💥 Follow for daily updates | NO digital-id | Defend free speech, privacy in AI era | Join freedom revolution! | #LibertiesDaily#Fight4Rights | DM tips/collab
A new lawsuit has been launched against The Walt Disney Company over their rollout of facial recognition technology at the entrances of Disneyland Park and California Adventure in Anaheim, California
The lawsuit says Disney violates privacy, consumer protection, and competition laws by not properly disclosing the biometric data collection
The suit argues most guests, including kids, have “no idea” this sensitive data is being collected, and an opt-out lane isn’t the same as informed, explicit consent
Disney’s response is the claims are “without merit.”
Let me tell you, there claims have merit. I’ve personally gone to Disneyland and seen these new facial recognition cameras. Nowhere is it clear that you can opt out and nowhere is it clear there is an option to go to a line without them
For any average guest they seem very mandatory
You shouldn’t have to give your biometric data to Disney, for any time period
WATCH THIS. This made me choke. Made me feel sick.
Henry Nowak. 18 years old. Walking home from a night out.
He saw a man carrying a massive knife in a sheath. Filmed him. Henry said, You're a bad man for carrying that knife in public. The man said back, I'm a bad man. Then stabbed him. Four times. Henry bled to death in the street.
When police arrived, the man who stabbed him said Henry had been racist to him. So POLICE HANDCUFFED HENRY, NOT THE ATTACKER, WTAF.
The kid who was bleeding out and died. Arrested him for racism. While the man who stabbed him walked free and his mother removed the weapon.
Henry wasn't racist. He filmed a man carrying a knife and said he looked like a bad man. That's it. That's what got him stabbed. That's why police arrested him while he died.
Richard Donaldson brought this. Filmed it from his car. Couldn't believe what he was seeing.
Where was the news?
BBC Local News Hampshire reported it. ITV Meridian reported it. Regional. Buried. That's it.
BBC News? Nothing. Sky News? Nothing. Channel 4? Nothing. GB News? Nothing.
National news blackout. Complete silence. George Floyd? International Weeks of coverage. Statues torn down. The world stopped.
Henry Nowak? Local news only. Court reporting. Nobody knows. That's why you didn't hear about it. National news didn't tell you.
How is this allowed?
Religious exemptions for ceremonial knives. Special rules for some. But Henry? No protection. Just stabbed and arrested while dying.
How do we have one rule for religious communities and another for British kids?
Why is a ceremonial knife more protected than an 18-year-old's life?
Henry's dead. The attacker's on trial. National news said nothing.
That's two-tier Britain. Media silence. Protected knives. Dead teenagers. And you weren't told.
This is what Starmer's Britain looks like.
If it wasn't for Richard's video I wouldn't know about this. Thanks to someone in the UK actually bringing this to my attention. @RDonaldson91@GBNews@BBCNews@SkyNews@Channel4News@ITV
Shame on you. Shame on you all. One of us is taken. One of our young lads. Somebody's son. Could've been your son.
@TRobinsonNewEra Unconscionable.
I am happy to fund a wrongful death lawsuit against these disgusting excuses for law enforcement. They damn well better have been fired.
I will not adopt Digital ID
I will not use a Carbon Wallet
I will not accept CBDC
I will not adopt an internal passport
I will not allow my documents to be tokenized
I will not surrender my privacy for artificial safety
I will not drive a car with a kill switch
I will not abandon physical media
I will not submit to a social credit system
I will not surrender national sovereighty
I will not surrender bodily autonomy
We may disagree with the politics of Reform and @ZiaYusufUK, but as campaigners we have always stood against the Online Safety Act for precisely this reason: its dangerously vague scope inevitably results in the weaponisation of content moderation and censorship.
When the Conservatives introduced this draconian legislation, spearheaded by Nadine Dorries and shamefully supported by Labour, those politicians were either hopelessly naive to its implications or secretly hoped they would always be the ones benefitting from this arrangement.
Social media platforms, including TikTok, are, whether we like it or not, the modern public square. It is absolutely not the place of Big Tech companies to act as the arbiters of political discourse. Every party has the right to propose their policies - no matter how much we may personally disagree with them - and for them to face scrutiny from the public, who will deliver their verdict at the polling booth.
We hope that one day Labour MPs will come to realise the extent of the damage the Online Safety Act has done to freedom of speech online.
