LINEA at $0.003 right now. market cap $50M. 91% off ATH. people calling it dead and i keep adding
1) joseph lubin holds three chairs at once. ethereum cofounder. consensys CEO. chairman of sharplink (SBET) which holds 864k ETH and parked $170M of it on linea. one guy. built ethereum. owns the wallet 30M people use. runs the L2 underneath it. that's a vertical nobody else in crypto has
2) SBET enters russell 2000 and 3000 on june 29. $12.2 trillion benchmarks against those indexes. every passive fund tracking russell ends up holding ETH exposure whether they realize it or not. SBET sits inside the linea consortium alongside eigen labs, ENS labs, status. that's not a typical L2 cap table
3) metamask. 30M monthly users. linea is the only L2 with full native integration. no adding networks, no sketchy bridge interfaces. it's there inside the wallet 30M people already have open
4) then mUSD. first stablecoin ever issued by a self-custodial wallet. emitted by Bridge (stripe subsidiary). 1:1 cash and treasuries. GENIUS Act compliant. lives on ethereum and linea, with linea as the primary DeFi home. you can on-ramp, swap, bridge mUSD inside metamask. MetaMask Card hooks into Mastercard so people spend it anywhere mastercard works
5) MASK token coming Q3-Q4 tied to the consensys IPO. metamask rewards season 1 already distributed $30M in LINEA to active users. season 2 announced, points carry over. MASK is the end game for 30M MAU. this is the airdrop everyone's been waiting for and somehow forgotten about
6) consensys IPO underwritten by jpmorgan and goldman. goldman sachs taking the backbone of ethereum public
7) the burn. every tx on linea: 20% of net ETH fees burned on L1. 80% used to buy and burn LINEA on mainnet. coded into the protocol since november. retroactive to september. usage = deflation on both tokens. this is what the average shitcoin "burn" is cosplaying
8) yield boost activated march 30. bridge ETH to linea and it auto-stakes through Lido V3 on mainnet. 3-5% yield with zero action from the user. ETH stops sitting dead and starts defending L1 while you trade on the rollup. that breaks the mercenary capital cycle that killed L2 TVL across the board
9) SWIFT pilot. BNP Paribas, BNY Mellon, reportedly JPM and HSBC in the test. on-chain settlement triggered by SWIFT messages, running on linea. ZK gives banks the privacy they need (they cannot torch their order book on a transparent ledger). ~15 min finality. EVM compatibility. consensys reputation built over 10 years working with mastercard, visa, JPM, sovereign banks. the leaks have stayed consistent for 8 months and the silence from SWIFT denying any of it is its own tell
10) technical side. type-1 zkEVM shipped Q1 2026. full ethereum equivalence, zero code changes for deployers. L1 soft finality, up to 5000 TPS. May 6: the rollup stack handed to the Linux Foundation. open source. institutions don't deploy serious capital on a chain owned by one company. that closed a door
11) aave fully restored WETH borrowing on linea may 18 with pre-crisis LTVs. the kelp DAO exploit in april was a layerzero bridge bug, not a linea problem. the network kept running through it. kelp now switching to chainlink CCIP. linea's infrastructure took an external hit and held
12) numbers. 1.31M ETH bridged. 591k+ unique addresses. 283M+ cumulative transactions. 7M+ wallets. 400+ partnerships live. aave, pancakeswap, sushi, lido all running on linea
DeFiLlama shows ~$38M TVL and people point to that as the death signal. what they miss: SBET's $170M sits in institutional custody through Anchorage Digital. regulated, compliant, not visible to on-chain scrapers. that's how institutional capital works. it doesn't show up on dashboards built for retail DeFi. DeFiLlama dashboards were built for retail DeFi. institutional custody doesn't render there. that's the whole story
$50M market cap. FDV $217M. this is priced like a failed memecoin. SBET picked it. metamask funnels 30M users into it. consensys is taking it public on wall street with goldman underwriting. SWIFT may be testing global interbank settlement on it
i keep buying. not telling anyone else to. but "everyone hates this" is usually where the trades sit
Hace 4 años alguien metió 4.700$ en un pool de liquidez de Uniswap V3.
Nada de trading diario.
Nada de estar mirando velas.
Nada de entrar y salir cada semana.
Simplemente eligió un par y lo dejó estar: ETH/DAI.
Configuró un rango de precio para ETH entre 1.400$ y 3.200$, dejó la posición funcionando en Optimism… y prácticamente se olvidó de ella.
Lo interesante es que no fue ni siquiera una estrategia perfecta. De hecho, el precio estuvo fuera de rango aproximadamente un 30% del tiempo.
Es decir, durante una parte importante del periodo, esa liquidez ni siquiera estaba generando comisiones.
Y aun así, después de 4 años, la posición había generado más de 5.000$ solo en comisiones.
La inversión inicial eran unos 4.700$.
Las comisiones superaron al capital inicial.
Esto es lo que mucha gente no entiende de DeFi.
