@weredorf@Awk20000 I’m not sure what point you’re trying to ooze out. Are you arguing that mundane actions can have tertiary effects that cause harm to others?
@weredorf@Awk20000 I’m not even sure if you’re baiting at this point lol. The stance of “do not take conscious action to purposefully kill an innocent human” is not a hard rule to live by
@weredorf@Awk20000 worth to an unborn baby moments away from being born, and a newborn. But even if they didn’t, that does nothing to argue whether that’s a reasonable stance. We as a society used to not place the same personhood on black people. If you were to argue against that stance I couldn’t-
@weredorf@Awk20000 Furthermore, you can’t simply say you aren’t defending morality and then give a list of moral standards you’re defending. Utility and mercy are not separate from morality
@weredorf@Awk20000 Maybe refer to what the discussion is about rather than shifting the goalpost. We are referring to asmon’s stance that abortion up to 9 months is fine. You have offered no defense as to why that is moral but infanticde isn’t, rather you have pivoted to “that doesn’t happen”
@weredorf@Awk20000 This is what we call a distinction without a difference. Passing a few inches through a birth canal doesn’t warrant a change in kind relating to its moral worth