The Post below and all others from Lawyers for Justice are 100% correct. It is of great concern and indeed disturbing to observe a number of people who have now jumped on the bandwagon to further mislead and gaslight the Irish People into believing that there is still a chance some new Dail vote will remove the effect of the EU Asylum and Migration Pact. It is too late.Where were these people 2 years ago, when I, Lawyers for Justice and others campaigned VIGOROUSLY to get the Dail to vote against the Protocol 21 opt-in, when there was still TIME before the vote on June 26th 2024.We even endeavoured to have the matter dealt with in the High Court.The only remedy now ( with this current administration) is to seek an exemption from relocation quotas under Article 62 of Regulation (EU) 2024/351 (AMMR) before July 1st on the grounds of significant migratory pressure.Poland has already done thid and was granted an exemption.The reason our Government aka Administration have not done so is very clear as they do not serve the interests of the Irish people, as I have stated publicly many many https://t.co/Xpd3zrXM10 for those out there who genuinely want to help please lobby/campaign for the Irish Government to apply for an Article 62 exemption as stated above.We acknowledge the situation is dire, but campaigning for the wrong remedy is nothing more than a convenient distraction and serves only those who seek the destruction of our beloved country. There are many more benecial campaigns which can be undertaken to restore our Country and our Sovereignty ( e.g.The proposed removal of our Triple Lock ) even if we have suffered a major set back with the Migration https://t.co/QBdSSC4dYR false hope should not be one of them.
They broke his bones, gouged his eyes out, cut out his tongue and castrated him. He died of a heart attack after being set on fire and dragged himself 50 meters across the floor.
On the June 12th this year, the Ireland we know and love will be no more. From that day on we will be just a colony controlled by the corrupt EU elite. Sold out by a traitorous Irish Government. 79 traitors who will be vilified in Irish history. #OptOutNow#EUMigrationPact
Punished for the truth! Brave GP, @indepdubnrth Dr Marcus De Brun, talks about his experience at the hands of the Irish Medical Council during his final hearing, 4th June 2026.
PLEASE SHARE!!
🚨 URGENT: LETTER TEMPLATE TO ENACT PROTOCOL 21 BEFORE THE THE JUNE DEADLINE TO AVOID EU IMMIGRATION RACKETEERING & LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY
Protocol 21 is a legal mechanism attached to the European Union's Lisbon Treaty. It is Ireland’s "opt-in" protocol for EU laws regarding policing, immigration, and justice.
Protocol 21 gives us the choice to opt in or out in EU legislation concerning the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice. Such as asylum, immigration and border policy
Under the protocol, the default position is that we are automatically opted out of any new EU laws in these categories. However, we can "opt-in" on a case by case basis. If the Irish government opts in, it must get approval from both houses of its parliament (the Oireachtas) within three months of the proposal being introduced. Both Ireland and the UK operate under a "common law" system, whereas most of continental Europe operates under "civil law." The protocol protects certain distinct features of Ireland’s legal framework from being overwritten.
Historically, Ireland has aggressively used the protocol to opt into police and criminal cooperation measures (usually around 60% to 70% of the time), but has been much more cautious with asylum and migration laws.
Back in June 2024, the Irish Government voted to opt in to the EU Migration Pact. Because of Protocol 21, Ireland didn’t have to join, but the government chose to do so.
To make this EU pact legally binding in Ireland, the government is currently pushing through the International Protection Bill 2026, which completely replaces Ireland's old asylum laws.
People writing to their TDs demanding that the government trigger Protocol 21 to "opt out" before the June 2026 deadline. By choosing not to use our Protocol 21 opt out, our nation is giving up its sovereignty to Brussels over WHO enters the country.
Because of the "Solidarity Pool" EU countries must either accept a relocated quota of asylum seekers or pay a financial contribution (roughly €20,000 per person they reject) into a central pool (sounds like racketeering) We need the government to use Protocol 21 to avoid these mandatory rules. It is incredibly unlikely this will be enacted. The Dáil already voted to opt in, the European Commission formally accepted Ireland’s participation, and the legal framework is already being locked into Irish law via the 2026 Bill.
