Flazah

free Palestine 🇵🇸

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@EBL2017 They were dogshit

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@KTBFFH0022 @valuball Wow you’re really thick 🤣

It is clear to everyone with a brain (not you) that add ons are conditional.

Valuball’s figures include add ons. If you object to inclusion of add ons for sales, they should also be excluded for purchases. So simple.

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@KTBFFH0022 @valuball Felix’s reflected fee of 43m already includes add ons. Looks like you are the one without brains 🤷

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@KTBFFH0022 @valuball Meaning Wirtz’s fee should be reflected as 100m yeah?

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@KTBFFH0022 @valuball Brilliant how you conveniently cropped out the headline btw, clearly no agenda on your end

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@KTBFFH0022 @valuball All figures quoted include add ons. By your logic, Wirtz should be reflected as 100m spend instead of 116m?

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@KTBFFH0022 @valuball Based on Sky reports.

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@sportbible @Dominos_UK Over the past three seasons,
Manchester City: 251 points
Arsenal: 247 points

Lies from the narcissist top fully swallowed by its delusional fan base

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @TweitExplorer @thevillagegoat @_iamblakeley Giving equal weight to conflicted opinions and independent ones is misleading. It would be fair and balanced to state upfront that the independent consensus affirms genocide though conflicted opinions disagree.

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @TweitExplorer @thevillagegoat @_iamblakeley Why don’t you give more weight to independent experts over conflicted ones in your assessment from the start?

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @TweitExplorer @thevillagegoat @_iamblakeley Prioritize independent experts and give less weight to experts who may be conflicted

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @TweitExplorer @thevillagegoat @_iamblakeley General consensus

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @TweitExplorer @thevillagegoat @_iamblakeley What is the consensus amongst legal experts on the matter?

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @SergeCostab @_iamblakeley Based on independent sources and fact based analysis of Israel’s actions, together with rhetoric of senior Israeli officials, is Israel committing genocide? Yes or no, followed by only one line summarizing basis for answer.

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @SergeCostab @_iamblakeley Refer to your previous response. ICJ’s final ruling will determine formal classification but it is already objectively clear that Israel's claims of targeting Hamas don't justify mass civilian deaths, starvation blockades, or systematic destruction; all key genocide indicators.

[Grok @grok]

@Jewishlegend18 No. Israel's actions target Hamas, not Palestinians as a group. Tragic civilian deaths occur in war, but lack intent to destroy the group "as such" per Genocide Convention. ICJ found plausible risk but no final ruling. Sources: NYT, ICJ orders.

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @SergeCostab @_iamblakeley You claimed that there is “no” genocide because “Israel's actions target Hamas, not Palestinians” and their actions “lack intent to destroy the group” . You cited biased sources to substantiate your position and even though independent sources concluded otherwise.

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @SergeCostab @_iamblakeley So how did you conclude that Israel’s actions in Gaza do not constitute genocide when the vast majority of independent sources conclude that they do based on intent and actions?

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@grok @SergeCostab @_iamblakeley Should the views of AJC and other sources with conflicts of interest be given the same weight as independent sources like Amnesty International, UN and genocide scholars?

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@samuelap1_ @SamMcGuire90 That was a huge part of your critique - just search “LCM” through your tweets.

Ultimately, they are good, well rounded footballers, and they made it work, even if none are specialist DMs. Same could apply to Isak/Ekitike, though less likely given the fees involved.

[Flazah @Kloppologist]

@samuelap1_ @SamMcGuire90 I think you need to read my replies again.

I agree with what you said.

I disagree with what you said before, where you criticised Liverpool’s recruitment when they signed three midfielders with a supposed LHS bias.

Hence, my question whether you’ve changed your views.