@gautambhatia88 6-3 is impossible in Russia as it prohibited dissenting opinions in 2020 and had eradicated judges capable of dissent way earlier (Russian lawyer here)
@the_answer_4_2 Там еще судебные решения опубликованы по административному производству, когда судьи три раза говорят «мы вообще-то не должны рассматривать жалобу отца по делу о решении совершеннолетней дееспособной дочери, но раз такая тема, то мы проверим законность, и да, закон соблюден»
@TiltingatM3 Sovetskoe konstitutsionnoe pravo, ed. by S.I. Rusinova and V.A. Ryanzhin. They argue that constitutional law cannot be limited to the study of the State bodies, but needs to account for the guiding role of the Communist Party (and that before 1977)
@APHClarkson@gleb_bogush@wardaddy_UA Turkish Government successfully undermines the credibility of European institutions, eg Council of Europe and European Court of Human Rights, disregarding the latter’s binding judgements. But yes, it transfers Azerbaijani gas, so is a “partner”, together with Aliyev
@juliettemm@CIJ_ICJ Do they know it’s trust or do they just infer from the figures? Because more cases may mean lots of things besides trust (and usually does).
@Ginitastar That’s indeed European Parliament, an organ of the European Union. You were at a different organisation, Council of Europe, you spoke at another building, Palais de l’Europe, in the hemicycle usually occupied by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (46, not 27)
The ECtHR has struck out new cases on politically motivated administrative detentions in Azerbaijan 📄
Unilateral declaration accepted:
💶 900 EUR for each applicant
⚖️ Acknowledgement of rights violations
But no real remedy ⬇️
@NoelleQuenivet1@ECPR The post gives too much credit to the arguments that keep the main reason of withdrawal under fog: namely, the withdrawing States want to kill asylum seekers because they have a different skin colour. The right question is whether CERD may invalidate the withdrawal? No, it seems