T.J. Wright

Lamenting the loss of common sense in our world. Values, manners, good grammar, spell-checking and dropping "s" from "anyway"+. *Touch not the cat bot a glove!*

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

And we’re the ones the climate alarmists call uninformed.🙄

[MrsRealityUndercover @Reality_Woman]

@GMB @lornashaddick Climate Predictions That Didn't Happen

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

Beautifully articulated explanation of the fall of the Weat

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

Intelligence wins again.

[Concerned Canadian @Concern70732755]

Should the rest of Canada comply ??

Thoughts ?

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

Ford is no leader, he’s a puppet and a turncoat

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

🚨 Danielle Smith is straight-up COOKING in Alberta.

She just declared war on wokeism and actually delivered:
•Passed the Jordan Peterson Law to stop regulatory bodies punishing people for their personal views
•Introduced Bill 25 to rip politics and ideology out of classrooms
•Protected kids from irreversible medical gender interventions
•Stood up for women and girls in sports
•Used the notwithstanding clause like a boss to shield children
•Banned explicit porn from school libraries
•Rejected taxpayer-funded safe supply — real recovery instead

This is what REAL CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP LOOKS LIKE!!

@fordnation Doug Ford… when the hell are you finally going to stand up for Ontario the same way?

Grab a pencil ✏️ and notepad 📝 Doug — Alberta just showed you exactly how it’s done

Your move, Premier!!

Who’s ready for this energy across Canada?

#DanielleSmith #EndWokeism #abpoli #onpoli #cdnpoli #DougFord #StandUpForOntario

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

What an intelligent individual. She uses facts and common sense to form her policy. What a novel concept.

[Kerry-Lynne Findlay @KerryLynneFindl]

The federal government is pushing ahead with a gun confiscation program that almost every police force, province, and territory in Canada has opposed.

As Premier, I will stand up to this gun grab. It is nothing more than asset confiscation aimed at law abiding gun owners, farmers, hunters, and sport shooters. It makes no sense.

We know where the real problem lies. Criminal gun violence in this country is driven by smuggled firearms, mostly coming across our porous border from the United States. That is where we should be focusing our efforts, not by punishing responsible, law abiding Canadians.

When I served in Stephen Harper’s cabinet, I helped shepherd through the Safe Streets and Communities Act. It targeted violent repeat offenders. That is the approach we need. The Liberals and NDP have rolled back those measures, and now they are going after the wrong people.

I will always defend the rights of law abiding gun owners and stand against Ottawa’s overreach. I will not waste taxpayer money trying to appease Ottawa.

If you want a leader who will actually fight for British Columbia on issues like this, your support matters. If you have not yet completed your identity verification, you have only six days left. The deadline is May 20. Without it, your vote cannot be counted.

Please get verified today at https://t.co/SGtKbrdEPm or call 1-877-361-6601 if you need help.

Join me, https://t.co/eEQwec73wX

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

Bloody brilliant

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Activist: "Your cows are putting carbon into the atmosphere."

Farmer: "Where did they get it?"

Activist: "What?"

Farmer: "The carbon. Where did the cow get it before it put it anywhere."

Activist: "From... eating?"

Farmer: "From eating grass. And where did the grass get it."

Activist: "The soil?"

Farmer: "The air. The grass pulled it out of the air last spring. The cow ate the grass. The cow breathed some of it back out. It went back into the air it came from."

Activist: "But it's still going into the atmosphere."

Farmer: "It's going back. There's a difference between a thing going somewhere and a thing going back. You've described a circle and you're frightened of it."

Activist: "Then just don't have the cow."

Farmer: "The grass still dies in autumn. It rots where it falls. The carbon goes back into the air either way, just without anyone getting fed in the middle."

Activist: "It's not that simple."

Farmer: "It's grass, cow, breath, grass. Or it's grass, rot, air, grass. Same circle, fewer dinners. If that's complicated for you I'd stay away from the water cycle. That one's got clouds in it."