We shall continue to fight against it and champion digital freedom for all.🌹
@LabDRN@ZiaYusufUK "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Evelyn Beatrice Hall (Voltaire's biographer)
In 458 BC, Rome was on the brink of collapse.
An invading army had trapped the Roman consul and his legion in a mountain pass. Panic spread through the city. The Senate did the only thing they could think of:
They sent messengers to find a 60-year-old farmer plowing his field.
His name was Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus. He had once been a senator, then lost his fortune paying his son's bail. Now he worked his own four-acre plot just to feed his family.
When the Senate's envoys arrived, they found him sweating behind a plow. They asked him to put on his toga so they could deliver an official message.
The message: Rome was making him dictator. Absolute power. Total command of the army. No checks. No oversight. No term limit.
He accepted.
Within 16 days, Cincinnatus had raised an army, marched out, surrounded the enemy, and forced their surrender. The republic was saved.
He had legal authority to rule for six months. He could have stayed. He could have expanded his power. He could have done what every other ruler in human history did when handed unlimited control.
Instead, he resigned on day 16.
He took off the toga, walked back to his farm, and finished plowing the field he'd left half-done.
Twenty years later, when Rome faced another crisis, they called him back. He was 80 years old. He took command, crushed the conspiracy, and resigned again, this time after just 21 days.
He died poor. On his farm.
2,200 years later, when George Washington was offered a kingship after winning the American Revolution, he refused and went home to Mount Vernon. The reason he was hailed as "the American Cincinnatus" is because Europeans literally could not believe a man who had won would willingly give up power.
King George III, on hearing Washington would resign rather than rule, said: "If he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world."
The lesson isn't that Cincinnatus was humble.
The lesson is that for most of human history, the people most qualified to lead were the ones who didn't want to. And the moment a society starts rewarding those who chase power instead of those who flee from it is the moment the republic begins to die.
Cincinnati, Ohio is named after him.
Most people who live there have no idea why.
Activist: "You can graze sheep underneath solar panels. It's called agrivoltaics."
Farmer: "I've read the brochures."
Activist: "Best of both worlds."
Farmer: "The panels shade the sward. Productive species die back. What grows is what tolerates shade and compaction. Sheep won't finish on it."
Activist: "But the trials show it works."
Farmer: "The trials run three years and measure ewe presence. Not lamb growth rates. Not finishing weights. Not what the soil looks like in year fifteen."
Activist: "It's still better than nothing."
Farmer: "It's a 30% stocking rate, a steel frame I can't plough around, panel-cleaning chemicals running into the watercourse, and a 40-year lease I can't break."
Activist: "But you're getting energy AND lamb."
Farmer: "I'm getting a third of the lamb, a maintenance contract, and a field my grandson can't farm."
Activist: "You're being negative."
Farmer: "I'm watching a thousand-year-old way of feeding people get traded for twenty-five years of subsidised electricity. Negative would be the polite word."
They’re trying to get @X banned before 2027, because there are elections coming up in France and they don’t want @J_Bardella to win. They need to silence patriotic voices and control the narrative.
That’s always what these attacks on @elonmusk and X are actually about.
@SpeechUnion This is the start of a very dangerous slippery slope. Unless people refuse and resist, we'll all soon be living in a dystopian digital dictatorship where there's total surveillance and control.
https://t.co/AR8sQjX1mj
DIGITAL ID: "Let’s put our political differences aside and fight for everyone’s freedom, be there on the 25th of April" @RoryFreedom
"During COVID, we united to fight the mandates, and we won, we can do the same again with Digital ID"
🗓️ Sat 25th April - 1:30pm meet for 2:00pm start
📌 London (Trafalgar Square), Edinburgh, Cardiff + Belfast
📢 Spread the word, share this far and wide
Stronger #together
🚨 ARTEMIS II ASTRONAUTS SPILL THE BEANS
Reid Wiseman just dropped some raw details from the historic Moon mission:
- The Orion toilet had a clogged vent line that limited “urine events” (NASA speak for having to pee) and turned waste into crystalline problems in space.
- A smoke alarm suddenly went off 80,000 miles from Earth during reentry prep, things got tense fast.
- The crew was moved to tears seeing the far side of the Moon — the first humans in this generation to witness it that way.
Despite the hiccups, Wiseman said they could strap Artemis III on the rocket tomorrow and the crew would be ready to fly.
They launched as friends and returned as best friends. Pure American excellence.
God bless these heroes