The Government is coming for ISAs while funding these grants (and this is just a tiny sample!):
£3,676,371 - Equality Diversity and Inclusion Caucus at Heriot-Watt University https://t.co/bc8Tx5PKgK
£1,555,506 - Transforming LGBTIQ+ Asylum Policies: A Multi-Country Cross-Sectoral Approach to Research, Policy, and Advocacy https://t.co/qvCxowyS2s
£1,328,531 - Constructing climate coloniality: Histories, knowledges and materialities of climate adaptation in southern Africa https://t.co/5JdPjb6KYr
£1,327,278 - The Heritage and Future of Indigenous Rights within Settler-Colonial Commonwealth Nations in the Environmental Emergency https://t.co/BbSuppjsIO
£1,189,986 - Gender, Generation and Climate Change (GENERATE): Creative Approaches to Building Inclusive and Climate Resilient Cities in Uganda and Myanmar https://t.co/rtK3z5zr3i
£1,188,320 - Defining Ethnomusicological Action Research through the regeneration of folk singing in England https://t.co/QN3tcDMOFk
£1,183,769 - The Cultural Legacies of the British Empire: Classical Music's Colonial History (1750-1900) https://t.co/LDGn9r4eAH
£1,164,119 - Decolonising Justice: Vernacular Justice Cultures Beyond the Liberal Order https://t.co/cJfheFuofI
£1,014,696 - Resettling the Colonial Lens: Photography and the (re)making of Malaysia's New Villages https://t.co/gSewFpFytR
£939,368 - Decolonising Sexual and Gender Based Violence in Higher Education: Interventions in Theory, Policy and Practice https://t.co/1SVl85qT8G
£903,433 - Towards Indigenous Seed Data Sovereignty for Climate Resilience: Safeguarding Seed and Wild Plant Heritage in Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago https://t.co/dzZRwh0dw6
£810,703 - Gypsies Forging Sustainable Futures: Representing Romani Environmental Knowledge and Practices Through Traditional Metal Artwork and Dance https://t.co/iTmLs3Qn1A
£805,769 - Decolonising the Museum: Digital Repatriation of the Gaidinliu Collection from the UK to India (DiMuse) https://t.co/ZZCIVqGCPR
£781,276 - Making History Months Count: Embedding Gypsy Roma Traveller History Month in the Public History Calendar https://t.co/eZVrOl1K9I
£768,746 - Geographies of Ethnic Diversity and Inequalities (GEDI) https://t.co/tki6HgRAHV
Those who wrote, voted for, and supported the Online Safety Act won't have imagined it would lead to this.
But that's because they misunderstand how seriously platforms take threats of billion pound fines, or executive imprisonment.
In any wavering case, they will now *always* fall on the side of censorship. The risk of leaning on the side of free speech is just too great.
This is what regulators never understand about their rules. Market participants are overwhelmingly likely to *over-interpret* them, because compliance costs are high. No one can afford to have a lawyer look at every single case. So the default becomes to block.
I see this every day with how we have to respond to election period broadcasting restrictions. But it's pervasive across the entire economy.
It's a feature of regulation, not a bug.
Give it a rest.
Nobody on your front bench has ever run a business - you’re all lawyers, trade unionists and charity workers.
An entire front bench which is parasitic to real working people.
It’s no wonder you have utterly failed and everyone hates you.
You treat the money people work for like it’s yours to take and giveaway to whoever will vote for you.
Working people hate you.
Apparently there’s a coordinated media campaign against Zack Polanski.
More like coordinated media for him!
He’s promoted by Novara Media, Politics JOE and The London Economic (owned by the same people), Pod Save the UK, The Canary and The Green Party’s/ Zack Polanski’s own podcast, Bold Politics.
Then he has D listers endorsing him like Carol Vorderman, Narinder Kaur and Femi Oluwole, as well as regime comedian Cody Dahler.
Then there’s social media accounts promoting him, such as Farrukh, Tim Walker, Mukhtar. Quite a few of these!