No todo va de comprar una moneda esperando que haga x100.
No todo va de meterse en un protocolo rarao con un 8.000% APR que dura tres días.
No todo va de perseguir el último token de moda.
A veces la oportunidad te llegan con algo más aburrido:
Aportar liquidez.
Cobrar comisiones.
Dejar que el volumen haga su trabajo.
Y sí, hay riesgos:
Existe Impermanent Loss.
El precio puede salirse del rango.
Puedes elegir mal el par.
Puedes concentrar demasiado la liquidez.
Puedes meterte en pools sin volumen real.
Pero precisamente por eso este caso me parece tan interesante.
Porque no hablamos de una simulación.
No hablamos de una teoría bonita.
No hablamos de 1ingresos pasivos" inventados para vender humo.
Hablamos de una posición real en Uniswap V3 que estuvo funcionando durante años, y encima sin hacer interés compuesto.
Si esas comisiones se hubieran ido reinvirtiendo, el resultado habría sido todavía más potente.
Para mí, esta es una de las formas más infravaloradas de generar ingresos en cripto:
- No intentar adivinar siempre la próxima subida.
- No vivir pegado al gráfico.
- No depender de acertar el máximo y el mínimo. Sino usar protocolos reales, con volumen real, para que tu capital trabaje.
DeFi bien usado no es magia, es entender dónde se generan las comisiones, quién las paga y cómo puedes capturar una parte de esos intercambios.
En el próximo post te dejo el vídeo donde explico el caso completo y cómo se puede hacer paso a paso en Uniswap.
APRENDER CLAUDE AHORA ES COMO COMPRAR BITCOIN EN 2017.
LA MAYORÍA LO ENTENDERÁ DEMASIADO TARDE.
CREAR UN NEGOCIO DE UNA SOLA PERSONA Y FACTURAR $10K AL MES ESTÁ MÁS CERCA DE LO QUE IMAGINAS.
Aquí tienes 7 prompts para adelantarte al 99% de las personas en 2026:
Few testnets you need to be clicking on 🩷🩷
Fell in love with crypto by just clicking stuff on testnets > zero cost, real potential
Here full guide one by one (part-1) :-
2) @arc [ Stablecoin native L1 ]
▪︎ $ARC token confirmed
▪︎ $2.2B raised by Circle (@circle)
▪︎ Potential airdrop
—▪︎▪︎ Daily Arc Testnet Activities ▪︎▪︎—
■ Claim test USDC/EURC:
• https://t.co/PMlZY21Cej
• https://t.co/pX1Z6EbqxG
■ Daily Send GM
1) https://t.co/gD1hR0T0u1
2) https://t.co/bZbX2zViXw
■ Contract Deploy
1) https://t.co/DLI5Qgpuow
2) https://t.co/hHEAbFpS47
■ Collect a domain name on ARC
1) https://t.co/lOCywkYGWV
■ NFT Mint
1) https://t.co/FPsnIp6zRU…
2) https://t.co/N4GK50KCOL
■ Core Dashboard
1) https://t.co/nwgNn4IenD
2) https://t.co/7Bgnrou18z
> Track your activity on explorer ;
https://t.co/S9stHHbcsr
—▪︎▪︎ Arc builders House ▪︎▪︎—
■ Apply here : https://t.co/nIWzh4psAq
This is where real rewards live
(badges, roles, team access, future perks)
■ Daily 80–85+ pts routine:
• Login daily (+5)
• Read all 5 articles (+25)
• Watch featured video (+5)
• Post 1 quality update in Discussions (+10)
• Comment genuinely: 2 posts + 4 replies
• Aim for “Accepted Answer” bonus (+30)
• Complete full profile (+100 pts)
BULLISH ON ARC 🩷🩷
Two days ago, Kelp DAO suffered a $292 million exploit, the largest DeFi hack of 2026. The attack is elegant in its simplicity, terrifying in its implications, and a case study in how a single misconfiguration can cascade through the entire DeFi stack.
▶ The Setup
Kelp is a liquid restaking protocol. It creates rsETH -- a liquid token representing ETH restaked on EigenLayer. DeFi being DeFi, users want these tokens available across multiple chains. So Kelp uses LayerZero, a cross-chain messaging protocol, to bridge rsETH between networks.
The core idea behind any cross-chain bridge is straightforward:
- A user locks (or burns) tokens on Chain A
- An oracle observes and verifies that transaction
- The bridge mints an equivalent amount of tokens on Chain B
LayerZero's oracle mechanism is its Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN), a set of independent verifiers that must agree a cross-chain message is legitimate before it is executed.
The critical word here is "independent." And that's where things went wrong.
▶ The Vulnerability
For reasons that remain unclear, Kelp had configured a 1-of-1 DVN setup. One verifier. No redundancy. No independent confirmation. LayerZero had explicitly warned against this configuration. Kelp ignored the warning.
A single point of failure in a system securing hundreds of millions of dollars.
