@HiiiPowerRevo I worked with a guy kinda similar to Charles. Smart, brilliant and hard working but his personality was a big problem.
Whoever he talked to, would eventually end up being irritated by him. The way he talks, pushes his own ideas dismissing others is the problem
@IOHK_Charles@sou_danialves Cardano whale, Dave, Iagon people didnt call you FAT, THIEF or whatever else you mentioned.
They were questioning, and you somehow interpreted it as personal insult
@sou_danialves In real world, companies that are financed by government are public companies.
Public companies are inefficient, unorganized, unstable and suck balls.
Cannot survive on their own even if their life depended on it.
So no, you dont want projects on ADA supported by government
@A3Cpool_Shawn In real world, companies that are financed by government are public companies.
Public companies are inefficient, unorganized, unstable and suck balls.
Cannot survive on their own even if their life depended on it.
So no, you dont want projects on ADA supported by government
@cardanowhale001 Yes, because price of ADA is very important to general population, retail.
It sounds stupid and it shouldn´t be this way, but that´s the current state of crypto.
As much as we care about research, dapps and community, we should also pay attention so that ADA doesn´t fall down.
The biggest problem is the absence of real-business.
- Builders: Provide value worth paying for.
- Users: Pay for services they don't regret.
Obviously, this is the fundamental relations in business.
This is why all of surroundings are "Treasury first," and ADA keeps dropping.
@WelfBrandolf I fully agree. Price of ADA is not only important for onboarding new people, it is important for maintaining and building of wealth within projects so they can pay themselves.
At least thats my theory