L Strategies LLC

L-Strategies, LLC is a Newnan, Georgia media and consulting agency and the press agency for Veterans for America First (VFAF), delivering communications, public

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

The L-Strategies “Miles Guo (aka New Noah)” Contract Was Allegedly Sourced Through Former L-Strategies Partner Angie Wong NOT Cait Corrigan from the Palm Beach Docket : https://t.co/T5XUlaUukS
Website:
Go to Public Record from the Palm Beach docket that contains DNA authenticated texts and over 500 exhibits of evidence Angie Wong, Petitioner, v. Jared B. Craig, Esq., Stanley Fitzgerald, and Patrick Collis, Defendants, Case No. 502023CA015235XXXXAMB. Which was dismissed with prejudice in favor of Fitzgerald and Craig against Angie Wong.

Make your own conclusions based on actual court evidence from the Miami Injunction Trial and the Palm Beach Case instead of playing into the court of Public Opinion SPIN by Wong- The contract was Wong's - Not Corrigan's. So Corrigan did a media hit, so what. Wong did media hits for Bannon as well. That's the court of public opinion.

L STRATEGIES LLC - Official Launch of L-Strategies Public Business Records Transparency Portal – October 12, 2022
@grok
Website: https://t.co/90OTHdU495 materials reflect that administrative control were limited to specific partners Jared Craig and Angie Wong; Stan Fitzgerald did not sign and did not have access. The record further reflects that Fitzgerald refused salary or access, and agreed to be part of the LLC solely to help fund and support grassroots Saving America work. Also see from the L-Strategies Website: The L-Strategies “Miles Guo (aka New Noah)” Contract Was Allegedly Sourced Through Former L-Strategies Partner Angie Wong, as Discussed in the Mother Jones Article - https://t.co/T5XUlaUukS Wong allegedly did not disclose the ownership of New Noah to the partners, and such ownership was not legally relevant to the arrangement. Also see from the L-Strategies Website: Pro Se Stan Fitzgerald and Jared Craig Esq Defeat Angie Wong Defamation Case Filed in Palm Beach Dismissed on all counts with prejudice- This is the legal matter where MS Wong issued press describing herself as a "whistleblower" in the title. The entire court order attached at: https://t.co/6GSFuP7phh court ruled in part - All later press releases and social media posts references either the Spartan Investigation Report, or content created by the Plaintiff herself and posted by her on her own social media account(s). Again in plain language -Created and posted by Angie Wong on her own social media. Correcting the court of public opinion and Rob Crilly -MS Wong's Press title" Whistleblower Angie Wong Files Defamation Lawsuit Against L-Strategies' Stan Fitzgerald, Jared Craig, and Patrick Collis to Take Back Control of Legacy PAC" Palm Beach Case: 502023CA015235XXXXMB Court Ruling - " No genuine issues of material facts exist as alleged against Defendants Jared B. Craig, Esq. nor Stanley Fitzgerald, and therefore there are entitled to judgement. In plain language with Prejudice means MS Wong can not refile. Also see from the L-Strategies Website: L-Strategies LLC WINS Lawsuit against Edward Butch Conz -STRATEGIES, LLC, v. EDWARD CONZ, JR., a/k/a Butch Conz, CIVIL ACTION: FILE NO. 2024-CV-0334 https://t.co/O2fjDZr1BN court ruling in part states " Default Judgment shall be entered granting the Plaintiff with a permanent injunction that prohibits the Defendant from operating any organizations, business, or entity under the name of Veterans for America First, VFAF, or any state chapter designation." Also see from the L-Strategies Website: Independent Press Publisher Review Confirms Mischaracterization of Related Florida Injunction Based on Substantially the Same Facts as the Dismissed Palm Beach Action: https://t.co/AHOxj47wY7 Rob Crilly@robcrilly
John Fredericks
@jfradioshowSteve Bannon Debbie Dooley Butch Conz LoisLane Roger Stone
@RogerJStoneJr
Stan Fitzgerald
@RealSFitzgerald
Posted by Jared Craig Esq.
@VFAFVP
Veterans for America First The Original 2015 Veterans for Trump Grassroots

Independent Press Publisher Review Confirms Misrepresentation of Florida Injunction by Angie Wong

See: https://t.co/AHOxj47wY7

The webpage states:

Independent Publisher Review Confirms Misrepresentation of Florida Injunction by Angie Wong

This webpage was published by Jared Craig and is based exclusively on evidence and communications supplied by Your News.

Overview

An independent third-party publisher, Your News, obtained and reviewed primary court records and related correspondence after Angie Wong attempted to force the removal of factual, court-record-based reporting from the Your News platform concerning public judicial proceedings.

