@PhDVoice@PostdocVoice As a junior PhD scientist I'd say it's better to be second. Shows more contribution to the actual work. Further down your career path I'd think last author is more beneficial
@PhDVoice@PostdocVoice I'm very comfortable with my current supervisor. I like it since I don't feel nervous about discussing my work and I can approach him easily.
@Esrraaas@PhDVoice@ThePhDPlace Just start writing. Don't think you have to write in order. Put down what you can and what comes easiest. Then build from there.
@AcademicChatter It's fine. There's a bad mentality of 'Work all day every day, do nothing else. If you do anything else and don't dedicate your life to this then you're not serious' in academia. Do what you need to do for yourself.
@IjeomaOparaPHD On this, imagine my horror when I found all the work and results I was writing up for my MSc thesis published online with one of my collaborators as a co-author
@HereToVentPhD@PhDVoice Yes, you grow a thick skin and learn to always expect it. Remember they're critiquing the work, it's not anything personal. Learn and keep going. It's part of the process.
@FromPhDtoLife I've started a few veggie patches using seeds from food items I've eaten. It's really soothing to spend some time in the garden each day
@AidenEQuinn@PhDVoice I have supervisors with similar ideas. I was co-author on 3 publications this year and first author on 1. I mostly managed this because sample collection was on going and other work was related.
It takes a lot of time and is not sustainable for every year of the PhD.