@ABC writing fake fear-based articles for clicks, implying Tesla safety features are dangerous, dissuades people from using safety features which are PROVEN TO SAVE LIVES.
ABC and other “news” organizations reporting this garbage are actually costing real peoples’ lives. Think about that.
ABC, you should be ashamed of yourselves. Intentionally discouraging people from using life-saving technology for clicks is absolute scum.
Adding “allegedly” to save face and make the article wording legal makes me sick. Anyone who uses FSD (or Autopilot/TACC) knows this “allegedly” claim will be debunked, not to mention that in the 1/10000000000 chance that one of these technologies was engaged during the crash, supervision is required and it is the driver at fault anyway.
Also, why does the article title say “self driving” while the image graphic says “autopilot”? Is the “journalist” who wrote this so bad at their job (or unethical) that they don’t know the difference? For an article like this, I’d say that’s probably the most important detail to be aware of.
A driver in a Tesla vehicle that was allegedly in self-driving mode crashed into a Texas house Friday night, killing a woman who was inside the home, investigators said. https://t.co/jnu5dRECiI
@NemGee@Haloblk_global@JCChristopher@ChuckCook@wholemars@AIDRIVR@JoeTegtmeyer That's amazing. Glad you are seeing the results too. Many people commented on my YouTube video (with clear results tracked) that it was a paid review, the results were faked, etc.
You've replicated them and even noticed better results than I. Love to see it. Thanks for the tag.
SpaceX should put some Starlinks around the moon, drop a Cybertruck on the surface with a retractable solar panel for charging, let the truck FSD literally anywhere it wants, and livestream it back to earth.
$SPCX $TSLA