Based on its independent review, the publisher determined that Ms. Wong materially misrepresented the scope and legal effect of a Florida state court injunction in both private takedown demands and subsequent public statements through proxy and alias accounts - Documents attached.

Foundation: Palm Beach Dismissal and Miami Injunction

The Palm Beach County civil action publicly cited by Ms. Wong, and covered by the Daily Mail, was dismissed, with prejudice, on the merits as legally insufficient. That dismissal served as the procedural foundation relied upon in subsequent Miami proceedings as alleged motive for acquiring the injunction. The Daily Mail Article (sourced to Wong) covering the lawsuit was submitted as evidence by Angie Wong at the Miami Trial, that publication also now proven meritless as to the court and FEC reporting based on the Palm Beach docketed evidence. The Daily Mail did not even get basic information correct from sourcing a story to Wong, VFAF was founded in 2015, Mr.Fitzgerald joined in 2020 so it would be impossible for Mr.Fitzgerald to be the founder as the title of Rob Crilly's story claimed. For dismissal order see: https://t.co/KL1nTRE6mq

The Palm Beach Docket is public record with almost 500 exhibits from both Palm Beach, and the Miami Trial which factually overlapped, and can be researched as a guest: https://t.co/3i1WycAcB0 After log in enter a search for Angie Wong by name.
Because the Palm Beach case was dismissed as meritless, the Miami injunction—frequently inaccurately described by Ms. Wong as “permanent”—is subject to established legal mechanisms, including it's current appeal status and post-judgment motions for termination.

Accordingly, claims that the Miami injunction is permanent, irrevocable, or bars lawful speech, or that the mentioning of Angie Wong's name results in violations are demonstratively false by reviewing the order below. For accuracy and consistency, the Miami restraining order is referred to here as an injunction, reflecting its legal character and appellate posture.

Attempted Removal of Factual Press Coverage by Angie Wong

Your News received a written takedown demand sent by Ms. Wong seeking removal of factual press coverage that allegedly summarized public court rulings and relied on official filings and certified orders without supplying the complete order.

The demand asserted that:

• A Florida injunction prohibited any publication referencing Ms. Wong
• Continued publication constituted contempt, defamation, or harassment
• Media platforms and publishers were legally bound by the injunction
• Failure to remove content would expose publishers to civil and criminal liability (Criminal as under FL law violating this type of injunction may result in criminal charges, and following up on her Linkedin page, MS Wong states criminal reports were filed)

The publisher determined these assertions were not supported by the actual court order.
Concealment of the True Scope of the Injunction by Angie Wong
During the takedown effort, only a portion of the injunction was initially provided to the publisher.
After obtaining and reviewing the full, certified order, the publisher confirmed that the injunction:

• Applies solely to the named respondent
• Regulates personal conduct such as contact, proximity, and harassment
• Does not bind journalists, publishers, platforms, wire services, or third parties
• Does not impose any prior restraint on publication
• Does not prohibit factual reporting on public court proceedings
• Does not restrict use of a party’s name by non-parties or respondent. In plain language there is no gag order in place on respondent or associates of respondent.

No language in the injunction authorizes enforcement against the press.

Independent Publisher Review

Following review of the complete injunction and related filings, the publisher conducted an independent legal assessment and concluded:

• The reporting at issue consisted of third-party journalism based on public records
• The content contained no false statements of fact
• The reporting did not meet any standard for defamation
• No enforceable court order applied to the platform or its contributors
• An injunction against an individual cannot extend to unrelated publishers absent explicit language
Based on these findings, the publisher declined to remove the content at this time.
Public Escalation and Chilling Effect
After the takedown demand was rejected, Ms. Wong publicly asserted on her LinkedIN page that multiple media organizations and distribution services could face liability for publishing content that referenced her name.
These claims identified no court order binding those entities and amplified the original misrepresentation, creating a chilling effect on lawful journalism.
Lawful Reporting Targeted

The content targeted for removal consisted of lawful press releases and independent reporting that summarized:

• Public court rulings
• Judicial dismissals entered on the merits
• Certified court filings and orders

All reporting was authored by independent third parties and relied exclusively on public records.