However it is worth putting your request on record.
Subject: Urgent: Use Protocol 21 to Opt-Out of the EU Migration Pact
Dear Deputy [TD's Last Name],
I am writing to you as a constituent in [Your constituency/area] to express serious concerns regarding the upcoming implementation of the EU Migration and Asylum Pact on June 12th, 2026.
Under Protocol 21 of the Lisbon Treaty, Ireland possesses a clear legal right to opt out of EU legislation concerning immigration and asylum. I am alarmed by the Government's decision to waive this protocol and voluntarily opt-in to the Pact via the International Protection Act 2026.
By fully implementing this Pact, Ireland is handing over sovereignty regarding borders to Brussels and locking itself into a mandatory system that forces us to either accept set quotas of asylum seekers or face severe financial penalties.
Furthermore, aligning so rigidly with EU migration frameworks risks seriously undermining our Common Travel Area agreement with the United Kingdom.
With only days remaining before the June 11th deadline, the window to act is closing. I am calling on you, as my elected representative, to oppose the implementation of these measures and to publicly demand that Ireland exercises its Protocol 21 rights to retain full, independent control over our own border and asylum policies.
I will not vote for you again should you opt in.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name] [Your Address / Eircode]
𝐇𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲, 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐞𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞.
When Pádraig Pearse spoke of the "Risen People," he wasn't just writing about the past, he was capturing a timeless truth about our capacity to endure, adapt and look out for one another.
True courage isn't something we have to find entirely on our own; it is something we awaken in each other when we stand side by side.
𝐎𝐧 𝐒𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟗𝐭𝐡, The Mise Éire get together is a space dedicated to community resilience, practical self-reliance and mutual support.
We are bringing together hearts and minds to share actionable knowledge, laughs and an opportunity to remember that our collective future belongs to us.
𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐛𝐞 𝐣𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐮𝐬?
Get your tickets here https://t.co/XQVnrOKH99
#TheRisenPeople #MiseEire #Castlebar #CommunityGetTogether #TimeToRise
🇮🇪 🇬🇧 5 to 10 YEARS FOR PEPPER-SPRAY "FIREARM", BUT BLADES FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS OK
A "Compare & Contrast" In Wake of Henry Nowak's Death & Police Response:
In the UK and Ireland, people are increasingly afraid. Diversity crime is exploding. Yet, self-defence sprays are illegal.
In both countries, pepper spray is strictly illegal and classified as an illegal/unlicensed firearm. It is treated with the same severity as carrying a gun, carrying maximum prison sentences of up to 10 years in the UK and up to 5 years (7 years in some circumstances) in Ireland. Yet, in Ireland, Gardaí use double-strength pepper spray on peaceful Irish protesters.
Conversely, in the UK and Ireland, the law allows kirpans (ceremonial blades) in public for "religious reasons". The law dictates that if the blade is used or intended to be used as a weapon, the religious defense is void. SO WHY WAS VICKRUM DIGWA ALLOWED TO CARRY ANY BLADE WHEN HE WAS CAUGHT WITH A STASH OF STOLEN BLADES IN 2023?
He had a kirpan and a 21cm tactical dagger (a Persian knife) and had previously stolen "Shastar" weapons from a local "Gurdwara".
In Ireland, the law does allow carrying a blade for "religious reasons," though the law lacks the explicit statutory language seen in the UK, leaving it to judicial discretion.
The Murder of Henry Nowak:
[NOTE: WHEN POLICE ARRIVED ON SCENE, DIGWA'S FATHER WAS SEEN HOLDING UP HENRY. THIS CAN MAKE A PERSON BLEED OUT FASTER.]
The reality of DEI biases came to light in this case. Vickrum Digwa had a 21cm tactical dagger (a Persian knife), which Digwa said was for "religious purposes".
Vickrum Digwa launched a brutal, unprovoked attack on 18-year-old university student Henry Nowak as the teenager walked home from a night out.
