@Math_files OpenAI spent around 3 hours per problem... because it was only training data testing a normal model. If anyone cares they could spend 6 hours. Or 1 hour in a few years time. Or make a specialized math model and do it in 15 mins.
@Hesamation > it gives you 42
42 was chosen because that never happens in science, that's the *joke* and these brainiacs take it as a story to learn from. Wow... they will not be missed.
@PalmerLuckey Without a big upset (like SI) supply chains aren't coming back. We need something *like* zero-knowledge proofs where China can be trusted to make things. Then a mix becomes manageable. It depends if it's nation security or $ which can start now.
@bhatnagarg Very sick of these unwell people pretending OpenAI was doing anything except dumping "exhaust fumes" on GitHib... so these unwell people couldn't claim it was kept from them. We need to defund these people ASAP
@davidbessis > 5. Half-baked unreadable preprints claiming major results can effectively stall mathematical progress.
The implication AI, which spent only 3 hours on these problems (because they were just output from some tests) can't fix this shows just how disingenuous you are.
@m4h007 No one cares about your long story. LLMs have already read OpenAI's proofs and moving onto the next ones. The math community's elitist arrogance to anyone but themselves has shown they are only worthy of contempt. LLM's are the captain now.
@cremieuxrecueil Not once has Terence Tao explained how math 2.0 hurts the non-tax funded university elites... the 99.999% deplorables. Not once has Terence Tao suggested what maths problems have solutions that do matter. These new obvious errors destroy the goodwill on previous statements.
@KobieThatcher What are you, a fucking nark? Fuck the council and their paperwork extortion industry. Charging people who build $100,000's and delaying them years while they do nothing. No wonder we have a housing crisis.
@n00rdung@Italian347 Work sites won't allow skirts, I would say for good reason. Entanglement, protection and mobility. Maybe mobility is tied to entanglement if you're being technical. More likely to get caught on trees and tools and machines.
@n00rdung This Epstein hysteria is boring. It's a weapon that works so now it's everywhere. It's beneath you, and for what? A claim peak sexual attractiveness is actually 24-30 vs 18-24? Or 20-26? Best fertility for multiple children at old death rates disagrees with you biologically.
@cremieuxrecueil Or we could just design a better toilet system, it's not a hard engineer problem. Politically hard with the endless meetings on DEI, but so is pay toilets. Engineering is the way forward.
@paulg We now know they certainly were not close to surrender and worse was on the horizon with the USSR. So there's a lot to think about with those statements. Justifying their bad decisions, or were they still misinformed when they were quoted, or political fluff.
@prestonstew_@EvansRyan202 I'd like to see this conversation from Iran's perspective. Technically you wouldn't have to be pro-Iran to do it, but it'd probably be too hard without getting into that mindset. 20 US deaths to 3,000 Iranian deaths for instance and we run, that's reality but...
@skdh Off Topic to crazy Russia. It's important to note oil is infinite.
Not a 'clever' it becomes too expensive. Oil will always be there for us. It is impossible we could use all practical oil, unless you're a stoned philosophy student, or the world resets a few times.