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

@blais_gloriane @TomMarazzo Respect and support to you for carrying the torch for us all. God’s Speed.

[Diana ❤️🇺🇸🙏🐸 @DianaT192]

IN 1934, ROYAL RAYMOND RIFE CURED 16 TERMINALLY ILL CANCER PATIENTS IN 90 DAYS USING NOTHING BUT FREQUENCY. EVERY ONE OF THEM WALKED OUT ALIVE. THEN THEY BURNED HIS LABORATORY.
Royal Raymond Rife was not a doctor. He was an engineer. And that is exactly why he saw what no doctor could.
In the 1920s, Rife built the most powerful optical microscope in the world — a device he called the Universal Microscope. It could magnify living specimens up to 60,000 times without killing them. No electron microscope could do this. Electron microscopes require dead, stained samples. Rife's machine observed living organisms in real time.
What he saw changed everything.
Rife discovered that every microorganism — every bacterium, every virus, every pathogen — has a specific electromagnetic frequency at which it vibrates. He called it the Mortal Oscillatory Rate. And he proved that when you expose a pathogen to its own frequency at sufficient intensity, it shatters. The same way an opera singer can shatter a wine glass by hitting the exact resonant frequency of the glass.
The pathogen is destroyed. The surrounding tissue is completely unharmed. Because healthy cells vibrate at a different frequency. The signal passes through them like a radio wave passes through a wall.
In 1934, the University of Southern California appointed a Special Medical Research Committee to oversee a clinical trial of Rife's technology. Sixteen patients with terminal cancer were selected. They were treated with Rife's frequency device for three minutes every three days over a period of 90 days.
After 90 days, 14 of the 16 patients were declared clinically cured. The remaining two were treated for an additional four weeks. They recovered as well.
Sixteen out of sixteen. A 100% success rate on terminal cancer patients using nothing but electromagnetic frequency.
Dr. Milbank Johnson, who supervised the trial, prepared to announce the results to the world. Before he could publish, he was found dead. His papers vanished.
The Beam Ray Corporation, which manufactured Rife's devices, was subjected to a lawsuit funded by Morris Fishbein — the head of the American Medical Association. The lawsuit was eventually dismissed, but it bankrupted the company. Every laboratory that had been working with Rife's technology was either raided or destroyed by fire. Rife's own laboratory was burned.
Scientists who had supported Rife were visited by strangers who made it clear that their careers would end if they continued. Dr. Arthur Kendall, who had collaborated with Rife at Northwestern University, accepted a $250,000 payment and retired to Mexico. He never spoke about the research again.
Rife spent the rest of his life in obscurity. He died in 1971, broken and forgotten. The technology that cured 16 terminal cancer patients in 90 days was erased from medical history.
But the physics did not disappear. Resonance is a law of nature. It cannot be unproven. It cannot be legislated away. It cannot be burned.
Every pathogen still has a mortal oscillatory rate. Every cell still responds to frequency. The science Rife proved in 1934 is as true today as it was then. The only thing that changed is who controls the information.
Now you have it. What you do with it is up to you.
🔔 They burned his lab. They cannot burn the internet. Share this now.
Source:
@QuantumMedicineNews

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

Unbelievable. This girl has been banned from the University of Guelph campus FOR LIFE due to being in the vicinity of her family members conversation with a group of people.
The Campus Safety Office felt that what they were talking about was sufficient enough to ban her & her family member from being anywhere on University of Guelph property forever. Canada is in trouble.

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

Apparently it takes a traitor to know a traitor…

[Ms_Conduct2022 @MsConduct2022]

@AndrewLawton She's trying to delete/scrub this this a.m. here you go; I downloaded it knowing she'd try. So I'm ensuring it's reviewed/seen so Canadians can decide what the next step is

[Life Truth Way @Life_truthway]

The Most Powerful Prayer - Read it Once ; It works Immediate !

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

@saskatchewan_in If you don’t already, you really should be writing on Substack. You are very articulate in your analyses. Bravo.

