@MichaelBCSSlaw The company who the 43 workers are employed by should be charge as they violated Canadian workplace safety laws by not supplying their employees with the proper equipment to ensure their safety #WorkPlaceSafety#gillieslaw
@chrisguglietti I agree with you that pushing someone off a bridge is #AttemptedMurder but I can see the argument that given the circumstances of the event that happened moments before there my be an argument that it was not intentional to push the man over the bridge #gillieslaw
@nickbcsslaw The jury not being aware of his previous history of crimes is supposed to allow the defendant a #FairTrial (Canadian Charters of Rights and Freedoms section 11). But I think that informing the #jury if the person has a criminal record doesn’t infringe on that persons rights
@JDemarcoLaw Uber shouldn’t be terminated because of what happened. They are a victim with the people who had their info stolen of #cybercrimes. I believe Uber has the intention to protect its users information as evident from them paying for the breached information destroyed #gillieslaw
@nickbcsslaw There is no #AgeRestriction on minors signing contracts currently but parents/guardians have to co-sign if the person is a minor #gillieslaw
The person who pushed the man off a bridge for breaking up a fight but given the situation do you think charging the person with #AttemptedMurder too harsh of a charge? #gillieslaw https://t.co/yViF0ZiMEM
This man committed an #IndictableOffence under the section 130(1) of the Canadian criminal code for impersonating a police officer as well as also committing fraud #gillieslaw
https://t.co/OvdmEHtD9c
Will the expansion of #Lyft in Toronto create another legal battle similar to the one between Uber and the taxi companies? The taxi companies want stricter regulations on ride sharing. #gillieslaw https://t.co/H5T7I8kSB8
@LaurenmacCHA The ruling from the #SupremeCourt is that police officers will now have to obtain a warrant before being able to search through someone’s text messages which is a similar ruling other cell phone privacy cases
This police officer should not have been acquitted of murder. The #VideoEvidence shows that the officer shot an innocent UNARMED man for no reason when the officer has every chance to walk up to the man and just arrested him #gillieslaw https://t.co/6sS1qXIvU8
This landmark announcement will set new and much needed precedents on the issue of #PhonePrivacy and what the police can and can’t access and what can and can’t be used as evidence in court #gillieslaw https://t.co/SVjaHVSpP9
This lawsuit can bring big changes in the fight against #GlobalWarming as well as raise the issue on if the Trump administration has overstepped its legal jurisdiction #gillieslaw https://t.co/Ye56sFDKjK
Reducing smog can save lives, and the Trump administration is failing to enforce U.S. standards, 14 states and the District of Columbia allege in a lawsuit. https://t.co/atJ5Hb56Cq
Should Public servants have the ability to spend #taxpayer money on personal items (office renovations in this case) without approval? What penalties should be implemented to help reduce the amount of wasted taxpayer dollars? #gillieslaw https://t.co/Z1sKUj5chg
@moia_luca If there are any life altering complications that come from this surgery I think that the patient should have the right to #sue the surgeon #gillieslaw
#VW exec. Oliver Schmidt knowingly allowed VW cars to falsify data produced from emission tests while these cars were in violation of the USA's Clean Air Act #gillieslaw https://t.co/jDOodAikBx
With the amount #hatecrimes on the rise should additional laws be put in place to provide safety to the people who are often targets of hate crimes or should the people found guilty of hate crimes face stricter punishment? #gilleslaw https://t.co/j5BfJ3bWYf
If a person is driving under the influence and kill someone should bail be granted or should it be mandatory for bail not to be set? #gillieslaw#MADD#DUI https://t.co/YoprSw3jEQ
This is a landmark case as it will decided whether freedom to express and exercise#religiousbeliefs will allow a person the right to not serve gay people or gay couples in this case #gillieslaw https://t.co/c04YuowPli
That is where John Dowd is wrong, #POTUS is not above the according to #RuleOfLaw and can be found guilty of obstruction of justice #gillieslaw https://t.co/FkfHKIUkFn