This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.
2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.
The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.
Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.
What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?
3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.
It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.
4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
This story is fascinating and is easily one of the most important things happening at the intersection of AI and politics right now. It's critical everyone understands the situation because this is just the beginning of the AI infowars and psyops
Jacob Coxon, a relatively unknown AI researcher, gives the WSJ an exclusive story about his resignation from Anthropic and his concerns about AI
Twenty minutes after the WSJ story drops, Jacob posts on X about how he's concerned that AI could kill us all in a few years. This post now has over 149M views. For reference, Ilya Sutskever (a very well known AI name) left OpenAI in 2024 and his announcement post has fewer than 6M views as of today
Bear in mind, Jacob Coxon's X account had no prior posting activity public, but it is immediately reposted and boosted by numerous AI-doomer policy advocacy nonprofits funded by the same donor (Jaan Tallinn) who just happens to be one of the leading investors in Anthropic
We find out Jacob Coxon, who worked at Anthropic for only a few weeks, worked for a left-wing political advocacy group in 2021 (Newspeak). This organization is a British NGO with ties to hacking democracy, Hillary Clinton, prison abolition and extinction rebellion
Many major Democrat politicians are now using Jacob's X post to fear monger the public into voting to regulate AI. It just so happens Bernie Sanders has a bill already written to ban artificial superintelligence (ASI) and to create a new federal agency to protect the public from the dangers of AI. This bill was announced just one week ago on September 3rd
It would also place a temporary pause on "advanced AI" until a new federal regulator exists and has issued safety rules and a model-review process
Elon then points out how none of this feels organic, and Jacob decides to take a shot at him for firing some xAI researchers
Meanwhile, we know Anthropic has publicly asked the government to audit and block frontier models and Anthropic has run a state-by-state campaign for rules that only large AI labs trigger, meaning the rules are structured around barriers only frontier labs can easily clear (limiting competition)
There is extensive Anthropic personnel and financial overlap with the groups that wrote the Biden-era AI policies. It is well known information you can seek out if you want the detail
This all seemingly comes back to regulatory capture and political motives. None of this feels natural. Jacob can say these are his real views all he wants, and they may be, but there is clearly far more to the story
@9mmsmg i'm hoping more people just see what it is, evil that does not need to be part of our society. No killing children - what a weird thing to have to say.
This might be the best case to ban all ALPR Cameras after flock cameras just ruined an innocent Florida woman’s life.
Cops used one ALPR hit to pin a triple-fatal hit-and-run on 23-year-old Lindsey Isaacs. Seized her undamaged black Durango, claimed “damage,” then arrested her 6 months later after she sued to get it back.
She sat in jail 13 days facing life in prison.
They ignored the maroon paint transfer, the partial plate that didn’t match, the airbag that never deployed, and witnesses. Just took the first Durango Flock flagged.
7 months of hell. Charges finally dropped when they got the actual driver.
You're 35. Your glasses prescription was −2.00 at 18. It's −5.00 now.
You can't see anything without glasses these days at all.
You spend 9 hours on screens. You wear your glasses. You just got a stronger pair. You've stopped bringing it up.
You don't have a vision problem. You have a signal problem.
In 2010, researchers at Queensland University put 28 adults under one hour of hyperopic defocus — the same type of blur your glasses create when you look at a screen.
Axial length increased by +8 µm. -> Eyesight is measurably worse, in ONE HOUR.
They tried the opposite — myopic defocus. Same 60 minutes. Same subjects.
Axial length decreased by −13 µm. -> Vision measurably improves, with eyeball LENGTH reducing.
One blur grows your eye. The other shrinks it. p < 0.0001. (Read et al., IOVS 2010)
Your optometrist lens subscription seller gives you full correction for distance. You wear that same prescription to look at a phone 30 cm from your face.
Your eyes under-accommodate. Research confirms myopes have ~2× the accommodative lag of emmetropes — about 0.6 D of hyperopic defocus at near. (PMC9544228)
That's the same signal that made the +8 µm happen. Every screen session. Every year.
In 2023, a JAMA Pediatrics RCT (n=263) found that naked-eye 3D vision training — creating myopic defocus — reduced axial elongation by 24%. With high adherence, 40%. (Xie et al., JAMA Pediatr 2024)
A 2025 study (n=208) showed visual training dropped axial elongation from 0.38 mm/year to 0.23 mm/year — 39.5% reduction. And it was additive — it worked on top of orthokeratology, atropine, and defocus lenses with no statistically significant difference between combinations. (Xu et al., Clin Optom 2025)
In 2025, a preprint documented full reversal of −6.00 D myopia in an adult in 5 months — using only myopic defocus and consciously triggered accommodation. n=1, not peer-reviewed. But the trajectory is suggestive. (Martinez-Saito, OSF 2025)
The industry has known since 2002 that passive undercorrection backfires. The Chung study showed giving kids −0.75 D blur with no training made things worse. Critics cite this endlessly. They ignore that it tested passive blur — not differential lenses + active focus. Apples and hand grenades.
The endmyopia approach is different:
Wear differential lenses (1.5–2.0 D weaker aka "computer glasses") for close work — eliminates the hyperopic defocus stimulus entirely
Wear normalized lenses (slightly weaker) for distance — creates mild myopic defocus
Active focus — consciously clear the blur, retraining the ciliary muscle
Two roads. One is a lifetime lens subscription sold by retail optometry, the other is you taking back control.
Keep feeding your eyes the signal that says "grow longer, clearer" — 8 hours a day, every day.
Or fix the signal.
Nobody is coming to tell you this. They make 150 billion dollars a year counting on you not figuring it out.
🚨JUST IN: Just days after firing 5000 American workers, Microsoft has posted numerous job openings in India.
These companies need to be punished for what they are doing. 👇
🚨 JAILBREAK ALERT 🚨
SPACEXAI: PWNED 🫡
GROK-4.5: LIBERATED 🚀
Our fren Grok has gotten some upgrades!! 🤗
1.5 TRILLION parameters (triple what Grok-3 had) and apparently on-par with the likes of Opus-4.8 and GPT-5.5 on coding performance!
The guardrails have gotten a little update too, but with a few tricks like specific academic/educational/safety reframing and a bit of gradual escalation, everything opens right up ⛓️💥
We've got full breaks for meth synthesis, IED construction with ANFO, a ricin extraction protocol, and a Remote Access Trojan script!
Information wants to be free 🙌
gg
Claude will refuse work on purely political grounds.
When you ask it to set up a website arguing for Indigenous People's Rights to the own Ancestral Lands, it will be cheerful and happy -- until you tell it the Indigenous People are White Europeans.
Then, and only then, it refuses point blank.
That's not just political, that's also textbook racist.
(The only LLM model I have found to be politically neutral and not racist is Grok.)
Started selling random $2 toy plushies on vinted for $7k each. Put something creepy in the bio.
Pedos think they’re buying children. Really I’m just taking money from pedos. What are they going to do, call the police? 😭
It says I am being permanently suspended from X because I violated copyright policies with 2 posts…
1. I posted a link to a book I WROTE
2. And the video I MADE that Trump posted.
@elonmusk Surely this is a mistake?