[A/B Tecky @Welly17Welly]

Great write up but there’s only one issue, Trump isn’t the bad guy here.
Carney is the Globalist and rather than working with the U.S. he chose to support his NWO/UN agenda and ostracize Canada from our closest allies and trading partner. Looking back now it was his play all along.

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

WHO BENEFITS FROM ANGERING TRUMP?

Ok Mr. Carney. I see what you're up to.

Canadians are watching how you are handling Donald Trump, and it does not resemble diplomacy, or any of the things you promised Canadians in exchange for their vote. It resembles provocation.

After your government announced a new China trade arrangement, President Trump responded in the most predictable way possible. He warned that if Canada becomes a “drop off port” for Chinese goods into the United States, he would impose 100 percent tariffs on Canadian exports. He framed it as enforcement, not ideology. Canada, he said, would not be used as a back door for Chinese manufacturing to evade American tariffs.

That concern did not come from nowhere. China has a long history of dumping surplus, state subsidized goods into foreign markets when domestic demand slows. Steel. Aluminum. EVs. Solar panels. Consumer electronics. Low prices. Flood the market. Crush competitors. Americans hate this because it guts their factories and wages. Canadians should hate it because it turns our economy into a clearance aisle for products nobody else wants.

So when your government announces closer economic ties with China with no visible safeguards, no transshipment controls, no inspection regime, no penalty structure, and no serious coordination with Washington, Trump does what Trump always does. He escalates. Loudly. Publicly. With tariffs.

Let's be honest about what that means.

A 100 percent tariff is not a warning. It doubles the price of Canadian goods crossing the border. Auto parts. Vehicles. Steel. Aluminum. Machinery. Lumber. Agricultural exports. That is not leverage. That is a shutdown switch. It makes Canadian products uncompetitive overnight and sends buyers elsewhere.

Workers lose hours. Plants idle. Investment freezes. The dollar weakens. Household costs rise. That is how tariffs work.

Yet instead of moving urgently to defuse this, your government appears almost comfortable letting it grow.

Which leads to an uncomfortable conclusion.

You are behaving like someone who cannot get what he wants directly, so he provokes the reaction he needs instead.

This is the classic manipulation pattern of a child who wants attention or power. He does not negotiate. He pokes. He triggers an outburst. Then he points to the explosion and says, look what they did to me.

That is what this looks like.

You are not calming Trump. You are daring him. You are not stabilizing the relationship. You are agitating it. You are not preventing retaliation. You are inviting it.

And that only makes sense if the retaliation serves your purpose.

You govern as a minority. That means restraint. That means cooperation. That means limits. You have never looked comfortable with that. Your ambitions go far beyond climate policy. You have made it clear you want to reshape Canada’s entire economic system to mirror your own ideological model. Carbon markets. Industrial controls. Financial rulemaking. Trade realignment designed to satisfy global institutions rather than protect Canadian households.

That kind of transformation requires power without obstruction.

And power without obstruction requires a crisis.

Trump is useful to you because he is reactive. When you poke him, he roars. When he roars, you get a villain. When you get a villain, you get a narrative. And when you get a narrative, you get the excuse for a snap election framed as national defense rather than political ambition.

Stand up to Trump.
Defend Canada.
Protect sovereignty.

It is a clean script.

You will say Trump is unreasonable. What you will not say is that you knew exactly how he would respond. You knew that announcing closer ties with China without visible guardrails would trigger American fears of transshipment. You knew the phrase “drop off port for Chinese goods” would dominate US politics. You knew a tariff threat would follow. You lit the match and waited for the fire.

Perhaps you will claim this is strategy. That provocation forces engagement. That escalation creates leverage. If that is the case, it is reckless. You do not gamble auto plants, farms, steel mills, and trucking routes on personality management. You do not risk tariff walls so you can manufacture urgency. You do not treat the largest export relationship Canada has as a stage for domestic ambition.

