With our new majority, we must:
✅ Deliver bold cost relief
✅ Get big money out of politics
✅ Ban gerrymandering
✅ Pass universal healthcare
✅ Invest in education
✅ Create a pathway to citizenship
✅ Build millions of homes
✅ Regulate AI & data centers
✅ End forever wars
@davidslosttt I’m not ready to write off any of the members of the Glup Shitto (complimentary) Class of 2026. It’s way too early to predict what the environment will be in 2028.
President Trump's response to the American people overwhelmingly voting against rising costs and his corrupt weaponization of the government: promote @StephenM to Chief of Staff and double down on the policies that brought him the loss in the first place. And then have Stephen draft a tweet threatening to put me in jail.
This shouldn’t be controversial: if you break the law or use taxpayer dollars to enrich yourself, you should be held accountable. If you didn’t break the law, then it’s all good.
Mr. President, your threats of legal action and worse didn’t work when you tried to criminally indict me in front of a grand jury last February. Or when you threatened it again last month. If anything, your hair-trigger obsession on the issue of corruption and illegal orders reveals more about you then it does about me.
If you care at all about the American people who sent you such a strong message on Tuesday, you’d be working on plans to end the war with Iran, end the sloppy tariffs, and deal with the impending impact of your healthcare cuts — which take effect on January 1.
The nightmare of the Democrats trying to figure out how logistically manage 290 House seats and 62 Senate seats after two years of Miller running the show drives Trump's approval rating to 23%?
@bdquinn The entire experiment with independent candidates is a worthwhile failure. Glad we tried it, but the way forward is to run Democrats and give them flexibility to do what they need to do to win.
Tech Right sheep, at least you got to spend two years sucking up to a16z, posting “based” and “I voted for this” and giggling like little kids about saying “retarded”
I think political debates about electability would be clearer if people would just admit that they are willing to bear some losses or slimmer margins in pursuit of their policy goals. That's totally reasonable! I am too!
Then we can have a debate about whether those losses are worth it.
For instance -- Dems passed the Civil Rights Act and lost the South. FDR won Assad-level margins in part by eschewing racial liberalism (see: anti-lynching bills). Republicans spent 50 years trying to overturn Roe and paid for it at the ballot box.
The relevant questions are: a) Is what you're losing votes for worth it b) do you lose *so* many votes that you can't even enact policy c) are you spurring a backlash that wipes out gains that you made?
@ImNotOwned My respect for Jeffries and Schumer has gone up, for different reasons. I think it best for Schumer to retire, but we owe him a lot. And Jeffries will have plenty of chances to shine. I feel good!