@BZSchupelius Vor allem nicht nachdem Transaktivisten erstritten haben die OP Pflicht fallen gelassen wird. Dieser Schritt hat Frauenrechte nicht mitbedacht.
https://t.co/m2je3SnXcc
2/2
Das ursprüngliche Transsexuellengesetz erlaubt in ganz wenigen Fällen eine Dokumentenfälschung.
Die Gesetzgeber waren sich darüber im klaren, dass man den Bürgern keine Lüge zumuten darf.
Es ging auch nie darum Transsexuelle zur Transition zu "zwingen". Hier hat die Trans-Lobby mit bösartiger Absicht die Kausalität verdreht.
Der Gesetztgeber hat nicht gesagt Transsexuelle müssen kastriert werden. Er hat gesagt, nur, wenn der Leidensdruck so groß ist, dass jemand sich sogar so stark modifiziert, dass er sein äußeres Erscheinungsbild an das andere Geschlecht angepasst hat, DANN und NUR DANN, kann man der Gesellschaft als große Ausnahme eine Lüge zumuten.
Es gibt kein Menschenrecht, die Menschen über sein Geschlecht zu belügen. Weil es zu Rechtsbrüchen und Widersprüchen auf allen Ebenen führt.
"Die Wahrheit ist den Menschen zumutbar". Sie ist sogar notwendig, wenn ein Staat glaubwürdig sein will.
Keine Lüge in Gesetzen. Auch keine Mitleidslügen.
@BZSchupelius Jetzt haben Ihnen etliche schon verraten, dass man nicht wirklich sein Geschlecht ändern kann.
Ich verrate Ihnen auch, dass ein geänderter Geschlechtseintrag Transfrauen nicht das Recht geben darf in geschützte Frauenräume zu gelangen.
1/2
@Frau_Meier2@Cinemaware123@kueksElm@MISachsenAnhalt Er vergleicht sich mit jemanden der als verfassungsfeindlich eingestuft wurde, nennt die Person aber nicht, so das niemand wissen kann ob nicht mehr vorlag als ein Gedenken.
In 1965, a 17-year-old girl in Sicily was kidnapped, assaulted, and held captive for over a week.
Then her attacker offered her a deal:
Marry him, and everything would be “forgiven.”
At the time, Italian law allowed rapists to avoid punishment if they married their victims.
It was called “reparatory marriage.”
The logic was horrifying:
A woman’s “honor” mattered more than her consent.
If she married the man who violated her, her reputation could supposedly be restored — and the rapist could walk free.
Most women had no real choice.
Families pressured them.
Communities expected obedience.
The law itself encouraged silence.
But Franca Viola said no.
At 17 years old, traumatized and publicly shamed, she refused to marry the man who assaulted her.
That single word changed Italy forever.
Her decision sparked outrage in her town.
Neighbors turned against her family.
Their vineyards and olive groves were burned in retaliation.
But Franca’s father stood beside her and supported her decision to press charges.
In 1966, Franca testified publicly against her attacker in court.
At a time when most victims were expected to stay silent forever, she spoke openly in front of the entire country.
Italy watched in shock.
Her attacker, Filippo Melodia, was convicted and sentenced to prison.
For the first time in Italian history, a woman had publicly rejected “reparatory marriage” and won.
The case became international news.
But the law itself still remained.
For another 15 years, rapists in Italy could technically still escape punishment by marrying their victims.
Then finally, in 1981, Italy abolished the law completely.
And many activists pointed to Franca Viola as the moment the country first began confronting the cruelty of that system.
Years later, Franca married a childhood friend who had stood beside her through everything.
Not because she needed her “honor restored.”
But because she deserved love, dignity, and a life defined by her own choices.
That’s why her story still matters.
Franca Viola wasn’t just resisting one man.
She was resisting an entire culture that treated women’s suffering as something to hide rather than something to fight.
At 17 years old, she stood against her attacker, her community, and even the law itself.
And eventually, the law changed.
Sometimes history moves because powerful people decide to act.
And sometimes history moves because one terrified teenager quietly refuses to surrender.
Registered sex offender Richard Cox exposed himself to women and girls in female locker rooms across Northern Virginia.
Cox argued that he had a right to access female-only facilities based on his "gender identity."
In one case, a mother said she and her 5-year-old daughter saw Cox touching himself while nude in a shower stall with the curtain open.
Arlington County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Lopez DISMISSED the case against Cox after concluding that the statute prohibiting sex offenders from “loitering” within 100 feet of schools and child day programs was too vague.
Während die @Gruene_Bayern mit @KathaSchulze und @post4julia ihren Wählerinnen verkaufen, sie hätten in Bayern einen Erfolg für Frauen eingefahren und es gäbe zukünftig mehr Frauentoiletten bei Veranstaltungen, treibt der bayerische Bauminister Christian Bernreiter mit seinen Kollegen in ganz Deutschland etwas anderes voran: Die Pflicht zur Frauentoilette bei Events soll vollständig gestrichen werden! Zukünftig werden die Toiletten durch Unisextoiletten ersetzt. Sie wollen das nicht? Schreiben Sie JETZT an die Bauminister, die DERZEIT über das Vorhaben abstimmen. Eine Vorlage zum Absenden per Mail mit einem Klick auf der Website von @wasisteine_frau
I am a lesbian woman and I have had enough.
What began as a desperate, necessary riot against police raids on adult gay bars has curdled into something grotesque:
a compulsory public spectacle that demands children as witnesses, lesbians as collateral damage, and material reality as optional.
The flag that once signaled a refusal to be hunted now functions as a loyalty test.
Refuse the test and you are marked.
The original demand was simple and adult....leave us the fuck alone in our bedrooms and our bars.
The current demand is the opposite: watch us, affirm us, restructure language and law and childhood around us, or be destroyed as a bigot.
This is not liberation.
This is a narcissistic supply operation wearing rainbow drag.
In the piece that follows I perform the dissection.
I trace the mutation from Stonewall’s concrete grievance against criminalization to the present carnival of exhibitionism, institutional capture, and boundary violation.
I name the psychological engine...the relentless need for external validation that turns private orientation into public theater and treats dissent as existential threat.
I examine the specific wound inflicted on lesbians: the redefinition of same-sex attraction into a gender-based feeling that conveniently includes males, the pressure to accept the “cotton ceiling” as progressive, and the quiet medicalization of young women who might otherwise have grown into the very lesbians now being erased.
I look at the documented pattern of rapid social influence on adolescent females, the comorbidities the affirmation model refuses to address, and the European evidence reviews that have already begun walking back the experiment on children’s bodies.
This is not a culture war essay.
It is a forensic accounting.
The movement that once fought to de-pathologize homosexuality now re-pathologizes healthy puberty and healthy bodies to sustain its own emotional regulation.
It conscripts minors into adult sexual subcultures under the banner of inclusion and then labels any objection “hate.” It has turned the quiet dignity of loving your own sex into a participation trophy that must be publicly celebrated or else.
If you came here looking for sanitized language or performative balance, you will not find it.
I wrote this because the shame I feel is not for who I love.
The shame is for what has been done in our name and what is still being done to the next generation of girls who might have grown up to love women without apology.
Read it. Or don’t.
But stop pretending the current iteration of this thing still has anything to do with the original demand to be left the fuck alone.
https://t.co/sWm2qHNNi2
@nouripour Unter dieser Flagge wird Gewalt gegen Frauen und Lesben legitimiert und Homosexuelle, Kinder und Jugendliche in ihrer Selbstwahrnehmung verwirrt und chemisch kastriert. Die Progress Pride Flag ist eine Flagge der Unterdrückung.