Jürgen R Galonska

præst - netværker med hjerte & vision… #podcastgenovervejet #citykirkenaarhus #aarhus #Denmark

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Then the lawsuits will keep coming. Should any female patient or member of staff require funding to fight this assault on their legal rights, apply to https://t.co/iyohnrgVZN

[Stacie Gerbers @StacieGerbyo]

WNBA star Sophie Cunningham spoke out against men in women's sports and now the radical left is coming for her.

Let's flood her with support!

[Martina Navratilova @Martina]

BINGO!!!!!!!

[Hananya Naftali @HananyaNaftali]

I support the two-state solution in Spain - a sovereign state for Spain and a sovereign state for the peaceful immigrants who entered their land.

I also call for an immediate ceasefire between the Spanish forces and the peaceful immigrants.

Spain should resolve the conflict peacefully without any harm to civilians.

@sanchezcastejon @desdelamoncloa

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

I'm not a racist. I'm a culturalist

I believe some cultures are superior to others

For example, I prefer cultures that do not encourage wife beating, paedophilia, clitorectomies, stoning and constant inflation of the male ego

I am also aware of the difference between Islamoscepticism and Islamophobia

Notice that hate does not come into this

Only moral preferences

[Andrew Doyle @andrewdoyle_com]

It’s so strange to be living through an era in which a biologist has to write an essay explaining why there are only two sexes.

But here it is anyway. Worth bookmarking for future squabbles with the scientifically illiterate…

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

"Amnesty has moved so far away from their original mission... They are now acting like the types of authoritarian regimes that they have always sought to expose.” -- @iseult, granddaughter of Amnesty founder.

https://t.co/5JTIrpb2AO

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“Men who identify as women may not enjoy being reminded they are not women. They may not like hearing that women don’t want them in our sports, spaces or services. Tough. Their personal sensitivity cannot become the legal standard for the entire country.”

Latest op-ed link 👇

[Kortney 🇺🇸 @KortneyGlavin90]

🚨BREAKING: The first woman to lead the International Olympic Committee has decided to ban transgender women from women's events at the Olympics.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“The longer this continues, the clearer the message: in Australia, a man’s claim to womanhood now outweighs a woman’s right to exclude him. That is not progress. It is institutionalised misogyny dressed up as human rights.”

My latest op-ed. Link 👇

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

I’ve just seen a post from yet another man who thinks my position has shifted since I wrote my 2020 essay about gender identity ideology and the consequent clash of rights https://t.co/pasxBD1Hzl

For the avoidance of doubt, I stand by every word I wrote then. For instance: ‘woman isn’t a costume.’ If it surprises you that I say men don’t become women by wearing make up and dresses, you didn’t understand the essay. I’ve been crystal clear all along that I believe people are free to live and present themselves as the opposite sex if that’s what feels comfortable and authentic TO THEM. This appears to have been interpreted (most often, tellingly, by men) as ‘and it naturally follows that I, as a woman, will validate a man’s belief that he is now, to all intents and purposes, the same sex as me, and I will use only the speech he deems appropriate and will be very careful to protect his sensitive ego, no matter the cost to myself in pretending to believe a falsehood, or the loss of my own rights due to this pretence.’

Dress as you like within normal bounds of situational decency, wear lipstick, sequins and a beard if you want, call yourself whatever you like, have sex with any consenting adult you please: I wish you health, happiness and safety. What you don’t get is the power to compel my speech and belief.

When I call a man a man, I am speaking verifiable truth. It is essential to be able to accurately name sex when discussing fair sport, facilities and services for women and girls and the right of gay people not to be demonised for their same-sex attraction. In years to come, a lot of useful idiots are going to awake to the fact that they’ve been complicit in enormous harm done to women, girls, gay people who stood against the insanity, and some extremely vulnerable young people. I don’t doubt we’ll hear a lot of, ‘I thought I was just being kind.’ Such individuals, especially those in positions of power, should be asked why they never had anything to say about the loud, public, widespread unkindness directed against those who refused to adopt their fashionable, elitist beliefs, eg, the detransitioners being bullied and vilified by former ‘allies’, the whistleblowers who tried to stop an unregulated experiment on troubled children, the women who lost their careers and livelihoods by standing up for all women’s rights.