Oh also Gary Stevenson and Zoe Gardner, NEON’s finest!
This machine has helped a fringe party -Greens - become mainstream. The BBC and Sky News have bought into the idea Polanski is on the rise - which he is now because the propaganda machine works (“ooh maybe he’s good if so many are saying it”).
Why do Governments carry out public consultation when they admit that they are bringing in the legislation ‘whatever the public says’.
That’s the state of our so called democracy.
Can I get £10,000 from the government for say a house deposit for someone who’s worked and paid into the system for 15 years? Work my arse off to afford the bare minimum like many British people. I hate what this country is turning into
Restore Britain’s policy on lockdown is clear. It was the darkest time in recent British history, a time where our freedoms were trampled over all in the name of bent ‘science’.
For some COVID, was a dangerous disease. And the full power of the state should have been deployed to protect those people. The elderly, the vulnerable.
Instead of spending hundreds of billions of closing our economy down, sentencing thousands of young healthy people to death and ruining tens of millions of lives - we should have protected those two groups, the elderly and the vulnerable, with everything that we had.
If we could shut the country down, we could have had protected those in genuine danger. Obviously.
Millions of youngsters had years ripped away from them. Lives destroyed. For what? To avoid getting a nasty cough?
Sweden was right. Tegnell was right. We should have followed their lead.
A Restore Britain Government would take steps to reverse the damage, as much as possible.
All criminal convictions for non-violent breaches of lockdown rules would be overturned and quashed. Nobody will have a criminal record for breaking laws that should have never existed in the first place. Every related fine will be refunded.
Restore Britain MPs will issue a formal statement and apology from Parliament, recognising the damage lockdowns caused to the families, businesses and our society.
The British state got it wrong. We will admit that.
Targeted amendments to existing laws will be passed, making it illegal to suspend basic freedoms without ultra-intensive parliamentary oversight and strict time limits.
Tax breaks to the most affected industries will be implemented - people forget that the damage continues today. Particularly for hospitality. We will help.
We will remove all remaining COVID relics from this country. Every social distancing sign will be torn down, every two metre sticker will be scrubbed away. I detest seeing it all.
An independent commission filled with overseas experts will be established to review all SAGE communications, predictions and data used to justify lockdown. We will ask Anders Tegnell to head that commission. We will release all modelling and all communications, unredacted, and aim to prosecute anyone who deliberately distorted the statistics to push a damaging pro-lockdown agenda.
Restore Britain will launch a full, independent inquiry into the COVID vaccine - how it was approved, and how it was forced on the entire healthy population. How did ministers like Reform’s Zahawi even dare to suggest that children can overrule their parents in order to take the vaccine? It is sick.
The current vaccine compensation scheme will be scrapped, and we will open a new system which speeds up claims, increases the amount paid and has no inbuilt bias. To those people who lost their lives because of the COVID vaccine, and there have been many, the state will properly compensate those families. Properly compensate.
And, for what is worth which is very little, the state will apologise.
Vaccine passports. Sick. Sick. Sick. The most evil policy inflicted on the British people - all supported by Conservative, Reform and Labour politicians.
I didn’t take the COVID vaccine, I felt I didn’t need it. That was my choice. I was prepared to have my life disrupted. Millions of others though felt blackmailed into receiving that jab to go on holiday or whatever else. Anyone involved in the implementation of that scheme should be ashamed of themselves - including many of the politicians in Reform's top team.
State workers who lost their jobs because of vaccine mandates will be properly compensated. What happened to them was wrong, and Restore Britain will fix it.
We will be honest with the British people about what happened in 2020 and 2021.
Lockdown was the biggest scandal of modern times.
Restore Britain will have the courage to finally admit that, and take steps to rectify the vast damage caused.
There is now a serious political party willing to face up to the truth. I hope you consider supporting us.
Let’s get one thing straight before they gaslight you into swallowing this. This is NOT just about “age verification” so kids can’t scroll TikTok.
