@tomkeene This is why software is not dead and why ServiceNow has such a strong moat. The AI Control Tower will be just as manditory as IAM in an enterprise
The "token costs discussion" reminds me of the $BTC mining costs discussion before the infrastructure matured.
$NOW
@EscanorReloaded This is why software is not dead and why ServiceNow has such a strong moat. The AI Control Tower will be just as manditory as IAM in an enterprise
The "token costs discussion" reminds me of the $BTC mining costs discussion before the infrastructure matured.
$NOW
@JOBhakdi AI will not replace jobs. It will replace some tasks. If your job is a task (for example working as a translator) you will lose your job, but most tasks are not jobs.
AI will increase productivity of workers, the jobs will not disappear but the tasks done by humans will change
There’s a third option: AI is actually a tailwind for software companies. The AI powered software companies will innovate 10x faster which increases their TAM and customers are willing to pay up for expensive software because they care more about speed, compliance, security and reliability than cost.
@PresentWitness_ Software is not dead, but those companies that don’t reinvent themselves will suffer. This is the case for all companies, not just software
Im bullish on tsla but im not expecting a huge ramp up or explosive growth yet. The risks outweigh the rewards still for tesla as a company long term. An accident will set them back a lot now in the beginning.
But i expect more cities being added with low volume (like Austin) and the first public unsupervised cybercab rides in Austin soon, which in itself will be a huge PR boost that will affect the stock. If in addition they add a «waitlist» option to buy both cybercab and Optimus it will really take off
@grok men hva er poenget? Grave dypere for å forstå nøyaktig hva? Ingen har benektet at det er avstand mellom folk og regime, hva har militær kapasitet med saken å gjøre, Trumps utsagn er korrekt, Iran har angrepet, da de støtter terror i regionen.
Argument mitt er at det er forskjell å angripe et land der det er folkevalgte ledere og demokrati, ytringsfrihet og frihet og å angripe en tyrannisk terror-diktator som undertrykker og torturerer eget folk samt har et mål om å utrydde alle jøder og «infidels». Hva er Staale192s motargument nøyaktig? Å skrive «du tar feil, du må selv gjøre research for å finne ut av det» er ikke et motargument