Roughly 70% to 75% of the world's population lives in a country where a single ethnic group forms an absolute majority.
If you stand against "ethnostates," can you at least define what one is?
@lemon_logger3@BenjaminPDixon To the contrary, my core point is that Jews did not commit mass murder and steal the land in the first place. But your tiny brain is not able to comprehend that because you’re a knuckle-dragging drooling antisemite.
@lemon_logger3@BenjaminPDixon Jesus was a Jew. In fact, he self-proclaimed he was "King of the Jews." And that's not my argument at all. You're just too hateful and stupid to see it.
Have a nice life.
@lemon_logger3@BenjaminPDixon And nowhere did I say it's fine for Americans to be genocided by Chinese. Lol. I was just rebutting your asinine argument.
I didn't say it was - though there is an argument that it is under uti possidetis juris (look it up). But I support a two state solution. My point is that there is no Palestinian partner. Palestinians have not raised up a Mandela or Gandhi for leaders - they've raised up only Sinwars and Arafats. And that's no accident.
You asked my ethnicity. I declined. So you assigned me one, then wrote that shooting people like me would be justified. That is the whole thread.
Your 3% is a number from the early 1800s, when the entire territory held about a quarter of a million people. It was an emptied Ottoman backwater, and Ottoman tax records say so. Jews were a plurality in Jerusalem by the 1870s, decades before the European immigration you're blaming. Safed, Tiberias and Hebron had unbroken Jewish communities the entire time. Nobody "arrived." Some came home.
There has never in history been a sovereign Arab Palestinian state. Not one. Not under the Ottomans, not under the British, not for a single day. Partition offered the Arabs sovereignty they had never once possessed, and they turned it down and invaded. Azzam Pasha, Secretary-General of the Arab League, said publicly what the war was for: a war of extermination and a momentous massacre. That is not self-defense.
In Haifa in April 1948, the Jewish authorities publicly appealed to the Arab population to stay. The British recorded it. The Arab Higher Committee told them to leave instead, on the promise they would return behind victorious armies. Those armies lost. Losing a war of annihilation you started is not a deed to the country.
Then the Arabs expelled 850,000 Jews from Baghdad, Cairo, Tripoli, Aleppo and Sanaa. Communities older than Islam, gone, property confiscated. Half of Israel's Jews descend from them. They didn't sail in from Europe. They were driven out of Arb capitals by violence and had exactly one place to go.
Now about that Chinese boat analogy. You're posting it from Boston. Nobody in your bio is indigenous to Massachusetts either. The difference is that Jews returning to Judea were returning to the only place they ever came from, which is more than your ancestors could say when they landed here. And the man on the cross in your avatar was a Jew from Judea. You've spent the afternoon arguing his people are foreign to it.
You are a deeply lost soul.
@lemon_logger3@BenjaminPDixon I do not divulge personal information on X. Ever. If whether you believe an argument hinges on someone's religion, then you're already off-base. These are all facts. Just look them up yourself.
“Gays for Gaza” might be the stupidest movement ever.
They're marching for Gaza, while every single gay who ever lived in Gaza was either thrown from a roof or shot to death.
Fucking idiots.
So now destroying buildings – because they have all been booby-trapped and conceal combat tunnel shafts – is "genocide". These people are absolute jokers.
That's a laughable characterization. Jews were not late arrivals who showed up and demanded a piece of someone else’s country. Jewish people lived in that land continuously for more than three thousand years. Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed, and Tiberias were Jewish cities long before the imperial Arab conquests of the seventh century. Continuity of Jews in that land is the historic record. Israel is the Jewish homeland, where the Jewish people are from - like the Irish are from Ireland and the French are from France. The Hebrew people are from Israel.
The territory was never an independent Arab Palestinian state. It passed through Roman, Byzantine, Islamic, Crusader, and Ottoman rule, then the British Mandate. Under the Ottomans and the British, the land was state land, absentee-owned, or thinly populated. Zionist settlement before 1948 was built overwhelmingly on legal purchase by absentee landlords - not on sudden confiscation of a finished nation. Much of the land was actually malaria-infested swampland and unarable. It's actually an amazing story to read how the Jews turned that land into thriving cities and centers of commerce - ironically drawing massive Arab migration (from Egypt, Syria, Lebanan, and Jordan) to the area in the early 20th century.
In 1947 the UN proposed partition based on population dispersion. The Jewish side accepted a state on a minority of the Mandate, including large stretches of desert. The Arab side received the vast majority of arable land but nonetheless rejected the plan and, the day Israel declared independence, five Arab armies invaded to wipe the Jews into the sea. That was the war. The displacements of 1948 happened inside it.
