Eugenius B. Jones

Freedom is the oxygen of the soul. - Moshe Dayan

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@Parlayprob @CroLion91 @WhatCome41676 Is that the new name for being carried out to hospital on a stretcher with ur pants full of shit?

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@joekent16jan19 The problem is not in wrong voting. The entire voting system is a scam. Only revolutions bring change. Leaders promising swords and guillotines... Shove that feather up ur ass and smoke it. Tired of organised opposition.

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@HarriersUSA Why don't those FIFA cuuunts show the rest of the 51 cameras, just so we can see if all of them show the same thing... Such an easy piece of evidence, yet repeats of inconclusive film

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@JoePompliano Now do that for Croatia, see how far U will get...

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@signulll Football is by far the most popular event on planet earth... More people in the US watch weekend Premier league matches than NFL or NBA... Sure, the bane of commercialism will reach us too, fucken American disease of making money on everything, nothing is sacred

[HEATT @0xHeatt]

Did #Croatia Really Lose?

For the past two days, Portugal vs. Croatia has been one of the world's most talked about sporting events.

Officially, Croatia is going home. But many believe the match was decided behind the VAR room rather than on the pitch. A combination of new sensor technology inside the ball and officials who failed to correctly interpret or apply that data sparked controversy across the football world, overshadowing what could have become one of the greatest World Cup matches in recent history.

The controversy didn't end there. From the penalty awarded to Portugal to two Croatian goals that were ultimately disallowed, a series of highly questionable decisions fueled the debate and left millions of fans believing the match had slipped away from the players and into the hands of officiating.

Yet despite the result, Croatia as a nation has definitely not lost.

If anything, this World Cup has once again reminded the world what Croatia represents.

Support for these phenomenal players and sportsmen came from every corner of the globe. From Japan to Mexico, from USA to South Africa, from Argentina to Norway, football fans, journalists, commentators, analysts, and even football legends overwhelmingly stood behind Croatia. Many concluded that Croatia had been robbed of a deserved victory.

The only greater promotion Croatia could have received by reaching the World Cup final itself.

Once again, this small but proud nation captured the hearts of millions football fans around the world. Once again, Croatian footballers demonstrated the passion, courage, resilience, and belief that have defined them for decades. Time and time again, they prove that their extraordinary achievements are not luck or coincidence, but the result of an unbreakable mentality and exceptional football.

The Croatian national team may be leaving the #FIFAWorldCup

But Croatia leaves with something many nations never achieve: the respect, admiration, and support of millions of football fans around the world 👏👏👏

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@fifamedia The reason the blips are similar is because one is the bounce off the head of Viega and the other the bounce off Pasalic's thigh. There is no low blip because the hair did not register more than a ball scraping off the top of the grass or a player's shirt not tucked in his pants

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@amfetaminolohie Prema Fifinim pravilima kosa se ne racuna kao dodir.

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@FutSheriff Maybe he touched the ball, but with what? A hair follicle does not constitute offside...

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@martindelp @DavidBQ01 @MatthuAsia Dickhead, he said he felt his hair follicle touch the ball, which the rules stipulate is not counted, much like lower arm in offside...

[Matías Acosta Guzmán @MatthuAsia]

ROBO A CROACIA: Errores en física.

Si nos vamos a poner detallistas con el tema de los sensores de las pelotas, de si hubo un mínimo roce y aplicar el reglamento al milímetro, también tenemos que aplicar física al milímetro.

La pelota Trionda usa tecnología de balón conectado con un sensor de movimiento de 500 Hz que da información al VAR sobre movimiento/contactos del balón. Ese sensor no “ve” una cabeza: mide aceleraciones, rotaciones y patrones de movimiento. Por eso, si la pelota pasa muy cerca de una cabeza, puede haber perturbaciones aerodinámicas, vibraciones o ruido mecánico. En principio, eso puede generar una señal pequeña. Que el algoritmo la clasifique como contacto ya es otra cosa.

Si el sensor muestra una señal típica de impacto —pico brusco, alta frecuencia, cambio instantáneo de rotación o trayectoria, sincronizado con la posición de la cabeza—, entonces la anulación es defendible aunque en TV no se vea. Las cámaras tienen parallax, motion blur, pocos frames comparado con el sensor, y un contacto mínimo puede ser invisible.

Si el sensor solo muestra una oscilación ínfima y no hay cambio coherente de trayectoria, ni deformación, ni imagen compatible, ni firma de impacto, entonces NO se debe anular un gol. Ahí se estaría convirtiendo una herramienta probabilística en un oráculo.

A Croacia le anularon un empate tardío tras una revisión del VAR polémica vinculada a una detección marginal del balón. Una cosa es una señal clara de impacto; otra es un “blip” diminuto.