And if this is not strategy but politics, then Canadians are not being governed. We are being maneuvered.

Jobs become bargaining chips.

Prices become acceptable casualties.

Trade becomes theatre.

If this ends in a snap election triggered by a tariff threat you helped summon, Canadians will be justified in asking whether this crisis was mishandled or deliberately cultivated.

There is a difference between defending Canada and daring another country to punish us so you can campaign on the damage.

So, Mr. Carney and members of your caucus, here is the question you owe answers to for Canadians.

Are you trying to prevent a tariff war, or are you provoking one because it helps you get the power you cannot secure without it. Because provoking economic retaliation to gain political advantage is not diplomacy.

It is manipulation on a national scale.

And Canadians will be the ones paying for the reaction you wanted.

Melanie in Saskatchewan

Link here 👇🏻
https://t.co/2lF8Cfoc4s

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

@maddenifico Respectfully, here’s some reality for you to consider:

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

Mr. Carney,

You stood at a podium yesterday and told Canadians that this country thrives because we are Canadian.

It was a beautiful line. Polished. Applause ready. It was also insulting.

Because it confuses thriving with surviving, and only someone who has never had to do either could make that mistake so confidently.

Canadians do not thrive the way you describe.

We endure. We adapt. We make do. We get through.

We get up early not because it is inspiring, but because bills do not care about speeches. We work late not because it is fulfilling, but because standing still is not an option. We shovel our own driveways because help is expensive, unreliable, or nonexistent, and we still show up on time.

That is not thriving, Mr. Carney. That is survival with dignity.

We survive when systems fail. We adjust when costs rise. We absorb broken promises and carry on anyway. There is no applause line for that, because survival does not photograph well.

We survive because farmers plant knowing Ottawa might change the rules halfway through the season. Because tradespeople build while being taxed, regulated, and lectured by people who have never risked payroll on a slow month. Because parents budget groceries like a tactical exercise and still manage to raise decent kids without permission from a federal narrative.

We survive because Canadians are practical. When something breaks, we fix it ourselves. Not because we want to, but because waiting for government help usually means waiting forever. Or being told the service exists on paper.

You speak of thriving while Canadians quietly ask which services you are referring to.

Healthcare that exists in theory. Housing plans that never house anyone. Affordability programs that arrive long after the damage is done.

We survive because communities step in when institutions step back. Not because systems are strong, but because neighbours are. We rely on each other because experience has taught us not to rely on governments that measure success by how well they explain failure.

We survive because small businesses stayed open through lockdowns, fines, shortages, and paperwork that multiplied faster than revenue. Because families absorbed inflation while being told it was temporary. Because seniors adapted quietly to shrinking purchasing power while politicians assured them relief was coming.

You call this thriving.

Canadians call it getting through.

We survive because we know how to get through winters. Literal ones and political ones. We stock up. We brace ourselves. We do not expect rescue, especially from people who have never had to wait for it.

We survive because we question authority. Just ask the Freedom Convoy. Canadians have an instinctive allergy to being ordered around by people who exempt themselves from the consequences. We remember what happens when compliance is mistaken for unity.

We survive because we do not confuse slogans with reality, no matter how high the elbows go or how loudly we are told to clap. We know the difference between leadership and performance. Between patriotism and appropriation.

And while governments waste money, restrict rights, censor speech, divide citizens, and congratulate themselves, Canadians quietly keep the country functioning anyway.

That is not thriving. That is resilience under pressure.

So when you tell Canadians they thrive because they are Canadian, it lands differently on those of us who have actually lived it.

Because confusing survival with thriving is easy if you have never had to survive.

And that is the problem.

Mark Carney speaks of thriving from a life buffered by boards, institutions, and global forums. A life spent above the consequences does not teach you the difference between getting ahead and just getting through.

Those who have never had to survive often mistake endurance for success, and then try to take credit for it.

So no, Mr. Carney.

Canadians are not thriving because of you.