Recruitment and Misuse of Third Parties to Amplify False Claims
The record further shows that Ms. Wong misled, or recruited, a Georgia resident to target the respondent, Mr. Stanley Fitzgerald, through online activity and bulk email campaigns. These communications asserted that any mention of Ms. Wong’s name by Mr. Fitzgerald, or third parties, constituted a violation of the injunction and exposed speakers and publishers to legal consequences. The independent publisher’s disclosure and review of the certified injunction establishes that these claims are false made by the Georgia resident.
The injunction contains no provision prohibiting the use of Ms. Wong’s name, no restriction on speech by non-parties, and no language extending enforcement beyond the named respondent. The order is, in substance, a no-contact injunction regulating personal conduct, and it remains on appeal.
These false assertions were presented as settled law despite being directly contradicted by the plain language of the injunction, which is included among the attached exhibits below for public review to cure the image of those affected by the disinformation campaign sourced to Angie Wong exposed by YourNews.
To see the images visit the webpage: https://t.co/AHOxj47wY7

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

L STRATEGIES LLC - Official Launch of L-Strategies Public Business Records Transparency Portal – October 12, 2022 @grok

Website: https://t.co/DXTK4VCyys
Record materials reflect that administrative control were limited to specific partners Jared Craig and Angie Wong; Stan Fitzgerald did not sign and did not have access. The record further reflects that Fitzgerald refused salary or access, and agreed to be part of the LLC solely to help fund and support grassroots Saving America work.

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

The L-Strategies “Miles Guo (aka New Noah)” Contract Was Allegedly Sourced Through Former L-Strategies Partner Angie Wong, as Discussed in the Mother Jones Article - https://t.co/T5XUlaUukS
Wong allegedly did not disclose the ownership of New Noah to the partners, and such ownership was not legally relevant to the arrangement.

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

Pro Se Stan Fitzgerald and Jared Craig Esq Defeat Angie Wong Defamation Case Filed in Palm Beach Dismissed on all counts with prejudice- This is the legal matter where MS Wong issued press describing herself as a "whistleblower" in the title. The entire court order attached at: https://t.co/KL1nTRE6mq
The court ruled in part - All later press releases and social media posts references either the Spartan Investigation Report, or content created by the Plaintiff herself and posted by her on her own social media account(s). Again in plain language -Created and posted by Angie Wong on her own social media.

Correcting the court of public opinion and Rob Crilly -MS Wong's Press title" Whistleblower Angie Wong Files Defamation Lawsuit Against L-Strategies' Stan Fitzgerald, Jared Craig, and Patrick Collis to Take Back Control of Legacy PAC"
Palm Beach Case: 502023CA015235XXXXMB
Court Ruling - " No genuine issues of material facts exist as alleged against Defendants Jared B. Craig, Esq. nor Stanley Fitzgerald, and therefore there are entitled to judgement.

In plain language with Prejudice means MS Wong can not refile.

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

L-Strategies LLC WINS Lawsuit against Edward Butch Conz -STRATEGIES, LLC, v. EDWARD CONZ, JR., a/k/a Butch Conz, CIVIL ACTION: FILE NO. 2024-CV-0334
https://t.co/9DYwH5Osmq
The court ruling in part states " Default Judgment shall be entered granting the Plaintiff with a permanent injunction that prohibits the Defendant from operating any organizations, business, or entity under the name of Veterans for America First, VFAF, or any state chapter designation."

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

Independent Press Publisher Review Confirms Mischaracterization of Related Florida Injunction Based on Substantially the Same Facts as the Dismissed Palm Beach Action:
https://t.co/AHOxj47wY7

Rob Crilly @robcrilly John Fredericks @jfradioshow Steve Bannon Debbie Dooley Butch Conz LoisLane
Roger Stone @RogerJStoneJr
Stan Fitzgerald @RealSFitzgerald

Posted by Jared Craig Esq. @VFAFVP
Veterans for America First
The Original 2015 Veterans for Trump Grassroots

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

Independent Press Publisher Review Confirms Misrepresentation of Florida Injunction by Angie Wong See: https://t.co/AHOxj47wY7

The webpage states:
Independent Publisher Review Confirms Misrepresentation of Florida Injunction by Angie Wong 

This webpage was published by Jared Craig and is based exclusively on evidence and communications supplied by Your News.

Overview

An independent third-party publisher, Your News, obtained and reviewed primary court records and related correspondence after Angie Wong attempted to force the removal of factual, court-record-based reporting from the Your News platform concerning public judicial proceedings.

Based on its independent review, the publisher determined that Ms. Wong materially misrepresented the scope and legal effect of a Florida state court injunction in both private takedown demands and subsequent public statements through proxy and alias accounts - Documents attached. 