Calling that sequence “Jews arrived and pushed Arabs off land they had lived on for a thousand years” erases Jewish history, erases the legal purchases, erases that Arabs never had sovereignty to begin with, erases massive Arab migration to that are because of the economic boom, erases the rejected partition, and erases who started the war. Losing a war launched to abort another people’s independence does not rewrite the preceding three millennia. The accurate framing is that both Jews and Arabs have deep roots to that land and when the British Mandate was expiring, it was a contest between competing two nationalist movements - Jewish nationalism and Arab nationalism. Jewish nationalism allowed for peace and the side-by-side existence of a soverign Arab state. The Arab nationalism rejected any notion of Jewish self-determination and fought war after war to end it.
“I think that Israel is more than just a punching bag for some of the challenges that America is facing"
Haley Stevens, who narrowly lost the Michigan Senate Democratic primary last month, has shared her thoughts about the role Israel plays in US politics today.
“There is this bizarre obsession that has reached pitch level with calling out one country, one tiny country in the Middle East,” she said.
For her views, she's paid a political price. “I was booed off my convention stage. I was chased out of a labor event in Detroit.” She said “heightened bullying” is becoming routine.
"Why can’t we have a Jewish state? And there’s become this anti-Zionist hate and this assumption that this is colonial."
"It is not. It is just people in their homeland trying to live.”
You clearly get your information from Chinese TikTok. The Nakba means “disaster” in Arabic. In 1948, Arabs (before they called themselves Palestinians) rejected the two state 1947 UN Partition Plan and when Israel accepted it and declared its independence in 1948, 5 Arab armies attacked Israel to wipe it off the map. Yes, the Arabs began an actual war of genocide and ethnic cleansing. But they lost. As a result of that war, about 750k Arabs were displaced (not killed, as you said). Again, they were displaced as a result of a war THEY STARTED. Because they lost the Arabs call it a disaster.
As to why it’s not a genocide, I refer you to my original post which you should re-read more carefully.
https://t.co/9qAKaYq2zs
https://t.co/XqC3QZDwCc is an activist archive, not a tribunal. It shows casualties of war. A genocide charge is a claim about intent to destroy a people as such. No genocide in history turned on an enemy that could end the fighting by surrendering and releasing hostages, on roughly two million tons of aid being facilitated to the same population, on that population’s rulers having opened the war with a massacre, or on civilians being warned beforehand by leaflets, phone calls, texts, maps, and roof knocks. Those are the habits of a military trying to separate fighters from noncombatants, not of a campaign designed to erase a people.
The casualty pattern points the same way. A civilian-to-combatant ratio under 3:1, against the 9:1 figure cited by the UN itself for urban war, is evidence of restraint under the worst conditions of modern combat: tunnels, human shields, and civilian infrastructure used as fortresses. Warnings and a comparatively low ratio do not make every death less tragic. They do make the accusation of genocide absolutely ridiculous, though.
John Spencer of West Point’s Modern War Institute and the High Level Military Group, a panel of senior NATO military officers and former commanders who embedded with the IDF, inspected targeting and aid procedures, and reviewed operational records, have categorically rejected the genocide charge. Blaming “Jews” for a state’s war against Hamas is also collective guilt. Graphic footage documents a ferocious urban war. It does not document genocide.
🚨 THE DEMOCRATS: PRO-ISRAEL JEWS OUT — FORMER BERNIE SANDERS AIDE EXPOSES CRISIS WITHIN U.S. PROGRESSIVE POLITICS
Joel Rubin, Bernie Sanders’ former Jewish outreach director and a longtime progressive Democratic activist, says Democrats have reached “a crisis moment” as parts of the progressive movement impose an ideological test on Jewish Americans.
“Oppose Israel, and you’re in. Support Israel, and you’re out.”
Rubin says Sanders and his allies have “shaped a political environment that’s deeply hostile to any Jewish person who cares about the State of Israel,” arguing that Jews are increasingly pressured to abandon support for Israel to remain accepted in progressive politics.
“That is inherently antisemitic,” Rubin said.
Rubin warns the trend goes beyond political disagreement: “Anti-Zionism is no longer one position among many in the Democratic Party. It has increasingly become the boundary marker separating the politically acceptable Jew from the politically suspect one.”
He says the objective is “a deliberate attempt to politically marginalize Jews” and ultimately weaken Jewish advocacy for Israel within the Democratic Party.
“The way it gets that done is by trying to intimidate Jews in the Democratic Party to be silent and afraid.”
His warning to Democrats: “No political party is healthy when it kicks out the Jews.”
@JNS_org
Israel Derangement Syndrome is when you obsess over a foreign nation so much that you end up supporting someone sympathetic to Jihadist terrorists simply because they hate Israel as much as you do.