The under-16s social media ban, and the under-18s VPN ban, is digital verification for everyone; because the only way to enforce it is to make every single person prove their age, prove their identity, and “check in” with the State before accessing the modern internet.
And yes… you already know where it leads.
OneLogin.
A centralised identity system designed to collect your credentials and your biometrics (face, iris, fingerprint) and bind them to a single government account.
This ban is not the end goal.
It is one verification type.
One tiny draconian token.
One single piece of the Digital ID puzzle.
And the equation remains the same:
OneLogin + GOV Wallet = Digital ID.
Age verification will become one token on that wallet, but first, before the wallet is fully normalised, before it’s “rolled out” to every citizen through exclusion and coercion, they’ll do what they always do:
They’ll introduce the gate first.
To access a VPN, a social media site, or even an AI tool, you will be forced to “prove” you are over 16 or 18 — and the proof won’t be a private check, or a local device setting, or a parental control.
It will be a government check.
A government login.
A government permission slip.
You will have to “check in” with GOV OneLogin to access the internet like a normal person — and soon enough a token for this will be issued into the GOV Wallet, just like the proposed BritCard token that has now allegedly been “scrapped.”
This is the same system, the same architecture, the same rollout pattern... just with a different sticker slapped on the front.
And once the token exists, it becomes the default.
Once it becomes the default, it becomes the requirement.
Once it becomes the requirement, it becomes the leash.
Because what they’re building is not an age gate.
It’s a permission gate.
A surveillance gate.
A system where your ability to access platforms, services, information, communication — your ability to exist online — becomes conditional on your compliance with a credential check that is logged, tracked, and centrally controlled.
They will see what you do.
When you do it.
What you search.
What you access.
What you post.
And people will still be saying, with a straight face:
“Well, it’s a good thing under-16s are being banned from social media… they’ll be safer.”
That’s the bait.
Then you hear Starmer say: “How will parents police this alone?”
And notice what he’s really saying.
He is not empowering parents.
He is positioning the government next to parents, granting the State the same “authority” to parent your child, to decide what is healthy, what is harmful, what is permitted, what is “wellbeing,” and what must be restricted.
The same government that has lied to you for years about safety.
The same government that signs away your rights in the name of protection.
The same government that cannot define a woman, cannot secure a border, cannot arrest a p3dophile (rather employs and promotes them), cannot run a hospital — but somehow wants you to believe it can be trusted to police your child’s mind.
And if you think this is going through “proper process,” think again.
A month ago they announced a consultation on the under-16s ban. That consultation is a red herring.
Because Starmer’s little phrase “Fast Track” is just PR language for something much uglier:
Henry VIII powers.
Powers that allow ministers to change legislation without parliamentary scrutiny, without debate, without any democratic friction.
And that means the actual rules — the ones that govern your data, your access, your verification, your wallet, your permissions — will not be written on the floor of the House.
They will be written by an unelected civil servant in a closed room, and rubber-stamped by a Secretary of State.
The consultation is not democracy. It is the hologram of democracy. Designed to make you feel heard while the law is already coded, the architecture already built, and the enforcement mechanism already chosen.
And it gets worse.
Because this ban is being routed through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill; a bill that will receive Royal Assent before the consultation even ends.
So what exactly are you “consulting” on?
A decision that’s already been made.
A system that’s already being implemented.
A lock that’s already being installed on your front door while they ask you what colour you’d like the handle to be.
Then there’s the Unique Identifier for ALL children.
They will sell it as “tracking attendance.”
But it isn’t an attendance system.
It is a digital tether.
A permanent state identifier for your child, designed to follow them across systems, databases, services, education, healthcare, “wellbeing,” behavioural monitoring, and digital permissions.
And once you combine a Unique Identifier with digital tokens, with “digital wellbeing” regulation, with AI-driven scoring, you have built something monstrous:
A system where a child’s “Wellbeing Score” can drop — determined by government-approved metrics, possibly processed by government AI — and the State can remotely revoke their digital tokens.
Effectively deleting their social existence until they comply.