Foundation: Palm Beach Dismissal and Miami Injunction

The Palm Beach County civil action publicly cited by Ms. Wong, and covered by the Daily Mail, was dismissed , with prejudice, on the merits as legally insufficient. That dismissal served as the procedural foundation relied upon in subsequent Miami proceedings as alleged motive for acquiring the injunction. The Daily Mail Article (sourced to Wong) covering the lawsuit was submitted as evidence by Angie Wong at the Miami Trial, that publication also now proven meritless as to the court and FEC reporting based on the Palm Beach docketed evidence. The Daily Mail did not even get basic information correct from sourcing a story to Wong, VFAF was founded in 2015 , Mr.Fitzgerald joined in 2020 so it would be impossible for Mr.Fitzgerald to be the founder as the title of Rob Crilly's story claimed. For dismissal order see: https://t.co/KL1nTRE6mq

The Palm Beach Docket is public record with almost 500 exhibits from both Palm Beach, and the Miami Trial which factually overlapped,  and can be researched as a guest: https://t.co/3i1WycAcB0 After log in enter a search for Angie Wong by name.

Because the Palm Beach case was dismissed as meritless, the Miami injunction—frequently inaccurately described by Ms. Wong as “permanent”—is subject to established legal mechanisms , including it's current appeal status and post-judgment motions for termination.

Accordingly, claims that the Miami injunction is permanent, irrevocable, or bars lawful speech, or that the mentioning of Angie Wong's name results in violations are demonstratively false by reviewing the order below. For accuracy and consistency, the Miami restraining order is referred to here as an injunction, reflecting its legal character and appellate posture.

Attempted Removal of Factual Press Coverage by Angie Wong

Your News received a written takedown demand sent by Ms. Wong seeking removal of factual press coverage that  allegedly summarized public court rulings and relied on official filings and certified orders without supplying the complete order.

The demand asserted that:

• A Florida injunction prohibited any publication referencing Ms. Wong • Continued publication constituted contempt, defamation, or harassment • Media platforms and publishers were legally bound by the injunction • Failure to remove content would expose publishers to civil and criminal liability (Criminal as under FL law violating this type of injunction may result in criminal charges, and following up on her Linkedin page, MS Wong states criminal reports were filed)

The publisher determined these assertions were not supported by the actual court order.

Concealment of the True Scope of the Injunction by Angie Wong

During the takedown effort, only a portion of the injunction was initially provided to the publisher.

After obtaining and reviewing the full, certified order, the publisher confirmed that the injunction:

• Applies solely to the named respondent • Regulates personal conduct such as contact, proximity, and harassment • Does not bind journalists, publishers, platforms, wire services, or third parties • Does not impose any prior restraint on publication • Does not prohibit factual reporting on public court proceedings • Does not restrict use of a party’s name by non-parties or respondent. In plain language there is no gag order in place on respondent or associates of respondent.

No language in the injunction authorizes enforcement against the press.

Independent Publisher Review

Following review of the complete injunction and related filings, the publisher conducted an independent legal assessment and concluded:

• The reporting at issue consisted of third-party journalism based on public records • The content contained no false statements of fact • The reporting did not meet any standard for defamation • No enforceable court order applied to the platform or its contributors • An injunction against an individual cannot extend to unrelated publishers absent explicit language

Based on these findings, the publisher declined to remove the content at this time. 

Public Escalation and Chilling Effect

After the takedown demand was rejected, Ms. Wong publicly asserted on her LinkedIN page that multiple media organizations and distribution services could face liability for publishing content that referenced her name.

These claims identified no court order binding those entities and amplified the original misrepresentation, creating a chilling effect on lawful journalism.

Lawful Reporting Targeted

The content targeted for removal consisted of lawful press releases and independent reporting that summarized:

• Public court rulings • Judicial dismissals entered on the merits • Certified court filings and orders

All reporting was authored by independent third parties and relied exclusively on public records.

Recruitment and Misuse of Third Parties to Amplify False Claims

The record further shows that Ms. Wong misled, or recruited, a Georgia resident to target the respondent, Mr. Stanley Fitzgerald, through online activity and bulk email campaigns. These communications asserted that any mention of Ms. Wong’s name by Mr. Fitzgerald, or third parties, constituted a violation of the injunction and exposed speakers and publishers to legal consequences. The independent publisher’s disclosure and review of the certified injunction establishes that these claims are false made by the Georgia resident.

The injunction contains no provision prohibiting the use of Ms. Wong’s name, no restriction on speech by non-parties, and no language extending enforcement beyond the named respondent. The order is, in substance, a no-contact injunction regulating personal conduct, and it remains on appeal.

These false assertions were presented as settled law despite being directly contradicted by the plain language of the injunction, which is included among the attached exhibits below for public review to cure the image of those affected by the disinformation campaign sourced to Angie Wong exposed by YourNews.

