible. This is a model producing a number that then gets reported as "the consensus," which the BBC then cites as the reason no alternative view is required.

That loop, model produces number, number becomes consensus, consensus becomes fact, fact requires no balance, is the mechanism. It does not require a conspiracy. It requires an institution that has decided which conclusions are respectable and which are not, and which then treats its own prior decision as evidence.

The same posture has been on display all week. A government department can decide its diversity targets are lawful without seeking legal advice to check. A police force can decide a book about dismantling "inner white supremacy" is leadership training. A broadcaster can decide an economic question is closed and that deciding so does not breach its own impartiality rules. In each case, the institution marks its own homework, and the mark is always a pass.

None of this requires Brexit to have been a triumph. Britain's economy has genuine problems, most of them unrelated to single market membership. But a state broadcaster, funded by compulsory licence fee under threat of prosecution, has now formally placed one of the most consequential political decisions in modern British history beyond the reach of its own impartiality obligations. Reform's Lee Anderson called it being "blinkered by groupthink." The more precise description is an institution that has stopped being able to tell the difference between its own assumptions and the facts.

"The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist."

[Jikkyleaks 🐭 @Jikkyleaks]

Collins should be prosecuted for this, on multiple levels.

[John Stone @JohnStone32]

@thackerpd BTW does anyone recall Joseph Moshe @Jikkyleaks @sayerjigmi @JeffereyJaxen
https://t.co/tEyDVfDWsq

[John Stone @JohnStone32]

@Jikkyleaks @JeffereyJaxen Q from my submission to the UK gov’s Covid inquiry 2022:
“Why we accepted the word of Chinese officials about the genetic sequence of the virus, and why so many vaccine designers/companies were instantly confident of the products they were designing?” https://t.co/JXGa7Ed0Od

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

There has only ever been a single randomised control trial to measure the benefit of folic acid in low risk women.

For every neural tube defect 'prevented', nine babies died (mostly miscarriages).

It was then declared 'unethical' to research further...

https://t.co/E8d6p3sNyd

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

A Warning from History

A republic, a kingdom, a nation - whatever name a people want to give it, rests ultimately upon one thing and that is, trust.

Not trust that every institution is perfect and not trust that every official is right, but trust that the law is applied honestly, fairly, and without fear or favour.

When the public begin to lose that trust, something dangerous occurs.

People stop asking, "What does the evidence show?" And instead, begin asking, "Who is really being protected?"

Once that transition takes hold, every silence becomes suspicious. Every inconsistency becomes magnified. Every unanswered question becomes a story in itself.

Institutions collapse when confidence in them drains away from within.

The greatest danger to British policing is not criticism - It is the growing perception among increasing numbers of ordinary people that criticism is no longer capable of producing accountability.

If that perception continues to spread, as it certainly appears to be, the consequences will extend far beyond policing.

When public confidence departs, authority soon discovers that it cannot compel trust back into existence.

[Aspals Legal @AspalsLegal]

When commentators on this platform revealed the leaked intel on these biolabs, they were childishly dismissed as being in the pay of Russia.

There is an old saying: "In the end the truth will out".

People of integrity, like Tulsi Gabbard, committed to facts, do a huge service to not just America, but to the whole world.

[Jikkyleaks 🐭 @Jikkyleaks]

I call it #Phintel
One big club.
Pharma - Intel agencies - DARPA - US military.
The 4th Reich.
@RMConservative @Fynnderella1 @chrismartenson
@DrJBhattacharya @RWMaloneMD

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

Dr Eric Nepute was sued by the US Gov't for over $500 BILLION, for helping patients & talking about prevention with Vitamin D, Quercetin & Zinc.

Dr Nepute treated over 11,000 patients during Covid - not one died - yet the Biden Administration went after him because they didn’t want prevention or early treatment.

They wanted people funneled into hospitals, given Remdesivir & put on ventilators.

The truth about the medical scams during the pandemic have come out...yet, Dr Nepute is still deplatformed, demonetized, banned, lost millions in legal fees & had to start his life over...all while Fauci, Gates & others increased their wealth by billions with no persecution.

[Paul D. Thacker @thackerpd]

Four days after Collins called for a "devastating takedown" of the three "fringe epidemiologists", the Washington Post's #scicomm writer @JoelAchenbach wrote a story repeating Collin's denigrating jibes.

Achenbach played ardent Fauci fan boy throughout the pandemic.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

Let The Evidence Speak
https://t.co/fakYnBTHz6

[John Stone @JohnStone32]

@toadmeister Nothing will ever retrieve the intellectual insipidity of the modern LDs: they aren’t going to become libertarians again if they ever were. They just pick up their agendas from the WEF etc. You can’t read them a history lesson - they’ll just look at you cluelessly.

[Toby Young @toadmeister]

The Liberal Democrats' intolerance of gender critical campaigners and Christians has rightly landed them in legal hot water and shown that those in charge are no friends of liberty, say David Campanale and Natalie Bird. https://t.co/cXJ2ZWokpQ

[Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® @P_McCulloughMD]

Old military idea of vaccine guns comes back into vaccinology with genetic DNA plasmid shots. https://t.co/7UucuCInVd

[Artur Nadolny @ArturNadol7566]

HE WARNED THEM IN 2014. POLICE ARRIVED IN 2023.

If you came in as an emergency at the Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton and you waited, or you were turned away, or someone you love did not get the care they needed in time, this is why.

The on-call surgeons were treating private patients instead.

A consultant neurosurgeon named James Akinwunmi saw it happening. He also saw colleagues fraudulently billing the NHS for pay they had no right to. He reported all of it.

Rather than act on his concerns, managers launched a disciplinary process against him.

False complaints were submitted to police alleging he had threatened colleagues.

Police took no further action. The trust never told him that.

They then accused him of unauthorised absence during an approved sabbatical and dismissed him in October 2014.

He took them to an employment tribunal. He won.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal finding in 2017.

Then in December 2023, with a live police investigation already running at the hospital, the then-CEO of @UHSussex sent staff an email urging them to have the courage to raise concerns.

Akinwunmi told @guardian the email was laughable. He said whistleblowers including himself had done exactly what the email was encouraging and they were sacked for it.

Operation Bramber, launched by @sussex_police in June 2023, is now a criminal investigation covering over 200 cases of alleged surgical negligence at the same hospital.

More than 90 are being treated as possible manslaughter. The force had to request extra Home Office resources just to cope with the scale of it.

The Care Quality Commission separately downgraded @UHSussex from Outstanding to Requires Improvement. Inspectors found safety concerns had become normalised.

Sources: @guardian @BBCNews @MirrorOnline

@sharmilaxx

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

£2.6 billion of pharma money to unnamed researchers...

That is a LOT of money.

https://t.co/2c8jBCbg6O