@Fatima_Khatun01 ^ that value shows the current data transfer rate not the throughput (max speed).
If the person wasn’t actively using a bandwidth intensive app, the bg processes usually do take just a few Kbps.
@VoxSenatus@mohammed_hijab Yea, if that happens - both India & Pakistan would be fighting a fkn US China proxy war
Peak clownery
Hope better sense prevails
@VoxSenatus@mohammed_hijab Regarding the US support - highly doubtful US under trump would actually jump in to help especially with their current stance with Iran and the broader ideology of the current regime
India will quite literally get backed against the wall if this escalates to a full fledged war
@VoxSenatus@mohammed_hijab We’re aligned there ^
Two nuclear states never fight head on, that’s just .. peak stupidity. A clown made that decision.
They’ve been fighting for a while via proxies in Balochistan .. and for nuclear states that’s just the only way! (Army vs army - via proxies)
@VoxSenatus@mohammed_hijab Oh no, I’m not encouraging war
The perpetrators of the Pahlgam attack were stupid f**ks, and the perpetrators of today’s attack on Bahawalpur were stupid f**ks
For the same reason: they targeted civilian sites.
Battles are to be fought between armies
@VoxSenatus@mohammed_hijab in which case, the ‘effectiveness’ of the army matters
India’s army isn’t battle hardened enough tbh
They’re starting something which I honestly don’t think they have the psychological muscle to finish
@VoxSenatus@mohammed_hijab Ideally, there shouldn’t be a war
But if there were, I’d argue that battles aren’t won by numbers alone.
A war isn’t won when the other side’s entire army is wiped out - it’s usually lost when the morale of the nation or the army is obliterated due to the ‘rate’ of damage