When law enforcement arrived at the scene, institutional incompetence and systemic bias took over. Digwa and his family conspired and weaponised their protected status as a religious community by fabricating a story, falsely claiming that Henry had racially abused Digwa and knocked off his turban.
Rather than assessing the physical reality of the scene (where a young white man, Henry, was bleeding out from five stab wounds, including one to the heart), the responding officers blindly accepted Digwa’s narrative.
Immediately accepting the false accusation of a hate crime, the police treated the dying teenager as a hostile suspect, despite Henry being prone on the ground, clearly suffering, and declaring several times (through blood-filled lungs) that he couldn't breathe and needed help. At one point he said, "Please officer." He also stated he had been stabbed. The officer replied by saying, "I don't think you have, mate."
Instead of receiving life-saving first aid, an unarmed and mortally wounded Henry was DRAGGED ACROSS THE GRAVEL, PINNED, AND AGGRESSIVELY CUFFED (FACEDOWN).
As he lay dying in agony, desperately gasping and covered in blood (the judge noted in court that Henry had blood on his clothing and slit wounds in his clothes), his pleas were entirely dismissed. Meanwhile, another officer could be heard calling an ambulance to treat a minor scratch on the killer.
Digwa's family knew their relative had stabbed Henry and stood around and implicated Henry.
Precious, irreplaceable minutes were squandered treating the actual victim like a criminal. By the time the police finally realised the gravity of Henry's internal injuries and removed the handcuffs, it was too late.
Henry Nowak died as police read him "his rights" during his arrest.
Henry is dead because of a D.E.I. police response that prioritised a fabricated narrative of a non-white Sikh over a young white male who, by all accounts, was hardworking, kind, and inclusive.
He died in agony and fear AND in a state of indignity.
Keir Starmer has said he will not be banning kirpan knife carrying. In Ireland, Gardaí were not allowed to wear turbans until a few years ago. Now they can and, like any Sikh, can carry a blade.
Rest In Peace Henry.
Every sequence carries a hidden structure. Number walls give us a way to see that structure emerge.
I added a new interactive number wall generator to the Physics Monastery site. It includes famous sequences, geometric constants, and custom input.
https://t.co/g9C9NLKE1X
June 12th Ireland voluntarily cedes border control to the EU, disregarding citizens wishes. Do not assume this stays overseas act now to prevent it here. Share widely to defend national sovereignty. 🇮🇪 SHARE
https://t.co/rq4AoDLgCw | 1 June 2026
NO DUBLIN WEST TD ATTENDED TODAY'S VIGIL FOR ALEXANDER COUGHLAN (one TD lives a 20 second walk from vigil and murder location)
By Susanne Delaney
At the time of writing I have found no indication that TDs (one is also a Senior Minister) care that an innocent man was senselessly and callously murdered on their doorstep and I know for a fact not one attended today's vigil.
I understand why they are silent, and quite frankly, it can only be described as inhumanity on top of the inhumanity of those charged with the crime.
Inhumanity from elected politicians who, in my view, place protecting themselves and certain narratives and agendas above being decent and honest human beings. Above the rights of their community and the loved ones left behind after Alexander Coughlan's untimely and tragic departure from this world. A world he occupied peacefully.
In the case of GREEN PARTY TD (and ex minister) RODERIC O' GORMAN this inconceivably cruel crime took place LITERALLY on his doorstep -just 20 seconds walk away from his home.
PEOPLE BEFORE PROFIT'S RUTH COPPINGER apparently offered scant and meagre sympathies around 5 or 6 days after the initial attack that resulted in Mr. Coughlan ultimately losing his precious, rich and meaningful young life (he was just 37). There was no outrage. No protests. No action called for. The brief and alleged (she has me blocked) condolences were, seemingly, borne out of cynical self serving political box ticking.
