Net Zero is the CRIME of the century based on a lie.
Barely useful idiots BBC, Greens, LibDems et al, are champagne socialists, oddballs and sexual perverts.
🚨The BBC now have a climate reporter. This evening i saw a typically overconfident libtard type flailing around dramatically in front of AI graphics. He begins by speaking about the latest scary El Nino, then adds the climate scam $$$ to ramp up the fear. #DefundTheBBC
'Net zero' suicide update: UK climate communists aim to cut emissions by precisely 87% by 2042.
Reality: Even if you believe in the climate hoax (i.e., that emissions cause warming), the UK is less than 1% of global emissions. And 'net zero' suicide is not painless.
https://t.co/EANn17NO6N
@BrknMan@Stephen57908892 No you are embarrassing, your state sponsored AGW cult is almost dead.
Net zero is toast, just wait and see.
Reform will bury it.
Increase in CO2 is very welcome. Likewise temp increase is very welcome.
Most of CO2 increase is natural.
You are inventing a problem that doesn’t exist.
📺☀️ Video of two BBC weather forecasts 19 years apart
1️⃣ 2003 it was warmer than expected this weekend and most of the map yellow /orange.
2️⃣ 2022 nearly the whole map in red.
They didn’t seem to alarm the country back in the day as much when we hit some warmer days.
Don't fall this type of climate alarmism about earth's rotation rate changes. This is a know science, where earth's spin both increases and decreases depending on multiple forcing factors -- which are all described in this well illustrated Javier Vinos book on climate change.
TWO LEADING PRINCETON, MIT SCIENTISTS SAY EPA CLIMATE REGULATIONS BASED ON A ‘HOAX’:
"William Happer, Professor Emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of atmospheric science at MIT:
“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule.
All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data. The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.
Climate models such as the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes.
To illustrate his point, he presented the EPA with a table showing the difference between those models’ predictions and the observed data."
The Epoch Times
I asked a chemical engineer to produce source data regarding his climate alarmist graph , but he only provided a vague summary and then blocked me. Again - climate alarmists only have dogma - and no legitimate supporting data.
@BrknMan You're an outdated left-wing AGW cultist.
The AGW cult is dying fast.
The climate scam is dead in the US. It will die in the UK.
Net zero is on borrowed time.
Enjoy:)
@Stephen57908892