Daily fantasy sports sold America on a simple argument: skill meant it wasn’t gambling. But that sidestepped the deeper legal question–and helped open the gates to nationwide sports betting.
How DFS became the Trojan horse:
https://t.co/jL5G7Gmh5D
What if fantasy sports were never a game in the first place? Sounds crazy? Hear us out. The hosts question the premise in “We Called It Fun and Games — Ep. 28.”
Listen to this LexBeyond quick hit, then look for our detailed analysis in Full Court Press.
https://t.co/ZwxgWhYD9V
Sydney Sweeney is a piece of the story, she is not THE story. The backlash to @Novig ad is turning controversy into reach–just as @GoDaddy did two decades ago.
https://t.co/srrKROdZZ2
Why the world’s largest futures exchange decided the game isn’t worth the gamble. Episode 27 explores @CMEGroup 's abrupt exit and the rise of retail prediction markets.
https://t.co/8jI9nfUEdZ
The CFTC’s revival of emergency powers marks the latest move in a federal counterstrike that began the moment the agency stepped into the courtroom–and it’s now becoming a constitutional clash over who will get to regulate the prediction markets’ futures.
Prediction markets are facing their most consequential legal moment ever. New York, New Jersey, and the federal government are now colliding over who controls the future of this industry. Here’s how the battlefield is taking shape:
https://t.co/KGSWpQvb5P
Washington Court doubled down on its Kalshi ruling but defined the field incorrectly. This is no longer a sports story. It’s about who gets to control entire categories of markets under federal jurisdiction.
https://t.co/NIRGjtm8EZ
The moment SCOTUS touches prediction markets, the states lose their shield, the CFTC loses its cover, and the country finally learns what happens when a regulatory turf war becomes a statutory one.
https://t.co/PjeUN8SfNY
@bachandler27@WALLACHLEGAL If, and its a big IF, SCOTUS ends up ruling that sports bets are swaps and must be on a DCM... why would CFTC and PMs not sue the sportsbooks for offering illegal swaps? Billions and billions of dollars on the line here.
@bachandler27@WALLACHLEGAL Not true and SCOTUS may end up clarifying this. If Kalshi is right, then sports bets are swaps--which cannot operate outside of a designated contract market, which makes all sportsbooks illegal because they are not DCMs. Some major decisions coming down the pipeline.
@jbfxdotme@WALLACHLEGAL The distinction you’re drawing isn’t the one the law uses. Under the CEA, a “swap” is defined by what the contract is, not by whether you can resell it, whether the price is transparent, or whether the house has an edge. None of those appear anywhere in §1a(47) or §2(e).
@jbfxdotme@WALLACHLEGAL So the issue isn’t whether sportsbooks “feel” like swaps. It’s that if the CEA definition applies, §2(e) makes off‑exchange swaps unlawful, and that would include sports bets. That’s the structural problem the judge was pointing out.