I spoke with @LaulPatricia about Marxism:
One is: Whatās remarkable is that Marxism has been tried. Now, of course, defenders of Marxism say it hasnāt really been tried anywhere, but certainly the people who implemented it claimed they were implementing Marxism.
And this is a massive experimentāa global experimentāwith a very clear outcome. Namely, the Soviet Union was a disaster. The imposition of communism on Eastern Europe was a disaster. The imposition of communism in Venezuela was a disaster. The imposition of communism in Maoist China was a disaster. Disaster in terms of both poverty and oppression and genocide and stupid wars. So the world has told us what happens under communism, and itās a sign of how out of touch intellectuals can be that there are still people who defend it despite the entire world giving a very clear-cut answer.
One more is: would you rather live in North Korea or South Korea? Would you rather live in the old East Germany or West Germany? We have an experimental group and a matched control group in terms of culture, language, and geography, and the answer is crystal clear. So this is a sign of, I think, the pathology of intellectual lifeāthat Marxism can persist.
The other is, you did call attention to one of the appeals of Marxism, though, and more generally of heavy, strong influence of government guided by intellectuals, which is that there are certain kinds of reforms that you can state as principles. You can articulate them verbally as propositionsālike equality, human rights, democracyābut thereās other kinds of progress that take place in massive distributed networks of millions of people, none of whom implements some policy. But collectively, there is an order, an organization thatās beneficial.
So that can happen organically through, for example, the development of a language. No one designed the English language. Itās just hundreds of millions of English speakers. They coin new words. They forget old words. They try to make themselves clear. And we get the English language and the other 5,000 languages spoken on earth.
Likewise, a market economy is something where knowledge is distributed. You donāt have a central planner deciding how many shoes of size 8 will be needed in a particular city, but rather information is conveyed by prices, which are adjusted according to supply and demand. And youāve got a distributed network of exchange of information that can result in an emergent benefit.
Now, intellectuals tend to hate that. They like rules of languageāof correct grammar. They like top-down economic planning. They like cultural change that satisfies particular ideals described by intellectuals. And so rival sources of organization, like commerce, like cultureātraditional cultureātend to be downplayed by intellectuals.
And this can be magnified by the fact that many dictatorships give a privileged role to intellectuals, which may be why, over the course of the 20th century, and probably continuing to the present, there has not been a dictator that has not had fans among intellectualsāincluding the mullahs and ayatollahs of Iran, but also the communist dictators: Mao and Castro, even Stalin in his day. And every other dictator has had, actually, often fawning praise from Western intellectuals.
We have officially been on our unfair labor practice strike for one month. And in that month, 1000s of baristas in nearly 150 cities have joined together with allies, community leaders, and elected officials - all to tell Starbucks with one unified voice āNO CONTRACT, NO COFFEE.ā
Today, striking baristas are taking the picket line to Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol's office.
Instead of investing in workers, Starbucks is on a spending spree - notably, on Niccolās sky-high compensation, his satellite office away from HQ, & a private jet for commute. $SBUX
Hundreds of Starbucks baristas and labor organizers blockaded Starbucks' largest distribution center in York, Pennsylvania, halting distribution of syrups, coffee beans, and other supplies to the entire northeast.
This escalation is part of @SBWorkersUnited ongoing strike.
NEW: 45+ major organizations sent a letter to Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol urging the company to finalize fair union contracts.
"We will continue to back union workersā fight, including by not crossing barista picket lines at Starbucks if they feel striking is necessary." š„š„
Hannah Einbeinder on saying āFree Palestineā during her #Emmys acceptance speech:
āIt is my obligation as a Jewish person to distinguish Jews from the state of Israel because our religion and our culture is such an important and long-standing institution that is really separate to this sort of ethnonationalist state.ā
Seriously, what are we talking about? The right will do whatever they think they have the power to accomplish, they donāt need, or care, about whether they have the narrative or pretext.
Genuine question. Why is the assumption that the right-wing needs a pretext to unleash political repression and violence? Why didnāt they need a pretext for any of the recent violent repression theyāve been deploying?