Some people appear to believe it a worse crime for a woman to call a man a man than for trans activists to call loudly and publicly for the assault and assassination of all women who refuse to bend the knee. I have never wished violence or any other kind of harm on a trans-identified person, but, like many other people who’ve defended women’s and girls’ rights over the past few years, I have received thousands of threats of death, rape and torture. The wilful blindness of those who bleat ‘both sides’ will rightly be judged harshly in times to come.

TL;DR Trans women aren’t women, and if that hurts your feelings, be grateful you live in a society where you are just as free to espouse gender ideology as I am to speak the truth. As Orwell said: ‘Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.’

[Kirralie Smith @KirralieS]

I am ok and I am so grateful for your support.

Just a reminder that no law and no amount of money can ever make a man become a woman.

I will never comply with a lie.

[Kat A 🌸 @SaiKate108]

When is enough enough!

Sall Grover and a lesbian group are both struggling to protect women’s only spaces in court.

Now a Queensland breast feeding expert is being dragged through the Tribunal for saying men can’t breastfeed.

It’s absurd and Sall Grover just received widespread applause when she call for the Human Rights Commission to be abolished.

She is right. It’s stopped protecting human rights and is now pushing ideology.

As she put it - control, alt, delete . Start again.

[Masih Alinejad @AlinejadMasih]

Hey @ZohranMamdani, see the broken brakes. Citi Bikes are falling apart. Maybe fix the things that are actually putting New Yorkers’ lives at risk.

Oh busy trying to arrest Netanyahu? I have the names of the men in Iran executing children and some are headed to New York.

[ICONS @icons_women]

🎾Breaking: No men allowed in women’s professional tennis

The Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) implements sex-screening for all players “to preserve the integrity of women’s professional tennis and maintain fair competition conditions for all players…”

Thank you to tennis stars @Martina @ChrissieEvert and @SabalenkaA for being outspoken advocates of fair sport and equal opportunities for women. 👏👏👏

[Jürgen R Galonska @JrgenRGalonska]

@MikeWingerii Interesting that the bible didn’t do a “reminder” of the sins of David, Moses and so on… but called them hero’s of faith in the New Testament … even after exposing and being honest of their sins in the OT …when do you move on and leave it to God and other people!?! 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Prasad @theprasad_]

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization.

And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover:

1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate.

2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different.

3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years.

4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it.

5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot.

6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved.

7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built.

8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily.

9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house.

10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale.

11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life.

12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot.

13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization.

14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal.

15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives.

16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore?

17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived.

18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be.

19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean.

20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity.

21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do.

I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X.

Want the same results? Book a quick call:
https://t.co/d6EL5aTXa7

[Patrick Lencioni @patricklencioni]

When people talk about trust on a team, they usually mean the wrong kind.

They mean predictive trust, the kind that comes from working with someone long enough that you can guess how they'll behave. It's helpful once in a while, but it has short legs and it keeps you from ever reaching the level of trust that actually builds better teams.

The real value is in vulnerability-based trust. When people can genuinely say "I need help," or "I was wrong," or "you're better at this than I am." It's what allows teams to have healthy conflict and hold each other accountable. I've come to believe it's the core beneath the most important competitive advantage in business.

Want more of that on your team? Have them read The Five Dysfunctions of a Team and take our Online Team Assessment to start building real trust.

The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: https://t.co/QALJRKgvWR
Online Team Assessment: https://t.co/ThXBhNvohC

[Jürgen R Galonska @JrgenRGalonska]

❤️

[Mrs Fox 🕊️ @CaliforniaFrizz]

Spot on 🎯

[Dr. Calum Miller @DrCalumMiller]

A veteran centre-right Finnish MP, former Minister of the Interior, has been denied a visa for travel to the UK because she was convicted of a war crime for quoting the Bible on X.

Our leadership could not be more contemptuous. This is 1984 on steroids.

https://t.co/PL6NoDUra8