Kees d'Huy

Account Director National Security #HVHW #speedskating #inlineskating

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@eddllllll 254

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@LaurensKuijper @ajboekestijn Schijf van Vijf (of voorgangers) sinds 1953: veel groente, fruit, volkorenproducten, peulvruchten en matig met vet, suiker en zout. Samenstelling percentages macronutriënten is stabiel gebleven! Verandering betreft de hoeveelheid, duurzaamheid nutriëntbronnen & voedselveiligheid.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@lexhoogduin @ajboekestijn Dit is een sociaal grondrecht (zorgplicht van de overheid). Het geeft burgers geen direct in rechte afdwingbaar individueel recht op bepaalde zorg, maar legt de overheid de verplichting op om actief maatregelen te nemen voor de volksgezondheid.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@lexhoogduin @ajboekestijn Grondwet art.22
1. De overheid treft maatregelen ter bevordering van de volksgezondheid.
2. Bevordering van voldoende woongelegenheid is voorwerp van zorg der overheid.
3. Zij schept voorwaarden voor maatschappelijke en culturele ontplooiing en voor vrijetijdsbesteding.

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

Ongeveer 99% van zonnepaneel kan gerecycled gaan worden. Dan wordt een groeiende berg "afval" ineens een enorme voorraad aan voorheen schaarse grondstof. https://t.co/cIbHnauVFi via @NUnl

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@tanatana5252 To place a cup with an ear

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@eva_eva001 @EndWokeness For Europe that is including intra EU's migration among its 27 member states.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@joyousnoel7 @ns_statmapper @EndWokeness The EU has 453 million inhabitants actually.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@Tammie1808 Er is een Nederlands B1 dame (Nienke Meesters) die nog harder rijdt...

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@Jindo_1307979 511081

[Martien Visser @BM_Visser]

Misschien niet de boodschap die u wilt horen: De jaarlijkse fijnstofemissie door 1 dag vuurwerk is groter dan die van alle verbrandingsmotoren van personenauto's, bedrijfswagens en vrachtwagens samen, in een heel jaar. #grafiekvandedag

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@JosephGidiotis Same here

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@nigelpeters100 Same

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@bjdv @BM_Visser Kijk naar de hoogte van de pieken. Die komen historisch uit op 290 ppm. Inmiddels zitten we gemiddeld op 430 en zijn we op wegbnaar 450ppm in 2035. We hebben CO₂-niveaus in ongeveer 150 jaar met meer dan 140 ppm verhoogd, wat in de natuurlijke cyclus duizenden jaren zou duren.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@InfoKraan @BM_Visser Je kan het ook omdraaien. Zelfs in November komt gedurende elke 24 uur sowieso tenminste de helft van de stroom uit duurzame opwek...

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@Milajoy In the Netherlands USD 9,68 including Tax/VAT.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@basedsexologist @iamyesyouareno For the Netherlands, the vast majority is EU+UK plus Dutch Caribbean (independent countries within the Kingdom of the Netherlands) and its former collonies Suriname and Indonesia. In total 38,6%.

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@BM_Visser Noord-Holland en Zuid-Holland wekken in absolute zin dan wel veel duurzame energie op, maar doen het per hoofd van hun bevolking eigenlijk niet best...

[Kees d'Huy @KeesdHuy]

@BM_Visser Opvallend is dat de provincies met relatief veel wind op land (per capaita) ook relatief veel zonnenergie "oogsten". Zowel in het veld als op het dak.