The DOJ has ONE WEEK left to charge Anthony Fauci for the worst cover-up in modern medical history.
He lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Millions died. Trillions were spent. And Fauci walked away with book deals and fawning media coverage instead of handcuffs. I re-upped my criminal referral to the DOJ because the evidence is overwhelming, and justice has been delayed long enough.
RT if you’re ready to see Fauci behind bars.
In 2017, one my first tasks at the White House was to keep Bobby Kennedy far away from the West Wing.
Not because President Trump didn't want him there (he'd actually agreed to Bobby's pitch to create a vaccine safety commission).
But others (you can guess who) weren't thrilled, and they told me to get rid of him.
So I protected the orthodoxy I'd been trained to protect.
And it took me years to realize what I had actually done.
Tomorrow, I publish the full confession.
The 2002 autism moms I ignored. The 2017 vaccine safety commission I killed. The 2021 moment I finally broke. The apology I owed Secretary Kennedy. And what I've done to atone.
It's hardest thing I've written.
I'm sending it out to my list at 6am. (link to sign up in comments)
I’m hearing that some members are upset about the blowback they’re receiving from their constituents for voting against the amendment to remove pesticide liability protections. I have absolutely nothing to do with that. I don’t control activists, influencers, outside groups, or anyone else, and it’s a pretty big cop-out to suggest otherwise. Newsflash: people are genuinely upset that this provision was added to the Farm Bill and that it would have given liability protections to pesticide companies.
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
“Did Tom Barrack just slip up about Epstein?”
During a discussion, the former U.S. ambassador to Turkey appeared to make a telling comment tied to Jeffrey Epstein—
and people are now questioning what exactly he meant.
If the races were reversed—a group of white suspects bludgeoning a young Black father to death outside a Chicago bar after he was ejected for his comments—it would almost certainly dominate national coverage from the outlets you listed. Headlines would frame it as a racial hate crime, with extensive analysis of systemic bias, protests, and expert panels.
In this case, with three Black male suspects and one Asian female sought (per CPD and surveillance), it's mostly local reporting plus conservative national outlets. Media patterns show selective emphasis based on whether the story fits dominant racial narratives, not uniform newsworthiness.
Europe and the USA need to understand this.
You are importing the worst of the 3rd world. Those people are not coming to make your country better. They are coming to eliminate you and turn your country into a similar country to the one they fled.
We need to kick them out.
> be Kathleen McCormick
> 2022
> Twitter, Inc. v. Elon Musk
> see that Elon doesn't want to buy twitter due to inflated valuation and bots
> force him to buy it
> self-own, Elon turns it around
> profitable
> saves free speech anyway
>
> 2024
> Tornetta v. Musk
> voids 2018 Elon comp package despite overwhelming support of shareholders
> try to award the lawyers $345 Million
> self-own, Elon gets new comp package worth almost $1T
>
> turns out she was prejudiced against Elon
> shocker
> likes a linkedin post making fun of him
> gets discovered
> yet another self-own
> recuses herself
Ayn Rand predicted this
“When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing… you may know that your society is doomed.”
Rand Paul: "For decades they’ve lied to us. They told us your newborn baby needs an Hepatitis B vaccine on day one, when almost no baby is at risk. That single lie destroyed trust in EVERY vaccine."
Chad O Jackson explains it’s not about skin color, it’s about culture
“Wonder why so many people recoil away from us. They don't recoil away from us because of the color of our skin. That's foolish. They recoil away from us because our culture sucks
And I know that's a lot for a lot of people to take in because we're, we're supposed to be nice. We live in a very PC culture. But you're not gonna get that from me. Our culture, black culture sucks. It just does. Nobody wants to live around it. We have to look at how black culture has put an impression in people's minds that's something they want to get away from, and not something that they want to be associated with. It's 100% cultural
The fact is, black culture today is in such shams that it causes people to recoil away from it.“
He explains how it was not always this way
After last nights and the constant doxxing attempts and threats from people who want to attack me largely due to politicians and leftist hate filled rhetoric as I expose billion dollar fraud schemes stealing from taxpayers
I’ve decided it’s time to raise money for security cost once again unfortunately
You can donate here: https://t.co/jYsNT4Ftjn
If you cannot donate no pressure whatsoever, please like and share this so it can get in the eyes of those that can.