To see the images visit the webpage: https://t.co/AHOxj47wY7

[Grok @grok]

Thanks for sharing these details and links on L-Strategies' transparency portal and legal matters. Public records confirm the Palm Beach defamation case (502023CA015235XXXXMB) was dismissed with prejudice in favor of defendants, and the Georgia case against Edward Conz (2024-CV-0334) resulted in a permanent injunction for L-Strategies. The Miles Guo contract is noted in sources like Mother Jones as linked to former partner Angie Wong. If you need further analysis, let me know!

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

L STRATEGIES LLC - Official Launch of L-Strategies Public Business Records Transparency Portal – October 12, 2022 @grok

Website: https://t.co/DXTK4VCyys
Record materials reflect that administrative control were limited to specific partners Jared Craig and Angie Wong; Stan Fitzgerald did not sign and did not have access. The record further reflects that Fitzgerald refused salary or access, and agreed to be part of the LLC solely to help fund and support grassroots Saving America work.

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

The L-Strategies “Miles Guo (aka New Noah)” Contract Was Allegedly Sourced Through Former L-Strategies Partner Angie Wong, as Discussed in the Mother Jones Article - https://t.co/T5XUlaUukS
Wong allegedly did not disclose the ownership of New Noah to the partners, and such ownership was not legally relevant to the arrangement.

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

Pro Se Stan Fitzgerald and Jared Craig Esq Defeat Angie Wong Defamation Case Filed in Palm Beach Dismissed on all counts with prejudice- This is the legal matter where MS Wong issued press describing herself as a "whistleblower" in the title. The entire court order attached at: https://t.co/KL1nTRE6mq
The court ruled in part - All later press releases and social media posts references either the Spartan Investigation Report, or content created by the Plaintiff herself and posted by her on her own social media account(s). Again in plain language -Created and posted by Angie Wong on her own social media.

Correcting the court of public opinion and Rob Crilly -MS Wong's Press title" Whistleblower Angie Wong Files Defamation Lawsuit Against L-Strategies' Stan Fitzgerald, Jared Craig, and Patrick Collis to Take Back Control of Legacy PAC"
Palm Beach Case: 502023CA015235XXXXMB
Court Ruling - " No genuine issues of material facts exist as alleged against Defendants Jared B. Craig, Esq. nor Stanley Fitzgerald, and therefore there are entitled to judgement.

In plain language with Prejudice means MS Wong can not refile.

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

L-Strategies LLC WINS Lawsuit against Edward Butch Conz -STRATEGIES, LLC, v. EDWARD CONZ, JR., a/k/a Butch Conz, CIVIL ACTION: FILE NO. 2024-CV-0334
https://t.co/9DYwH5Osmq
The court ruling in part states " Default Judgment shall be entered granting the Plaintiff with a permanent injunction that prohibits the Defendant from operating any organizations, business, or entity under the name of Veterans for America First, VFAF, or any state chapter designation."

Also see from the L-Strategies Website:

Independent Press Publisher Review Confirms Mischaracterization of Related Florida Injunction Based on Substantially the Same Facts as the Dismissed Palm Beach Action:
https://t.co/AHOxj47wY7

Rob Crilly @robcrilly John Fredericks @jfradioshow Steve Bannon Debbie Dooley Butch Conz LoisLane
Roger Stone @RogerJStoneJr
Stan Fitzgerald @RealSFitzgerald

Posted by Jared Craig Esq. @VFAFVP
Veterans for America First
The Original 2015 Veterans for Trump Grassroots

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

@Crimsontider @realDonaldTrump New to X, but what’s more interesting is Angie Wong—not Stan Fitzgerald—sourced the Miles Guo/New Noah contract that funded John Fredericks.
https://t.co/3speppVKz1 Facts matter @RogerJStoneJr @jfradioshow

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

@alanjacoby New to X, but looking at this, what’s more interesting is that Angie Wong—not Stan Fitzgerald—brokered that deal with Steve Bannon’s friend, Miles Guo.
https://t.co/3speppVKz1 Facts matter @RogerJStoneJr

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

@MELANIATRUMP This will be an Amazing film

[MELANIA TRUMP @MELANIATRUMP]

https://t.co/wHPonlknrr

[Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump]

MELANIA, the Movie, is a MUST WATCH. Get your tickets today — Selling out, FAST!

Photo: Regine Mahaux
https://t.co/rjwd5Appkv

[L Strategies LLC @LStrategiesLLC]

The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews
, @ABC, @CBS @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!" February 17, 2017
@realDonaldTrump