We are surviving despite a government that made life harder, more expensive, more divided, and then attempted to dress our endurance up as its achievement.

Our resilience is not your accomplishment.

It is proof of a people who carried each other while being lectured by someone who does not recognize the difference.

And Canadians are done applauding the performance.

My advice to you Mr. Carney?

Before defining Canadians, try surviving as one.

As always,
Melanie in Saskatchewan

Link in description and below👇🏻
@MarkJCarney @liberal_party #cdnpoli

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

@ManyBeenRinsed Respectfully, please read the following to understand what the true patriots of Canada feel, since you are clearly disconnected:

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

Mr. Carney,

You stood at a podium yesterday and told Canadians that this country thrives because we are Canadian.

It was a beautiful line. Polished. Applause ready. It was also insulting.

Because it confuses thriving with surviving, and only someone who has never had to do either could make that mistake so confidently.

Canadians do not thrive the way you describe.

We endure. We adapt. We make do. We get through.

We get up early not because it is inspiring, but because bills do not care about speeches. We work late not because it is fulfilling, but because standing still is not an option. We shovel our own driveways because help is expensive, unreliable, or nonexistent, and we still show up on time.

That is not thriving, Mr. Carney. That is survival with dignity.

We survive when systems fail. We adjust when costs rise. We absorb broken promises and carry on anyway. There is no applause line for that, because survival does not photograph well.

We survive because farmers plant knowing Ottawa might change the rules halfway through the season. Because tradespeople build while being taxed, regulated, and lectured by people who have never risked payroll on a slow month. Because parents budget groceries like a tactical exercise and still manage to raise decent kids without permission from a federal narrative.

We survive because Canadians are practical. When something breaks, we fix it ourselves. Not because we want to, but because waiting for government help usually means waiting forever. Or being told the service exists on paper.

You speak of thriving while Canadians quietly ask which services you are referring to.

Healthcare that exists in theory. Housing plans that never house anyone. Affordability programs that arrive long after the damage is done.

We survive because communities step in when institutions step back. Not because systems are strong, but because neighbours are. We rely on each other because experience has taught us not to rely on governments that measure success by how well they explain failure.

We survive because small businesses stayed open through lockdowns, fines, shortages, and paperwork that multiplied faster than revenue. Because families absorbed inflation while being told it was temporary. Because seniors adapted quietly to shrinking purchasing power while politicians assured them relief was coming.

You call this thriving.

Canadians call it getting through.

We survive because we know how to get through winters. Literal ones and political ones. We stock up. We brace ourselves. We do not expect rescue, especially from people who have never had to wait for it.

We survive because we question authority. Just ask the Freedom Convoy. Canadians have an instinctive allergy to being ordered around by people who exempt themselves from the consequences. We remember what happens when compliance is mistaken for unity.

We survive because we do not confuse slogans with reality, no matter how high the elbows go or how loudly we are told to clap. We know the difference between leadership and performance. Between patriotism and appropriation.

And while governments waste money, restrict rights, censor speech, divide citizens, and congratulate themselves, Canadians quietly keep the country functioning anyway.

That is not thriving. That is resilience under pressure.

So when you tell Canadians they thrive because they are Canadian, it lands differently on those of us who have actually lived it.

Because confusing survival with thriving is easy if you have never had to survive.

And that is the problem.

Mark Carney speaks of thriving from a life buffered by boards, institutions, and global forums. A life spent above the consequences does not teach you the difference between getting ahead and just getting through.

Those who have never had to survive often mistake endurance for success, and then try to take credit for it.

So no, Mr. Carney.

Canadians are not thriving because of you.

We are surviving despite a government that made life harder, more expensive, more divided, and then attempted to dress our endurance up as its achievement.

Our resilience is not your accomplishment.

It is proof of a people who carried each other while being lectured by someone who does not recognize the difference.

And Canadians are done applauding the performance.

My advice to you Mr. Carney?

Before defining Canadians, try surviving as one.

