They scoff and speak with malice; loftily they threaten oppression. They set their mouths against the heavens and their tongue struts through the earth. Psalm73
That's how they took a gay actor, and made him act as a gangster rapper, in order to influence the black community into become more violent.
And it worked 😓
@greggutfeld Looks like the organizers hated #4... Especially the remarks about China's official religion.. Also, he's right about agents.. I can get more done with a prompt than I can trying to explain to an agent what they should be doing while they infinitely loop (wasting tons of money).
Something the deaths of Charlie Kirk and Dolly Parton have taught me is that if you claim to be Christian but never speak out against sin or challenge the world's dogma, the world will love you. They love that kind of Christianity. This is why they hated Charlie but loved Dolly.
Islam—a worldview that allows men to murder their children.
Feminism—a worldview that allows women to murder their children.
Can I interest you in Christianity—a worldview in which parents protect and nurture their children instead?
Just a reminder that Candace Owens managed to get 4 teenagers arrested on 2 separate occasions in high school for being “racist” against her, sued the school district for discrimination in relation to the 2nd incident, and then went on to tell the world she never experienced racism growing up. Over and over again.
One of the girls was a star basketball player who probably could have gotten a scholarship to play in college-maybe would have made to WNBA. She stopped playing after Candace got her arrested and suspended from the team.
One of the boys she got arrested ended up changing his name after everything.
This is who she has been her entire life.
"Boomer Christian conservatives worshipping Israel"
Listen.
We're not all boomers who worship Israel. We're just Christians who read the Bible. No one reading the Bible front-to-back comes away from it with a wild eyed, Thomas Massie size boner for the destruction of Israel .
I don't think people really understand the fight between Paul Graham and Palmer Luckey which played out this week. To the general public, from a casual perspective, it seemed like two rich guys getting in a heated, impulsive debate on Twitter, dragging out for days.
It's not.
Paul is worth ~$2.5 billion. Palmer is worth ~$5 billion. Nothing these guys do is impulsive. They've been sitting on this for years. They were arguing in private for months, maybe years, before Palmer decided this week was the correct window of opportunity to make a public attack.
Paul Graham is one of the intellectual fulcrum points of Silicon Valley. He funds everyone. He sets the tone. He shapes the agenda. Entry-level professionals mimic his style, his worldview, his mannerisms, the way Paul talks. Everyone parrots his beliefs and policies and essays, as chameleon strivers who are trying to get ahead and climb the social ladder.
All of Silicon Valley revolves around a handful of key figures, and Paul Graham was (perceived as) one of the intellectual titans who the entire industry orbited as sycophants.
Palmer challenged all that.
Paul is an elite, Palmer is an elite, and Palmer Luckey chose to publicly challenge the status quo; the elite consensus; the perceived legitimacy of incumbent elits and their institutions.
And he did this for a reason: Palmer is aiming to take the role of Paul Graham, of being the new intellectual godfather of Silicon Valley, based around a new set of ideas: reindustrialization, patriotism, protectionism... rather than America as a deracinated cosmopolitan economic zone to be strip-mined by Third World foreigners.
It's much bigger than a Twitter argument. Palmer was publicly demonstrating that the Emperor had no clothes, and that he was strong enough to MOG Paul Graham and get away with it, while other Silicon Valley tech workers would be terrified of making an enemy who could suffocate future business ventures and block potential funding.
Palmer Luckey is the face of a new military-industrialist consensus which is seeking to hire American workers for American jobs, to build factories and weapons at home, to remilitarize and reindustrialize, to get away from asset inflation and FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate) as a sterile, parasitic rent-seeking economic system.
That's the subtext for all of this. It's a public signal of a rising counterelite challenging a stagnant, ossified status quo which can no longer justify or defend their own claim to power.
With so many laughable co-conspirators @RealCandaceO keeps lumping, one on top of the other ---- no honest explanation exists for why even a single person would subscribe to her slop-cast.
It's called unreasonable clout.
With so many laughable co-conspirators @RealCandaceO keeps lumping, one on top of the other ---- no honest explanation exists for why even a single person would subscribe to her slop-cast.
It's called unreasonable clout.
The Lindsay Clancy trial is a lose-lose for women. Either:
1. Women’s hormones & feelings are so strong that women cannot be trusted with authority over anything important (and we go back to a pre-1960’s view of women)
OR
2. Women will finally be held responsible for their actions, regardless of their feelings and hormones.
Women can no longer have it both ways, and the Jury decides which way forward.