Sobre los árbitros: no necesitan ser físicos, pero sí deberían tener formación suficiente en limitaciones de medición, la cual OBVIAMENTE NO TIENEN. Un árbitro moderno que usa sensores, semiautomático, tracking 3D y VAR debería entender conceptos básicos: margen de error, falso positivo, calibración, umbral, sincronización temporal y diferencia entre dato bruto e interpretación algorítmica. Si no, termina pasando esto: la tecnología deja de asistir al arbitraje y empieza a reemplazar el juicio crítico.

En conclusión, no se ve contacto y el único argumento es “el sensor detectó un roce ínfimo” que, como ya mencioné, por el gráfico se puede ver que está mas relacionada a diferencias de presión en el aire al pasar cerca de una cabeza que por un toque con la misma (si la hubiera tocado se vería un pico muy alto y brusco en la imagen).
Se está usando tecnología muy avanzada con árbitros que no la saben comprender (ni el propio VAR). Ningún físico diría que ese gráfico muestra un toque.

En una jugada decisiva, la carga de la prueba debería ser altísima. Sensor sí, fe ciega en el sensor, NO.

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@ZwebackHD Hair does not count, like lower arm in offside mastermind

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@SayedZeesh Dickhead hair follicle does not count in rules...

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@abosalaharena Dickhead, hair does not count, like lower arm..

[Patriot2929 @Patriot2929x]

Portugal vs Croatia

The decision to disallow Joško Gvardiol’s late equalizer for Croatia against Portugal relies on a fundamentally flawed and contradictory interpretation of the rules of football. The official ruling states that a microscopic sensor spike inside the ball registered a touch from Igor Matanović, constituting a "pass" that put Mario Pašalić offside. This logic falls apart under intense scrutiny when evaluating intent, physics, and the game's established precedents.

1. Completely Clean Initial Onside Positioning

First and foremost, when Ivan Perišić initiated the original ball into the box, every single Croatian player was in a completely legal, onside position. The entire sequence built toward a legitimate scoring play. Stripping away a critical goal based on a microscopic, invisible inflection point later in the sequence violates the spirit of fair play.

2. Contradictory Logic Regarding Intent

The VAR interpretation relies on a paradox. The officials claim that the touch from Portugal defender Renato Veiga was "irrelevant" and a mere deflection because he was not the intended recipient and was oblivious to the ball hitting his back. Yet, they simultaneously label Igor Matanović's headbutt attempt as a "pass" to Mario Pašalić. Matanović was clearly making a direct attempt on goal, not trying to pass. If the referee rules that a player's deliberate intent does not matter for Matanović, they cannot logically turn around and use a lack of intent to excuse Veiga.

3. The Precedent of Defender Liability and the "Block"

Ruling that Renato Veiga's touch was irrelevant directly contradicts basic football rules regarding defensive liability. Consider an identical physical scenario on the pitch: an attacker fires a shot or cross full force at a defender who has his back turned and has no idea the ball is coming. If that ball hits the oblivious defender's back and goes out of bounds over the goal line, the attacking team is awarded a corner kick. The defender is held fully liable for the touch simply by taking up space on the field.

Veiga did not stand in the 18-yard box by happenstance; he placed himself there deliberately to block the path to the net and take up critical space. If the microchip dictates that Matanović's goal attempt counts as a conscious play on the ball, then Veiga's body placement must be counted as a defensive block.

4. A Loose Ball Interception, Not a Pass

Because Matanović's action was a clear attempt to score, the resulting collision with Veiga’s back was a physical block that completely disrupted the ball's original speed and trajectory. Once the ball deflected off a defender who was actively acting as a human shield, the phase of play changed. Mario Pašalić did not receive a calculated, deliberate pass from his teammate; he intercepted a loose ball resulting directly from a defender’s physical block. Therefore, no offside offense occurred, and Joško Gvardiol’s goal should have stood.

#croatia #portugal @FOXSports
@barstoolsports
#fifa #portugalvscroatia
@FIFAWorldCup

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@Deana_HR Croatia is a tournament side. Winning ugly, and squeezing thru, is the secret to success on the big stage... Just a bit of luck, that's all, and we will surprise again...

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@TonciGlavina Ovo je top!!
Jace od The Mediterranean as it once was...
Jednostavno najbolje do sada, cestitke.
Bravo

[Tonči Glavina @TonciGlavina]

🇭🇷 danas promovira jedna od najvećih holivudskih zvijezda, John Malkovich. Ovo je naša originalna hrvatska priča!

🔗🎥: https://t.co/U84Pw1fZuR

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

https://t.co/zvo2OjIXsy

[Eugenius B. Jones @JonesVenatus]

@TomislavHorva20 Srbi su glup i lazljiv narod, I najvecu stetu cine sami sebi. Svakakve izgovore, te ustase, siptari, balije... Svi protiv njih, a Veliku Srbiju im sanjaju i popovi... kao da nitko ne prati tu povijesnu, teritorijalnu megalomaniju? ...