@KraantiKumar सर, आपने बहूत अच्छा वर्णन किया है इधर दुबेजी का. लेकीन मन में बारबार यह सवाल आता है की क्या आखरी दिनो में उन पर हुए me too वाले आरोप सच थे?
@abhijeet_dipke I'd like to ask one question.
You must've read how Janata Party broke in July 1979.U must've seen how Kejri hijacked Anna movt
Last 12 yrs many leaders were lured to leave original party & join bjp.Wht precautions r u going to uphold solidarity & save party fr splitting?
@ManishK27165027 I'd like to ask 3 questions.
Have u read how Janata Party broke in July 1979?
Have u seen how Kejr hijacked Anna movt?
In last 12 yrs many leaders were lured to leave original party & join bjp.Wht precautions r u going to take to uphold solidarity & save party fr splitting?
THIS IS BIG:
A Supreme Court bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan STRONGLY CRITICISED the judgement denying bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. While granting bail to a Kashmiri man who was charged with UAPA, the bench made no hesitation in stating that the order denying bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam was completely WRONG.
The bench said, "We have serious reservations about judgment in Gulfisha Fatima.... The broad reading of Najeeb suggests that the mere passage of time, if it arises from all surrounding circumstances, mechanically entitles an accused to release."
The bench said, "We have no manner of doubt in stating that even under the UAPA, bail is the rule and jail is the exception."
The bench clearly said that the KA Najeeb order was binding on the two-judge bench which denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam.
In Najeeb case, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court had ruled that bail must be given in UAPA cases if the trial is indefinitely delayed. Umar Khalid is in jail for more than 5 years without trial and Sharjeel Imam is in jail for more than 6 years without trial.
The bench which denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam was a two-judge bench. The court clearly said that a two-judge bench can't go against the order of a three-judge bench.
The bench further said, "We make it clear that Najeeb is binding law and entitled to the protection of judicial discipline. It cannot be diluted, circumvented, or disregarded by trial courts, High Courts, or even by benches of lower strength of this Court."
@CJP_2029@ranjona Grt.We've seen wht happened in 1977 & after.The govt came in power took some steps to control inflation, poverty etc. but was unstable & soon collapsed bec of implosion.We've seen Anna movt. Kejri hijacked movt & formed govt.We r disappointed by previous experience bt still 👍2u