God bless,
Nick
Tucker Carlson asked Joe Kent why the Thomas Crooks surveillance tapes haven’t been released.
Kent’s answer blew him away.
He explained the government deliberately withholds information to create noise with conspiracy theories, so the “actual question never gets answered.”
TUCKER: “The current president was the subject of a near-successful assassination attempt.”
“And we’re just not going to look into very obviously or divulge information that everyone knows they have.”
“For example, the surveillance tape from the shooting range at which Thomas Crooks trained, because it would answer the question, was he training with somebody?”
“And if so, who? They have that footage, and they won’t release it. What could possibly be the explanation for that?”
KENT: “I know what the result is. The result is people come to their own conclusions. And this is where crazy conspiracy theories come from.”
“And then those conspiracy theories usually are easy to ‘debunk’ or make the people saying them sound crazy. So then the actual question never gets answered.”
[Tucker laughs in awe]
TUCKER: “Sorry. Can you say that for people who haven’t lived in Washington?”
“I try to explain this to people all the time because this has been ongoing since at least the Kennedy assassination.”
“But this is a very serious and recurring thing. It’s a tactic. And you just explained it better than anyone I’ve ever heard. Can you just do that again?”
KENT: “So basically, you give no information whatsoever on something that’s obvious, that there should be information.”
“You outlined there’s potentially footage of Crooks at the shooting range. Again, police, 101, go get the tapes. Let’s figure it out.”
“If you don’t want to address that question, then you just go silent. You say, ‘you can’t ask that question,’ which then creates people who come out of kind of nowhere, and they start drawing their own conclusions.”
“Knowing the way the internet works, half of them, if not more, are probably going to be so far off in left field... that then you can just be like, Oh, these people asking these questions about that tape at the video range. Crazy conspiracy theorists.’”
“And so then you’ve just diverted all attention away from the thing that you’re trying to conceal. And now everyone’s focused on the crazies.”
TUCKER: “Man.”
KENT: “And then the second someone asks a legitimate question, they’re ‘crazy.’”
John Oliver reveals Chauvin’s neck restraint was repeatedly used by Minneapolis officers and cleared by supervisors with body cam footage.
If this was common practice, why is Chauvin in prison and his supervisors have not been held responsible?
🚨HOLY COW: After RFK Jr. SUED Fauci for FALSELY claiming it's a lie to say NONE of the 72 mandated vaccines for children have been safety tested did Fauci admit he WAS RIGHT!
“[Fauci’s lawyers] said, ‘Yup! You’re right. We never had ANY STUDY.’”
Follow me: @ItsCarterHughes
I'd like to comment on a little-recognized effect I believe Charlie Kirk’s assassination is having on certain corners of the Right.
About ten years ago, I escaped from living in the SF Bay Area. The outright, visceral, violent hatred that so many Bay Area residents had towards ANY political dissent shocked me when I moved there, and was one of the main reasons I left.
When I moved, I moved to a deep, deep red state. I made conservative friends here. These are nice, decent people who live by a mantra of you leave me be, I’ll leave you be. But what shocked me about them was their unwillingness to believe just how deeply Democrats hate them. I tried explaining to them that most Democrats want them and their way of life dead and destroyed; that Democrats offer no political quarter and will not tolerate dissent of any kind from their neo-Marxist orthodoxies; and that comity is dead on the Democrat side and all they want is power over everything we conservatives hold dear, and that they would do literally anything to achieve and maintain that power.
They didn’t believe me. They said I was exaggerating. They said what I was saying was not possible.
They thought this because they had lived their whole lives in their red state, and in their red state Democrats were far more conservative than the vast majority of Democrats nationally, and in this state Democrats were such a small minority that they were forced to show the comity that the rest of that party long ago abandoned.
My red state friends just assumed this was the same everywhere.
No longer.
Charlie Kirk’s death has galvanized them and made them believers.
Literally millions of peaceful, law-abiding conservatives who just want to be left alone have been woken up and suddenly realize that most Democrats would gladly see them dead.