Conversely, Coppinger immediately went on social media in the wake of Congolese man Yves Sakila's death. She stated conclusively that he was "killed" in a racially motivated crime. Yves Sakila's autopsy was inconclusive and toxicology tests have been ordered. The results will be forthcoming in a few weeks.
This doesn't seem to matter to Coppinger, nor does the pertinent established facts around Yves Sakila's lengthy criminal career and the elderly man whose hip he broke, and there may well be far more to Sakila's death than excessive force.
But facts and ongoing investigations be damned. She has had a Sakila vigil and protests to organise. Appropriating future votes from the imported BAME community takes effort you know? Quite literally speculating (and misleading?) to accumulate.
I'd like to add I take NO pleasure in Yves Sakila's death whatsoever, but what happened to blameless Alexander Coughlan was inarguably vicious murder. Yves Sakila, was not murdered, and it was not racially motivated (some of the security were foreign themselves).
It is worth noting, Coppinger had no issue intently appropriating votes from the Castleknock Community, despite her communist views on affluence. She gained a seat in Castleknock as a councillor in the local elections, prior to her winning a TD seat later that same year.
FIANNA FAIL MINISTER JACK CHAMBERS also appropriated many votes from Castleknock as did Leo Varadkar replacement FINE GAEL'S EMER CURRIE. All three of these people are FROM Castleknock but, as far as I can tell, have had no word to say about Alexander Coughlan who lived there.
Chambers was too busy at Golf Charity match. As for Emer Currie, she appeared from no where to take a seat that was left primed for her to step into. She has not been seen or heard from since and perhaps should be reported as missing in in "IN-action".
Lastly SINN FEIN'S PAUL DONNELLY is also silent. Donnelly, like Coppinger, was vocal in the aftermath of George Nkencho's death. Armed Nkencho was shot by Gardaí after he lunged at them with a knife. Nkencho had been the perpetrator of a robbery and assault that took place at a supermarket in Hartstown, Dublin 15 earlier in the day. Following his death, there was outrage amongst the black community. Violent protests followed in which staff at the supermarket were targeted (and had to lock themselves in) as well as people in the local community.
Everyone should DEMAND answers from these TDs. I will post contact details in comments.
Bertie Ahern on his immigration comments : " I don't think there's anything wrong with talking about what the people are talking about."
"If you mention an issue the people are talking about and you're jumped on, that's a sad day for speech."
⚠️ UPDATE: warning, distressing details. Pathologist conforms in court that bruising was found in the back of 13 month old Preston's throat, which discredits Jamie Varley's claim that Preston drowned while left alone in a bath. The Pathologist also confirmed there was evidence of sexual assault occurring shortly before or during death. The accusation is that the child had something (an object or body part) inserted in his mouth which caused him to experience asphyxiation (suffocation) which in turn led to cardiac arrest.
I have always said Direct Drmocracy is the only way forward for Ireland. Especially when we have leaders hell bent on bowing to the EUs every whim. Those same politicians would sell us out for any brown envelope.
BREAKING: Shocking scenes as Enoch Burke denied justice and forced out of Appeal Hearing by prison officers
Enoch Burke’s mother Martina Burke and brother Dr Isaac Burke were also removed by police.
At the start of the Disciplinary Appeal Panel hearing, which is by law an “informal” hearing, Enoch Burke objected to the presence of a top Employment Barrister as well as a Solicitor from a major Dublin law firm.
Despite Enoch Burke’s repeated objections, the Chair of the Disciplinary Appeals Panel, Claire Callanan said to Mr Burke: “We may be wrong and you may be right but we are going ahead nonetheless.”
Barrister Barra Faughnan BL and Solicitor Fiona Sheil of Mason Hayes & Curran Solicitors were acting for Wilson’s Hospital School at the hearing in Athlone today.
The presence of lawyers at such an appeal is contrary to settled law and Department of Education procedures for dealing with appeals.
Enoch Burke has now spent over 650 days behind bars after refusing to use they/them pronouns for a student.
These are the third Disciplinary Appeal Panel proceedings in relation to Enoch Burke that have ended in shambles.