Jose Musetti

josemusetti#4354 on Discord

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

Legit check in me please🙏

[𝗹𝘆𝗼𝗻𝘇 @LyonzGambles]

i have decided to part ways with @Winna I wish them nothing but the best, I thank them for the support and help during my time with them.

I’ll have a announcement soon 🫶🏼

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@xxxmourn @Winna Why are you silent? 🤔 @Winna

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

RT @xxxmourn: This is not me saying it.

https://t.co/liHJljcXfV asked @Winna for the records six days ago, got no response, and went and c…

[ProvablyFair.org @provablyfairorg]

6 days ago we publicly asked @Winna for the records behind player Heyri’s 62 disputed bets.

Winna did not respond.

So we investigated using Winna’s own public systems.

What we found:

-The player was not served Winna’s public Slide. He was served a private, account-gated VIP version that was visually identical on screen.

-The 62 disputed bets cannot be independently verified today. Winna’s public API serves no result, no target and no seeds for any of them. $10.5M of wagers resolve to nothing.

-We found no independently verifiable pre-bet commitment for the VIP build: a fresh server seed every bet, nonce fixed at 0, a client seed tied to a Bitcoin block mined in 2023, and no published commitment chain.

Our conclusion:
On the evidence available to us, the VIP Slide was not provably fair and the disputed bets are not independently verifiable.

We make no claim that any outcome was manipulated.

Our finding is that the implementation did not provide the guarantees provably fair exists to provide.

Full investigation linked below

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@Winna SCAMMER..

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

I was invited into a private, "provably fair" VIP game at a crypto casino (@Winna / https://t.co/HwyrFwejoT) 🚨

I lost $7,299,672 ($7.3M) - 61 of 62 bets.

Then the casino's own owner confirmed, in writing, it was possible to hand me an unfavourable seed pair.

This isn't a callout. It's one fair ask: @Winna, prove the game was provably fair - or refund my money.

Here's all of it 🧵

(Read tweet 11 for technical evidence + context and a suspicious amount of coincidences - Expanded case in Github)

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@Winna Scammer…

https://t.co/Mj3NXIZMaY

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

I was invited into a private, "provably fair" VIP game at a crypto casino (@Winna / https://t.co/HwyrFwejoT) 🚨

I lost $7,299,672 ($7.3M) - 61 of 62 bets.

Then the casino's own owner confirmed, in writing, it was possible to hand me an unfavourable seed pair.

This isn't a callout. It's one fair ask: @Winna, prove the game was provably fair - or refund my money.

Here's all of it 🧵

(Read tweet 11 for technical evidence + context and a suspicious amount of coincidences - Expanded case in Github)

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@Winna Good scam!!!

https://t.co/qC1VSXVeRF

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

I was invited into a private, "provably fair" VIP game at a crypto casino (@Winna / https://t.co/HwyrFwejoT) 🚨

I lost $7,299,672 ($7.3M) - 61 of 62 bets.

Then the casino's own owner confirmed, in writing, it was possible to hand me an unfavourable seed pair.

This isn't a callout. It's one fair ask: @Winna, prove the game was provably fair - or refund my money.

Here's all of it 🧵

(Read tweet 11 for technical evidence + context and a suspicious amount of coincidences - Expanded case in Github)

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@BennySlots11 https://t.co/Mj3NXIZMaY

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

I was invited into a private, "provably fair" VIP game at a crypto casino (@Winna / https://t.co/HwyrFwejoT) 🚨

I lost $7,299,672 ($7.3M) - 61 of 62 bets.

Then the casino's own owner confirmed, in writing, it was possible to hand me an unfavourable seed pair.

This isn't a callout. It's one fair ask: @Winna, prove the game was provably fair - or refund my money.

Here's all of it 🧵

(Read tweet 11 for technical evidence + context and a suspicious amount of coincidences - Expanded case in Github)

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@xxxmourn @Winna @paulwinnacom

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

It has been 72 hours with no explanation, conversation or resolution. Their formal deadline with the regulator is 29 July, so they still have time - I am not claiming they are late.

But to be clear about what actually resolves this:

NOT a generic statement written by lawyers. The one thing that ends it in a day is producing a valid pre-bet commitment for the 62 disputed rounds, and the server-generation logs.

That is checkable, and it is entirely in their hands. Anything that isn't that is avoiding the question.

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@Winna Comment??? WINNA SCAM

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

I was invited into a private, "provably fair" VIP game at a crypto casino (@Winna / https://t.co/HwyrFwejoT) 🚨

I lost $7,299,672 ($7.3M) - 61 of 62 bets.

Then the casino's own owner confirmed, in writing, it was possible to hand me an unfavourable seed pair.

