@telungunayaka Done 👍 I really wanted to know about origin/history of satavahana dynasty it is still in debated empire one more thing remember this name king satavahana 😁
@telungunayaka Puranas made everything clumsy because we got archeological evidence that doesn't suit most of the information in puranas so puranas became irrelevant only for satavahana dynasty
@telungunayaka They were servents to the andhras i mean they were andhrabhrityas and they defeated andhras and declared independence called themselves as satavahana
@telungunayaka We found coins of satavahana with a legend (rano) siri satavahana you are saying never mentioned as a king anywhere and he seems mythical wow nice 👍 bro
@telungunayaka I gave present evidence with simuka you asked it Simuka may be/may not be founder but satavahana was first ruler even in telugu textbook mentioned satavahana as(mula purusha) we don't know anything about satavahana other than his coins found almost all regions of their territory
@telungunayaka Oldest satavahana labelled limestone inscription of
"Rano vasishthiputra siri chimuka
Satavahana" with regnal year 16 with portrait image of chimuka also found in the kanaganahalli great stupa(KA).
@telungunayaka Pre-Satavahana Era: Because Megasthenes wrote around 310 BCE, his mention of the Andarae proves that a powerful Andhra polity existed and was well-organized before the rise of the famous Satavahana Dynasty, which later ruled the region.
@SanKarNaata@nameless_mp4_@nuditelugu Why our kannada people not talk much about satavahana and chutus i don't understand so many evidences are present do you know
@nameless_mp4_@SanKarNaata@nuditelugu Karnataka is always in picture but you people didn't see it and our badluck karnataka historians didn't see it or glorify it.
@nameless_mp4_@SanKarNaata@nuditelugu Satavahanas spread the script across the Deccan but andhras didn't use that script only used prakrit and Sanskrit .