i still think we're in an automation-augmentation race: whether the future features fulfilling human work isn't something we discover, but depends on technical and policy work today.
if you're looking to join the race on the side of augmentation, this is a great place to start.
Most ages of invention are also driven by (and end with the decline of) a specific social institution staffed by a specific Type of Guy that is structured to solve certain kinds of problem and depends on hyperstition. E.g. the Baconian program and the early modern scientific community of letters, the early-1800s amateur inventors, the late 1800s Edison/Tesla -style lab, the military-industrial state-sponsored WW2 research effort, Bell Labs, the ad-funded big-tech company, the SaaS startup, and the frontier lab. They are not interchangeable in what they pursue or who runs them or what mission they serve. It's not a Civilization game, there is no impartial "more progress" lever that is cranked repeatedly to roll along a pre-built track. The hyperstitioning means it's often hard to cancel one once it's launched though, of course
@GuiveAssadi Consider also: LLMs product space is vastly unexplored (and exploration is mostly contingent on what people decide to explore) and choices like emphasizing chat early on or defining progress as autonomy (vs e.g. productivity uplift) will have long-lasting effects
@captgouda24 i always write until i reach a fixed point of the lossless semantic summarization operation
but then people ask me why my ai scenario series is 20k words or whatever
i explain it says many things
“but surely you could’ve said it shorter”
no. read it again.
@luke_drago_ & I will be running a stream at @MATSprogram this fall on issues like the intelligence curse, gradual disempowerment.
In the 1800s, people figured out how to orient society so that industrialization was good for people. We need this for AI
FAQs:
Q: what sort of people should apply?
A: people with deep unease about existing ideas & paradigms here, who have experience in one or more of econ, history, policy/gov, AI futurism/forecasting, or political philosophy
Sharing our work on full-duplex multimodal models -- real-time interaction that's natural and intuitive without compromising on intelligence.
We started Thinky in part to differentially advance capabilities for human-AI collaboration, which are underemphasized relative to intelligence/autonomy because they're harder to eval.
In the future, we think every AI system will have something like an interaction model as the outer user-facing layer, continually keeping the user informed and learning what they actually want.
the only choice a soul can make in the face of any technology that does not structurally appeal to our better natures but instead treats us as temporary scaffolding, conduits, and passthrus to be replaced
is to disengage and build another option for self and kind
Working with Tinfoil was great. Trusted execution environments remain a very underrated technology for upholding privacy & freedom (for a hopefully-useful example of making them work at scale, see https://t.co/uA5FTZxEgG )
Congrats @WorkshopLabs on joining @thinkymachines! We worked together on private post-training and their vision has strongly influenced our own at @TinfoilAI.
At a time when so many feel disenfranchised by AI, @LRudL_ and @luke_drago_'s Intelligence Curse essays are some of the clearest writing on what's at stake, and their vision of AI that superpowers human agency is needed more than ever. Thinky is very lucky to have them.