@lexfridman Happy to see you interview a broader depth of people as time goes on. Your empathy helps me understand multiple ways of looking at something. Letting someone steel man the opposing view is great. Keep it up Lex!
@bryan_caplan The increase in efficiency that late merging offers intrigues me a bit as I would think traffic is determined by the flow rate which is determined by the number of lanes. Late merging thus wouldnโt improve flow rate. Maybe itโs the result of less friction?
@BrendanEich@paulg Insightful, thanks for that. Wasnโt clear from the tweet but I include your work as โmoonshotโ. So although my definition might be wrong or we would disagree on it, please continue your great work sir!
@paulg Iโm interested in what causes the absence of engineering. Would engineers find more fulfilment in jobs or would they be better at recognising interests early on?
@paulg@BrendanEich Thousand ways to fail, limited ways to succeed. Naysayers by definition will be correct more often than not. Viewing them as smart is a heuristic we should try to avoid yet very strong imo. Luckily people continue to working on moonshots.
@elonmusk Being attacked for iterating and improving based on feedback and lessons learned is a sign of weakness in politics. A necessary trait for anyone else.
@Austen You have to admire the risk appetite and unwillingness to settle, he deserves more credit. Also isnโt the second graph strongly correlated to the first?