Luke Hutchison

Computer scientist, computational biologist/chemist/physicist/cosmologist; PhD, MIT / Harvard Medical School; former Google AI research scientist; TED Fellow

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

I created a Claude Code skill that scours every major indexing service on the web to find the source or PDF for scientific papers, so that when you cite a paper, the claims you make around the citation are grounded in the actual content of the cited paper:
https://t.co/IcQpeuBijM

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@hexawyz @ONagel33303 These are arguments of thousands of hours of actual work -- arduous, complex, difficult work -- not arguments of authority.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@alwayspriyesh Pull some strings for me too while you're at it, pls 🙏

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@MichaelTontchev @Ldnbox Exactly

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@Ldnbox You are focused on position and not direction or velocity. Gemini will outstrip the others in capability and speed 6 months from now.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@HanyelPaulOkolo @ONagel33303 Have you asked all of Opus, Sol, and Argon to do a critical review of your research? Do that first, then maybe we can talk about it, depending on the findings!

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@Focus_NOPAT @ONagel33303 AI is definitely much better than I am at almost everything but being creative. But realize that the sum of a human plus an AI is greater than either individually.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@hazae41 @ONagel33303 Yes, correct

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@0x_p_k @ONagel33303 @uncertainsys Elliptic curve is a whole other animal

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@higbee @ONagel33303 Point Claude at this, and then ask it if your assumption is correct:

https://t.co/keaQTDaDLI

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@AdamSimecka @ONagel33303 Why thank you, sir

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@matt_is_nice @PJDEJOE @ONagel33303 No, unfortunately... I used to be a believer in this but I'm not anymore

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@Crazymoments01 Very cute but that's definitely AI

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@CryptoCraft256 @ONagel33303 You spend your time how you want, and I will spend my time how I want.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@privacymatter21 Thanks for actually fact-checking!

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

Well somehow I'm trending today in cryptocurrency Twitter. Hello, passionate people.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@bruddhhha Yes, I built ClassGraph, and ClassGraph is way, way more powerful than Reflections, especially in in the new ClassGraph v6 that I just released.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

After 10 billion tokens of deep, extensive codebase analysis and improvement, fixing 7 years' worth of TODOs, I released version 6 of the widely-used #Java metaprogramming library ClassGraph: optimized, re-architected, modernized, and made futureproof.

https://t.co/lYilTCQzMO

As part of this release, I split out ClassGraph's highly optimized and threadsafe/lock-free zipfile parser into a separate library, and made it into a full virtual filesystem, classgraph-vfs. This is the fastest, most scalable/paralleizable, and most full-featured/versatile VFS in the Java ecosystem.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

Bitcoin has previously been ruled, only in SEC opinions, not by law, to NOT be a security, like ETH was ruled to be. But the SEC makes law by fiat, by suing people and then leaning on case law, bypassing Congress in violation of the Constitution, and they win almost all their cases, creating case law that serves their purposes. So I'm sorry to break it to you, but the status of Bitcoin could change anytime. If it is ever ruled to be a security, then Bitcoin is dead, because every transaction will be taxed as a sale of property (SEC vs Shavers 2013), and running an unregistered exchange or not paying properly-calculated tax on every transaction could land you in jail during some future US government's tenure.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@AndersonAndrue It's what most people believe, based on how resistant the proof has been that P could equal NP, but it is by no means actually obvious from the problem description or known math that P≠NP.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@TerenceRWhalen @ONagel33303 SHA-1 and SHA-2 are not even in the same universe as SHA-256. SHA-256 is a truly well-defined one-way function.

[Luke Hutchison @LH]

@TerenceRWhalen @ONagel33303 Interesting theory