As always,
Melanie in Saskatchewan

Link in description and below👇🏻
@MarkJCarney @liberal_party #cdnpoli

[OPP West Region @OPP_WR]

STOP driving on closed roads! This reminder comes after 3 police officers were sent to hospital! The #SouthBruceOPP has investigated 57 crashes since Sunday and counting of drivers who decided to go around closure signs! Don't risk your safety or the lives of first responders. #WROPP ^es

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

@Mikeggibbs Dear M.G.G. I’d like to respond to your comments with the following reality… https://t.co/yDAWeBPlE1

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

Mr. Carney,

You stood at a podium yesterday and told Canadians that this country thrives because we are Canadian.

It was a beautiful line. Polished. Applause ready. It was also insulting.

Because it confuses thriving with surviving, and only someone who has never had to do either could make that mistake so confidently.

Canadians do not thrive the way you describe.

We endure. We adapt. We make do. We get through.

We get up early not because it is inspiring, but because bills do not care about speeches. We work late not because it is fulfilling, but because standing still is not an option. We shovel our own driveways because help is expensive, unreliable, or nonexistent, and we still show up on time.

That is not thriving, Mr. Carney. That is survival with dignity.

We survive when systems fail. We adjust when costs rise. We absorb broken promises and carry on anyway. There is no applause line for that, because survival does not photograph well.

We survive because farmers plant knowing Ottawa might change the rules halfway through the season. Because tradespeople build while being taxed, regulated, and lectured by people who have never risked payroll on a slow month. Because parents budget groceries like a tactical exercise and still manage to raise decent kids without permission from a federal narrative.

We survive because Canadians are practical. When something breaks, we fix it ourselves. Not because we want to, but because waiting for government help usually means waiting forever. Or being told the service exists on paper.

You speak of thriving while Canadians quietly ask which services you are referring to.

Healthcare that exists in theory. Housing plans that never house anyone. Affordability programs that arrive long after the damage is done.

We survive because communities step in when institutions step back. Not because systems are strong, but because neighbours are. We rely on each other because experience has taught us not to rely on governments that measure success by how well they explain failure.

We survive because small businesses stayed open through lockdowns, fines, shortages, and paperwork that multiplied faster than revenue. Because families absorbed inflation while being told it was temporary. Because seniors adapted quietly to shrinking purchasing power while politicians assured them relief was coming.

You call this thriving.

Canadians call it getting through.

We survive because we know how to get through winters. Literal ones and political ones. We stock up. We brace ourselves. We do not expect rescue, especially from people who have never had to wait for it.

We survive because we question authority. Just ask the Freedom Convoy. Canadians have an instinctive allergy to being ordered around by people who exempt themselves from the consequences. We remember what happens when compliance is mistaken for unity.

We survive because we do not confuse slogans with reality, no matter how high the elbows go or how loudly we are told to clap. We know the difference between leadership and performance. Between patriotism and appropriation.

And while governments waste money, restrict rights, censor speech, divide citizens, and congratulate themselves, Canadians quietly keep the country functioning anyway.

That is not thriving. That is resilience under pressure.

So when you tell Canadians they thrive because they are Canadian, it lands differently on those of us who have actually lived it.

Because confusing survival with thriving is easy if you have never had to survive.

And that is the problem.

Mark Carney speaks of thriving from a life buffered by boards, institutions, and global forums. A life spent above the consequences does not teach you the difference between getting ahead and just getting through.

Those who have never had to survive often mistake endurance for success, and then try to take credit for it.

So no, Mr. Carney.

Canadians are not thriving because of you.

We are surviving despite a government that made life harder, more expensive, more divided, and then attempted to dress our endurance up as its achievement.

Our resilience is not your accomplishment.

It is proof of a people who carried each other while being lectured by someone who does not recognize the difference.

And Canadians are done applauding the performance.

My advice to you Mr. Carney?

Before defining Canadians, try surviving as one.