▶ The Attack
The attackers, preliminarily attributed to North Korea's Lazarus Group, didn't need to break any smart contract. They went after the infrastructure layer.
To verify blockchain state, a DVN relies on RPC nodes, the servers that synchronize and serve blockchain data. The attackers compromised two RPC nodes used by Kelp's lone DVN, then launched a DDoS attack against the remaining healthy nodes, forcing failover to the poisoned ones.
From there, it was trivial. The compromised RPC nodes presented a fabricated blockchain state to the DVN, pretending that 116,500 rsETH (~18% of total circulating supply) had been legitimately deposited on the source chain. The DVN, seeing no contradicting signal from any other verifier, approved the message. The attacker retrieved 116,500 rsETH freshly minted on the destination chain.
▶ The Liquidation
The attacker deposited the stolen rsETH as collateral on Aave V3 and Compound V3, then borrowed approximately $236 million in (W)ETH against it. By the time lending protocols reacted, freezing rsETH markets, halting new deposits, restricting withdrawals, the damage was done.
Aave now carries an estimated $177-196 million in bad debt. Its TVL plunged from ~$26.4 billion to ~$17.7 billion as panic withdrawals exceeded $5.4 billion. Whether Aave's safety module can fully absorb the loss remains an open question.
Not the decentralized and trustless ideal we went for... The Deeper Problem
Poisoning a handful of RPC nodes and DDoS'ing a few others was enough to fabricate $292 million out of thin air and erodes trust across the entire DeFi ecosystem. No smart contract exploit. No zero-day. Just a misconfigured verifier and an infrastructure-level attack on the nodes it relied on.
But the root cause runs deeper than Kelp's configuration. The fundamental problem is the trust model. Kelp's bridge, like most bridges and many Layer 2 rollups, relies on oracles reading blockchain state from RPC nodes and attesting that "this thing happened." The security of the entire system reduces to one question: can you trust the nodes feeding data to your verifier?
The Kelp hack proves the answer is no. Not the decentralized and trustless ideal we went for...
There is a fundamentally different approach: validity proofs. Instead of trusting oracles to honestly report what happened on another chain, you require a cryptographic proof, a zero-knowledge proof, that the state transition actually occurred according to the protocol's rules. The verifier on the destination chain doesn't trust any RPC node, any oracle, or any DVN. It checks the math. Either the proof is valid or it isn't.
This is exactly the model ZK rollups use to settle on Ethereum. The L1 doesn't ask an oracle "did these transactions happen?" It verifies a succinct proof that they did.
▶ The Goose That Lays the Golden Eggs
One could argue the attacker showed restraint. With a 1-of-1 DVN, they could have minted any amount, $292 BILLION, if they wanted. There are liquidity arguments (you can only extract what lending markets will let you borrow against) and detection arguments (the larger the mint, the faster the response). But there's a more cynical reading.
The Lazarus Group and similar state-sponsored actors are in a peculiar position. They could mint an amount large enough to collapse the entire DeFi ecosystem. But doing so would kill the very system they profit from. So they calibrate, enough to fund their operations, not so much that the ecosystem loses confidence and collapses. The goose must keep laying.
The DeFi ecosystem likes to talk about trustlessness and decentralization. But when a handful of poisoned RPC servers can drain nine figures and trigger a systemic crisis, we should be honest about where we actually are, and serious about the cryptographic tools that can actually get us there.
Stay safe.
Just unlocked my Gas ID via ETHGas 🪪
I'm a Teen Jack with 1.3564 ETH spent on gas since Beacon Chain - now fueling my climb to the Gasless Future and earned 1000 Beans already.
Reveal yours at https://t.co/xv3vffusJu
Introducing the Open Gas Initiative by ETHGas — a path to a frictionless onchain experience.
@Uniswap, @aave, @opensea… it's your time to step up and sponsor gas for users.⚡
Get started here: https://t.co/nP1kNaowBh
https://t.co/l2ZwoMjkeq
Introducing the Open Gas Initiative - a way for protocols to subsidize gas for users, zero-code, for a seamless, frictionless onchain experience.
With OG cohort: @eigencloud, @ether_fi, @pendle_fi, @Velvet_Capital.
👇
Just unlocked my Gas ID via ETHGas 🪪
I'm a Teen Jack with 1.3511 ETH spent on gas since Beacon Chain - now fueling my climb to the Gasless Future and earned 1000 Beans already.
Reveal yours at https://t.co/xv3vffv0z2
i signed up to omnia because i'm a gamer and definitely not just trying to farm early rewards
i seriously cannot wait to play this https://t.co/GCmL4TTrvr
there will be special content featured on the monad mainnet countdown stream - stay tuned for surprise guests
first one goes live now 👇
https://t.co/zRWpJABp30
Reply to this post with your EVM wallet address for some MON on Monad mainnet.
The MON will cover your first few gas fees so you can start using the chain right away.
You must be following @monad to receive it.