No access.
No platform.
No digital participation.
No “privileges.”
Just compliance.
And here’s the part people are missing:
They are granting themselves the power to amend the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill without proper parliamentary scrutiny and without waiting for the consultation to end.
They are giving the Secretary of State delegated powers to regulate “digital wellbeing” which is a euphemism so broad you could drive an authoritarian regime through it.
They can amend laws at any time.
They can expand definitions at any time.
They can widen the net at any time.
Meaning the Prime Minister and Secretaries of State become the architects and the judges.
The lawmakers and the enforcers.
And Henry VIII powers are named after a tyrant for a reason. Because they were designed for a monarch who forced Parliament to pass laws and accept personal proclamations.
That is the lineage of the power Starmer is dressing up as “Fast Tracking.”
This isn’t safeguarding.
It’s centralisation.
And it doesn’t stop there.
The other legislation being pulled into this system is the Crime and Policing Bill which is progressing as we speak and the Online Safety Act 2023 — both of which contain mechanisms to expand and amend enforcement without passing fresh primary legislation.
Meaning they can tighten the screws without the public ever noticing.
No new “big scary bill.”
No headline.
No national debate.
Just silent regulatory expansion.
A little more coercion.
A little more surveillance.
A little more permissioning.
Until one day you wake up and the internet — the place you work, learn, communicate, bank, shop, organise, speak, and live — requires you to present a government token just to enter.
And you’ll be told it’s normal.
You’ll be told it’s safety.
You’ll be told it’s “for the children.”
This consultation is a farce.
The law is being passed.
Age verification for all will be forced upon us unless we act now, and unless people stop staring at the headline and start seeing the architecture.
This is not even the start of mission creep.
This is another step.
Another spoke.
Another token.
Another gate.
And yes, there are other ways to improve online safety.
Every person over 16 is issued with a National Insurance number.
There are privacy-preserving options.
There are local-device checks.
There are non-centralised approaches.
But that is not the point.
Because the point is not safety.
The point is control.
This is part of the digital gulag.
The panopticon.
A credentialed society where your ability to participate is conditional, permissioned, and revocable... and where the State holds the master key.
Linked below is another important post about the Digital ID stack that everyone needs to understand...
It’s absurd. The logic is completely inverted. They’re saying: "You can’t make decisions about your own data, your own safety online [by banning VPNs etc]… but you can make decisions that shape everyone else’s life and the country’s future."
(If you believe voting is anything more than the illusion of choice)
It’s the kind of policy contradiction that’s both laughable and alarming. It’s like being trusted to drive a bus but not to cross the street safely on your own...
Or at least, that’s what most people will think. Once you see the wider agenda, it’s clear this isn’t just absurd - it’s sinister and all part of their plan...
The government will continue to indoctrinate but remove anything outisde the state sanctioned curriculum until 16 (while placing themselves 'next to parents' with 'equal authority' to 'police' children), then hand them the vote. So you’re too young to protect your own privacy online, but old enough to vote and decide who governs the country. Got it.
What utter hypocrites
Mike Bloomberg, a US Democrat, is running Labour’s mayoral training programme. And that’s just the beginning of acceptable foreign interference.
🚨CHRIS PHILP CHALLENGES KEIR STARMER OVER COURT RECORDS BEING DESTROYED
Labour want to destroy millions of court records including those linked to grooming gangs
The Tories have attempted to BLOCK THIS
Reform must HELP and stop this blatant cover up!
🇺🇸🇪🇺BREAKING: U.S. Justice Department Just Exposed Ursula von der Leyen and the EU for Pressuring Social Media During COVID!
Released documents reveal that Ursula von der Leyen and EU pressured social media platforms to censor COVID and vaccine information, including children’s vaccines, whenever it contradicted the official narrative.
This proves that the EU is deeply corrupted by Big Pharma a perverse, authoritarian system that must be held accountable.
Never forget the Von der Leyen - Albert Bourla (Pfizer) corruption scandal.
The whole world needs to see this!