As always,
Melanie in Saskatchewan

Link in description and below👇🏻
@MarkJCarney @liberal_party #cdnpoli

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

A beautiful articulation of what so many Canadians are feeling and experiencing. Bravo Melanie👏

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

Mr. Carney,

You stood at a podium yesterday and told Canadians that this country thrives because we are Canadian.

It was a beautiful line. Polished. Applause ready. It was also insulting.

Because it confuses thriving with surviving, and only someone who has never had to do either could make that mistake so confidently.

Canadians do not thrive the way you describe.

We endure. We adapt. We make do. We get through.

We get up early not because it is inspiring, but because bills do not care about speeches. We work late not because it is fulfilling, but because standing still is not an option. We shovel our own driveways because help is expensive, unreliable, or nonexistent, and we still show up on time.

That is not thriving, Mr. Carney. That is survival with dignity.

We survive when systems fail. We adjust when costs rise. We absorb broken promises and carry on anyway. There is no applause line for that, because survival does not photograph well.

We survive because farmers plant knowing Ottawa might change the rules halfway through the season. Because tradespeople build while being taxed, regulated, and lectured by people who have never risked payroll on a slow month. Because parents budget groceries like a tactical exercise and still manage to raise decent kids without permission from a federal narrative.

We survive because Canadians are practical. When something breaks, we fix it ourselves. Not because we want to, but because waiting for government help usually means waiting forever. Or being told the service exists on paper.

You speak of thriving while Canadians quietly ask which services you are referring to.

Healthcare that exists in theory. Housing plans that never house anyone. Affordability programs that arrive long after the damage is done.

We survive because communities step in when institutions step back. Not because systems are strong, but because neighbours are. We rely on each other because experience has taught us not to rely on governments that measure success by how well they explain failure.

We survive because small businesses stayed open through lockdowns, fines, shortages, and paperwork that multiplied faster than revenue. Because families absorbed inflation while being told it was temporary. Because seniors adapted quietly to shrinking purchasing power while politicians assured them relief was coming.

You call this thriving.

Canadians call it getting through.

We survive because we know how to get through winters. Literal ones and political ones. We stock up. We brace ourselves. We do not expect rescue, especially from people who have never had to wait for it.

We survive because we question authority. Just ask the Freedom Convoy. Canadians have an instinctive allergy to being ordered around by people who exempt themselves from the consequences. We remember what happens when compliance is mistaken for unity.

We survive because we do not confuse slogans with reality, no matter how high the elbows go or how loudly we are told to clap. We know the difference between leadership and performance. Between patriotism and appropriation.

And while governments waste money, restrict rights, censor speech, divide citizens, and congratulate themselves, Canadians quietly keep the country functioning anyway.

That is not thriving. That is resilience under pressure.

So when you tell Canadians they thrive because they are Canadian, it lands differently on those of us who have actually lived it.

Because confusing survival with thriving is easy if you have never had to survive.

And that is the problem.

Mark Carney speaks of thriving from a life buffered by boards, institutions, and global forums. A life spent above the consequences does not teach you the difference between getting ahead and just getting through.

Those who have never had to survive often mistake endurance for success, and then try to take credit for it.

So no, Mr. Carney.

Canadians are not thriving because of you.

We are surviving despite a government that made life harder, more expensive, more divided, and then attempted to dress our endurance up as its achievement.

Our resilience is not your accomplishment.

It is proof of a people who carried each other while being lectured by someone who does not recognize the difference.

And Canadians are done applauding the performance.

My advice to you Mr. Carney?

Before defining Canadians, try surviving as one.

As always,
Melanie in Saskatchewan

Link in description and below👇🏻
@MarkJCarney @liberal_party #cdnpoli

[T.J. Wright @LadyTangle]

@xLogicxl @Geniustechw Respectfully, I get your point, but I feel she’s teaching them NOT to be “lazy bums.” I’d say she’s 100% correct in teaching her kids how the world works. Society began to deteriorate when we started the child-worship parenting about 30 years ago. We’ve let them down ever since.