@IndiGo6E & @bookingcom: You sold a 2-stop flight to Zurich but provided a 3-stop journey with an UNDISCLOSED 1-hour layover & AIRCRAFT CHANGE in Jeddah. This is a material breach of contract. Your itinerary proves it was a scheduled transit, not a technical stop. #ConsumerFraud
@IndiGo6E & @bookingcom: You sold a 2-stop flight to Zurich but provided a 3-stop journey with an UNDISCLOSED 1-hour layover & AIRCRAFT CHANGE in Jeddah. This is a material breach of contract. Your itinerary proves it was a scheduled transit, not a technical stop. #ConsumerFraud
@MoCA_GoI@airsewa_MoCA A "change of aircraft" is a scheduled transit, NOT a technical stop. Concealing this at purchase violates your March 2026 Passenger Transparency Guidelines. IndiGo already authorized a "Plan B" refund on 26.04; they are now retracting it. Please re-verify the PDF evidence. 2/2
@MoCA_GoI@MoCA_GoI@AirSewa_MoCA Respectfully, the airline’s "provisions" are based on false data. My official itinerary [Page 2 attached] explicitly states: "01 Hours 00 Mins layover at Jeddah Change of aircraft."
1/2 #AirSewa#PNRUGL6NE
Adding the undeniable evidence from the official @IndiGo6E itinerary. Page 2 explicitly confirms a layover and AIRCRAFT CHANGE in Jeddah. This is NOT a technical stop. @bookingcom mis-sold this as 2 stops. Honor the refund offer! #ConsumerRights#AirSewa
As a Zurich resident, I have filed a formal dispute with @UBS_ch and reported this to the Swiss Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA). I reject the mis-sold itinerary. Honor your refund authorization immediately. #SwissLaw#IndiGo#BookingFraud 3/3
Customer Experience Expert (A. Kandwal) formally offered a "Plan B" full refund for PNR UGL6NE on 26.04.26, which I accepted. Now you are attempting to retract this binding settlement in bad faith. @AirSewa_MoCA@MoCA_GoI please intervene. 2/3
@anchor_protocol Balance on bEth collateral is missing on anchor protocol. 22 Beth + 509 bluna pledged as collateral and took 12,000 ust(approx) as borrow. Balance was fine until 12 May. On 13 May. bETH balance under collateral reduced to 13 but loan amount did not change. Any explanation?