LIVE WITH ANDREW

Photographer, Law Researcher, Certified in HR Management

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

I question all these streamers tha been covering the Nancy Guthrie case . You had no idea this would of been like this. Do you question if there is any commutations with the U.S. Department of State's Overseas Citizens Services (OCS) or the Central Intelligence Agency? Could nancy been kidnapped sent over to mexico then transferred to another country?

Down below is something similar so I feel there are groups that have targets and actually transport out of state.
https://t.co/xhTz0fynDi

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

@CriminalNetworX @JLRINVESTIGATES @DadsGoneLive @tedinvestigate During the days that Nancy Guthrie is missing, I found myself wondering: could something like this happen again? Could someone disappear without leaving any trace or sign of life behind? Another question I have is whether, even if law enforcement conducted a thorough and transparent investigation, a future case could end up the same way. Despite all the resources, technology, and officers searching, is it possible that someone could still vanish without answers being found? With something like this

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

16 more followers and my goal is set. My next goal is crazy

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

@CriminalNetworX Alex put that tent there like what the fuck are you going to do about it
https://t.co/OxoSFgKuUU

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

ALEX YOUR AMAZING: did you just see that right after alex farted the tent expanded like he blow it up a little from that fart air
https://t.co/LOcG4azPVK

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

@CriminalNetworX I've been watching Alex for a while now on stream, and I feel he should host some comedy events.

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

ALEX YOUR AMAZING: did you just see that right after alex farted the tent expanded like he blow it up a little from that fart air
https://t.co/LOcG4azPVK

[momma bear @ElleMow27]

Criminal Network/Alex’s adventures searching for Nancy Guthrie continue in the @CFAtucson neighborhood.

Day 107 - Admits to taking a fat dump on Sue Ellen’s property

Day 125 - Throwing piss from a container onto the ground on live stream 🤢

@PimaSheriff and Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) @PimaCounty @pimacountyaz

Pima County Code 7.29.040

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

BREAKING: Chaotic scene in Newark as a series of vehicles are driven away from the Delaney Hall Detention Facility
https://t.co/2RrtCmiGO8

[Brendan Gutenschwager @BGOnTheScene]

BREAKING: Chaotic scene in Newark as a series of vehicles are driven away from the Delaney Hall Detention Facility

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

No, a police warning cannot generally be given by a tweet on X or a post on Twitter. Official law enforcement warnings require direct, verifiable service to the individual, such as in-person delivery, an official written notice, or a formal summons.While police departments frequently use social media to broadcast general public safety announcements, a public tweet does not constitute a legally binding warning or a formal legal order. A tweet cannot prove that the intended recipient actually received and understood the notice.

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

https://t.co/FsnZPyvbYj

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

Many people in both Arizona and Massachusetts have argued that certain high-profile cases have exposed broader concerns about public trust in law enforcement and the justice system.

In Massachusetts, the case involving Karen Read became one of the most closely watched trials in state history. A jury acquitted Read of murder and manslaughter charges in 2025, finding her guilty only of operating under the influence.

The controversy extended beyond the verdict itself. Public attention focused heavily on the conduct of some investigators, particularly former Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor. Text messages revealed during the case led to disciplinary actions and his eventual termination. Following the verdict, Massachusetts State Police leadership publicly acknowledged that the case had forced the agency to review its practices, training, oversight, and accountability measures.

At the same time, it is important to separate proven facts from allegations. Some people believe the investigation was deeply flawed or biased, while others continue to believe the prosecution acted appropriately based on the evidence available. Read has since filed civil litigation alleging misconduct and corruption by investigators, but those allegations remain matters for the courts to decide.

As for public trust, that's a broader issue. When a major case raises questions about investigative procedures, evidence handling, or officer conduct, confidence in law enforcement can be affected even among people who disagree about the defendant's guilt or innocence. The Massachusetts State Police have publicly stated that reforms and increased accountability efforts were undertaken in response to issues highlighted during the case.
https://t.co/02s37f0uEK

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

@EricLDaugh I think it's both democrat and republican leadership are the issues at the highest levels. Which I am saying both parties are agitators that show negative views.

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

It was done when DAA JUICE was the only streamer there? From what I have heard, the sheriff's department was down the street and knew DAA JUICE was there an hour before? What was that sheriff doing while parked down the street? Why was the sheriff shaken up and felt uncomfortable while speaking with DAA JUICE? It's all simple questions for me to better understand.

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

https://t.co/ZAo108TC4w

[LIVE WITH ANDREW @LIVEWITHANDREW]

@JLRINVESTIGATES @DAA_JUICE1 @PimaSheriff I sure hope it was not because he is black we are in 2026 and should be over all that . But the way some people "maybe" thinking for the possible target for this event. We should go back to the 1964 Civil Rights Act