This isn't a callout. It's one fair ask: @Winna, prove the game was provably fair - or refund my money.

Here's all of it 🧵

(Read tweet 11 for technical evidence + context and a suspicious amount of coincidences - Expanded case in Github)

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@Winna ..

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

I was invited into a private, "provably fair" VIP game at a crypto casino (@Winna / https://t.co/HwyrFwejoT) 🚨

I lost $7,299,672 ($7.3M) - 61 of 62 bets.

Then the casino's own owner confirmed, in writing, it was possible to hand me an unfavourable seed pair.

This isn't a callout. It's one fair ask: @Winna, prove the game was provably fair - or refund my money.

Here's all of it 🧵

(Read tweet 11 for technical evidence + context and a suspicious amount of coincidences - Expanded case in Github)

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

Many replies here: "lol you lost $7M, idiot."

Missing the point completely.

I moved $3–10M a day on winna's FAIR games for months - won some, lost plenty, never complained, because I could verify every result myself.

This is about ONE private game I couldn't verify. That's the whole issue.

I'm not posting because I lost. Losing millions in a day was normal for me.

I'm posting because this one game - spun up for me at higher limits the night my fair action ended - removed the safeguards that let you verify it.

Formal complaint now filed with Winna's licensing regulator.

Full technical breakdown, verify it yourself with no account:
https://t.co/XxiqaVACOu
Repo: https://t.co/dWZ6Vb2ix2
----------
To the "why so many losses in a row" crowd:

I played the same way every day for months - targeting 3.5–4x on nearly every bet. On a provably fair game, that pattern means nothing.

On a game with a fixed, already-public client seed and no committed chain, a known target band is all it takes to grind server seeds that land just short. My routine made that trivial.

I'm not saying they hand-picked each spin. I'm saying the game was built so they could, undetectably. That's the opposite of provably fair.

And "RTP is measured over millions of bets, 62 is nothing" - exactly right, and it's the point.

An average over millions can't detect a game steering a handful of $700k bets. That's the entire reason provable fairness works per-bet: so you never have to trust the average. This build didn't let you.

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@Winna Good scammer

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

This is exactly what I asked for.

@provablyfairorg have the same two questions I do, and they've committed to publishing their assessment independently - including if it goes against me.

@Winna: 62 rounds. Bet ID, time, stake, target, result, server seed, and the hash shown before each bet. Your own fairness page says every one of those values exists.

Produce them and I'll accept whatever the assessment says, publicly.

[ProvablyFair.org @provablyfairorg]

Provably fair dispute: @xxxmourn's investigation for player Heyri - who asked us to review his case with @Winna @paulwinnacom

We've only heard one side, so this is an invitation to Winna.

2 issues need answers.

Issue 1: The disputed bets can't be verified, at all. The public bet pages load with no result, no seeds, no fairness details. That page is the whole point of provably fair.

Issue 2: The VIP Slide had no lock on the outcome. Winna's own seed data shows it ran the Limbo formula with the safeguards stripped:

- a fresh operator seed every bet
- no published chain (the seeds connect to nothing)
- nonce stuck at 0
- a client seed fixed to a 2023 Bitcoin block the player couldn't change

The operator's seed alone decided each result, nothing locked it in beforehand.

That's the information we have been given at this stage.

To complete the record, we're asking @Winna to provide all 62 rounds, one row per bet: bet ID, time, stake, player's target, result, server seed, the hash shown before the bet.

Along with any other relevant information they have so we have both sides of the story.

Winna's fairness page confirms every one of these values should exist.

Only a pre bet commitment can prove fairness, but this lets us start a fair assessment of the situation - and we'll publish the outcome independently either way.

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@Winna Casino scam read on @xxxmourn

[Jose Musetti @JoseMusetti]

@xxxmourn @Winna Scam

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

I was invited into a private, "provably fair" VIP game at a crypto casino (@Winna / https://t.co/HwyrFwejoT) 🚨

I lost $7,299,672 ($7.3M) - 61 of 62 bets.

Then the casino's own owner confirmed, in writing, it was possible to hand me an unfavourable seed pair.

This isn't a callout. It's one fair ask: @Winna, prove the game was provably fair - or refund my money.

Here's all of it 🧵

(Read tweet 11 for technical evidence + context and a suspicious amount of coincidences - Expanded case in Github)

[xxxmourn @xxxmourn]

Hello @provablyfairorg

I've got a case for you and you're going to want this one.

Possibly the biggest Originals provably-fair failure anyone's documented - an operator that could pick every single outcome, undetectably.

Costed me roughly ~$10,000,000. ($10M)

The operator has already confirmed the mechanism in writing and everything is documented.

Mind if I DM? 🧵