Jokeservative

You think you know, but you have no idea.

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@pmarca Do you think this is genuine or he’s in character? Either way, he’s right and he will use videos like this to increase his fame.

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

Welcome back, King.

[Judge Don Willett @JusticeWillett]

One nation in all of human history staked its existence on a single blazing truth: every soul enters this world crowned in God-given rights beyond the reach of any earthly power. 250 years later, America remains the boldest wager ever placed on human liberty. ❤️ 🤍 💙

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@sonofalli Ouch

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@signulll @JohnLeFevre She’s not wrong.

[The All-In Podcast @theallinpod]

David Friedberg: California’s Voting System Looks Fraudulent, But It’s Working Exactly as Designed

@friedberg believes California’s extremely loose election laws enable “appointments” not free elections.

Why? The voting data in LA makes no statistical sense.

“ Pratt's post-election mail-in ballots declined by 1/3.

So statistically, the population of people that send in their ballots late reduced for Pratt by 1/3, increased for Nithya Raman by 80%, and Karen Bass 10% less, if you just look at the mail-in ballots before and after election day as a comparison.

I don't know if there's a sociopolitical way that you can assess those statistics and assume that these are individuals casting their individual vote for who they think should be Mayor of LA.

Basically, the concentration of incremental votes that Nithya Raman got came around the Skid Row area in Los Angeles.

But when you look at the basic statistics of what happened in person, mail-in before, mail-in after Election Day, it becomes a real statistical quagmire on how did this sort of a sociopolitical shift happen in such a way that it did?

Now, there was a report published, and they highlighted the 2018 California midterm elections and the challenges that they saw arise in that midterm election because of some of the legislative changes that were made.

First, California Assembly Bill 1921 legalized the practice of unlimited ballot harvesting in the state. What that means is that any individual in the state of California has the right to go and collect ballots from any other individuals, regardless of relationship, fill them out, and send them in.

California, two years later, 18 months later, also passed a law that made it permanent that every person registered in the state of California would get a ballot, so tens of millions of ballots then get mailed out.

Then there was another series of laws that were passed that said anyone can register to vote. You don't need to prove your citizenship. You can use a gym membership card as an example.

So anyone can register to vote. There is no proof of ID when you get a ballot. There is no demonstration that the person who fills out the ballot has anything to do with the individual who's supposed to be voting that ballot, and it is legal for an individual to go out and collect hundreds or thousands of ballots, ship them in, and they will all qualify in these kind of mail-in ballot voting processes.

So there's nothing illegal or fraudulent going on. In fact, the system is operating exactly as intended.

It has been set up and structured in a way that with the right construct, you can get an individual appointed, not elected, but appointed to a particular role in government under a, quote, ‘free election’ in California.”

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@Aella_Girl Now that’s a domain name!

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@Logikofirst @HabCorpLinguist Lots of in the closet folks, particularly in-house.

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@JohnSobieski83 @helloparalegal Certified @Bangers

[Pope Leo XIV @Pontifex]

Connecting young people to digital networks serves no purpose if they remain disconnected from themselves, others, and their own interiority. We must help young people rediscover silence, reflection, the ability to ask questions, the depth of relationships, and openness to transcendence. To listen to the soul, we must lend an ear, because the soul's voice is not a shout, but a whisper.

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@Aella_Girl Same with “trans women are men” stickers. Can’t get them anymore. Shadow banned.

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@Jason Do you make money if this happens?

[U.S. Department of Justice @TheJusticeDept]

The ABA’s cartel-like control over law school accreditation drives up costs, limits access, and pushes ridiculous ideological mandates over merit.

Ending the Tennessee Supreme Court’s exclusive reliance will expand opportunity AND lower costs.
Great work @USAO_MDTN, @JusticeATR, and @FTC!

[Matt Margolis @ItsMattsLaw]

As someone who has litigated a bunch of elevator claims—don’t do this.

[ib @Indian_Bronson]

Twenty years ago, this would have been a multimillion dollar cross promotional advertisement or something airing during the Super Bowl, worked on for months by extremely talented VFX artists.

[🇺🇸⚽️ Dallin Drescher @SellersCounsel]

This probably doesn’t make sense but part of the trick to being a very good lawyer is training yourself to be extremely OCD with certain things and very noncaring about others

[Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11]

The SPLC is a hate group.

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@SnazzyLabs I feel this way for every device.

[Carrie Severino @JCNSeverino]

Must Watch: Justice Clarence Thomas explains the proper role of a judge and recalls sound advice the late Judge Larry Silberman gave him many years ago:

“When I first became a judge, Judge Larry Silberman...said, ‘Ask yourself before each case: What is my role in this case as a judge?’ Notice how that limits you, not as a person, not as a Catholic, not as a policymaker, not as a husband, as a judge.”

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@SawyerMerritt Why do people keep asking this? They won’t. Do people just want Elon to say that so they can file a lawsuit or what.

[Jokeservative @Jokeservative]

@ericswalwell What allegations are false?