Jason Skifstad

Grateful observer and participant. Esse quam videri. President, Green Jay Financial Advisors. Repost does not equal endorsement.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@chad_mizelle @BottomLineFBN Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@theblaze Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@E_Barcohana Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@seanhannity Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@RedWavePress Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@SpeakerJohnson Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@BillMelugin_ Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@ksorbs Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@JonathanTurley Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@robbystarbuck Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@SenTuberville Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@ByronDonalds Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@LindseyGrahamSC Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@HouseGOP Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@StephenM Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@WhiteHouse Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@SenRickScott Harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for any in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security matter.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@SenRickScott Pretty harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for anyone in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security issue.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@SenTomCotton Pretty harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for anyone in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security issue.

[Jason Skifstad @Jskifstad]

@SenRandPaul @SenTedCruz Pretty harsh of Chief Justice Roberts to force a ban on all would-be US visitors who are pregnant, but if that's the way he wants it.... A ban for anyone in 3rd "trimester" is 100% a decision of the Executive branch, and it is simply a security issue.