It's amazing how @amazon processes data. Three reviews with the ratings 4, 5, 5 are graphically represented as 4, 4, 5 and their mean is 4.2 (not 4.3). I wonder if @AWS also works like that?
https://t.co/TGfP5xff6t
TO PDF OR NOT TO PDF?
In September we organized @NeuroLibre Day, and the most provocative lecture came from @dimanovikov
I am a well-known PDF hater, but Dmitry made me question my assumptions and rethink the publishing incentive structure
https://t.co/YEfFjNL1NY
20-30 years ago, Physics could legitimately claim applications within Chem, Mater Sci or Engineering, as its own. Yet these got labeled "too applied", "no new physics here". After spending decades to discover "new states of matter", are they suddenly trying to become relevant?
@dimanovikov For decades, the physics community has put itself above scientists working on applications. But life shows once again that we live in the time of applications, which prompts the re-definition of the incentives for doing physics.
"Signatures of microstructure in gradient-echo and spin-echo signals"
A careful experimental and Monte Carlo validation of R2*(t) by Pippa Storey @NYUImaging, showing there's need for models of magnetic microstructure beyond Gaussian phase approximation
https://t.co/K3bGQ3wQcj
On the virtues of institutional neutrality:
Landmark 1967 Kalven Report @UChicago
"There is no mechanism by which it can reach a collective position without inhibiting that full freedom of dissent on which it thrives."
https://t.co/XR9LLlPD35
A sane discussion about an insanely politicized issue -- by an ex-Caltech provost, an expert in both theoretical and computational physics, and @theNASciences member, @NYU_CUSP Prof Steven Koonin
https://t.co/U94sD1FMdd
How does transverse relaxation rate approaches its long-time asymptote? As for diffusion, it depends on the microscopic disorder type in the sample. Here is a new paper (experiment included) with Alex Ruh, Philipp Emerich, Harald Scherer and @dimanovikov: https://t.co/gTk2sqyqy5
My small contribution to the efforts. Let's all support the editorial resignation by not reviewing new papers in Neuroimage, not accepting editorial roles, and not submitting new papers. @ImagingNeurosci@fmrib_steve
@ImagingNeurosci Thanks for sticking to your convictions! Please make sure you have a decent LaTeX template. Happy to provide input into this as a long-term LaTeX user.
Hear from bio/medical imaging superstars, discuss challenges & synergies, foster collaborations:
July 15-21, 2023 @GordonConf (GRC & GRS) on
𝙏𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙚 𝙈𝙞𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙄𝙢𝙖𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙜
Registration is open, limited to 200 -- apply early!
https://t.co/aR19yg1PvW
New fully-funded PhD position @cardiffuni & @CUBRICcardiff with me, Emiliano Spezi, @kg_foley, i.c.w. @Dee_Kay_Jay & @ChantalTax. Apply👉 https://t.co/m0lRBDiHK6 and be part of our new @IpochResearch Hub in Interdisciplinary Precision Oncology to help our quest to cure cancer!
@Stikov@dimanovikov The original tweet: "Explain what code does". What is that if not a paper? You write comments in the code for simple approaches, but what if there is something really new?