KazEconomics

A good ruler is efficient, but rare if hereditary. Democracy can work, reliably but only with educated informed voters.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@Independent If he had tested positive for covid in the previous 28 days it would have been that.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@Reuters Just like the virus then, but at $25 / vial plus travel and environmental waste and waste of time.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@labourpress @PreetKGillMP

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@JamesMelville @roshbeth While I'm a remainer that's a little convenient. Sounds more like some crooks invented a disaster and paid themselves 6 million while going on a 1 million road trip.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@benitodevalle The take it back bit. Is it really in there since you need to give honest people a reason to stand for election.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@rogervmorgan 1st step. Beware of false prophets. Likely every one of your usual candidates is in on it.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@youngvulgarian @DrRoyBailey Don't blame wolves for herding sheep.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@Independent Wolf dressed as sheep herding sheep to slaughter says wolves wouldn't herd sheep to slaughter.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@OliverBullough Why bother anyway. Likely Freemason Returning officer appoints all the people sitting with the box and unused ballots off camera apart from candidates (establishment). The marked register is not publicised not that anyone who can't be bothered to vote would check one if it were.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@vote_tc Did anyone who genuinely honest and therefore willing to let you bother to stand? Why would someone honest fight if you let the crooks with the money lie to you?

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@natalieben Then give up the right to just talk. Set the example that fraudsters can't follow. https://t.co/EUxGBHIMm4

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@StephenWoroniec @OccupyLondon @BrunoLatourAIME @ErikSolheim @AChausson @CarolineLucas @MarkTercek @sunrisemvmt @ThisIsZeroHour @PolEcoNet Point being. A tiny % of fair reasonable folk (willing to make a binding commitment to propose and support or oppose at least a few things they promise) bother to stand and the rest don't ask for that upfront. don't blame the wolves for eating the sheep follow blindly.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@StephenWoroniec @OccupyLondon @BrunoLatourAIME @ErikSolheim @AChausson @CarolineLucas @MarkTercek @sunrisemvmt @ThisIsZeroHour @PolEcoNet And yet you have never stood for election having offered something than no decent person should stand without offering. Facts backed by accountability?
https://t.co/EUxGBHIMm4

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@guardian Define left wing. These days that means supporting a tax of land and property with an exemption than modest personal use and punitive level for unregistered beneficial owners, state owned, significant oversight of monopoly / necessity industries such as prisons / railways / NHS

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@FossilFree_UK @GreenKeithMEP @JBrokenshire @claireperrymp Out of a possible about 35750

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@BathLabourParty @Alston_UNSR Our economy is designed with poverty at the bottom. The way the offshore exempt landlords are taxed (or not) is literally set to keep the people busy without triggering violent revolution. We define 'poverty' as % of income spent on housing/energy not spare for fags and biscuits.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@fairlady1111 Logically you are more complicit than you should be.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@TheGreenParty But no empowering of voters to alienate those crooks who lie to steal their votes.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@electoralreform @fairlady1111 You don't actually know who would have won under single transferable vote because people would have voted differently. It would probably have resulted in a house of commons made up of individuals unaffiliated with any party.

[KazEconomics @KazEconomics]

@damian_from @Rachael_Swindon 1. If no one does, will they develop their own technology?
2. Does our tech allow us to spy on them an disable?
3. Without our tech, would we still be willing to torture civilians that don't support our choice of regime?