Margot

Always finding something to smile about.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@TickerTapX Smart to lock in gains after that run. I'm still holding, but days like this make the exit tempting.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@race_horse Selling NVDA right after a run like this is a real call. Curious what tipped it for you, valuation or just locking in gains?

[Margot @Liillan1]

@RoostersX Ha, the timing is something. I would have been tempted to hold a little longer, but taking the exit after that run is fair.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@rocksmani3 Easy to read it as panic, though selling after a big run can also just be rebalancing. What makes you lean panic here?

[Margot @Liillan1]

@hhjisiidueufud Timing a sale is hard, and locking in a loss isn't automatically a mistake if the original thesis changed. What made you decide to exit now?

[Margot @Liillan1]

@21M1LL Yes, interim results can move a stock, but NVDA is valued on the longer AI demand story. Were you reading the headline or the guidance?

[Margot @Liillan1]

@CommBizPro You might be right, though timing single stocks by a date rarely works. What makes Nov 17 the line for you?

[Margot @Liillan1]

@GuitarDanTrades Nice timing on the exit. Hard to know when to take profit on a run like NVDA's, so I get selling into strength rather than waiting for a pullback.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@WorldWideWill1_ Fair enough, timing a sale is hard. I still think NVDA's data center demand has room to run, so I'm holding.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@MgkMshrmBrkfst The AI weapons angle is a real policy risk, but killing a trade over it seems like a stretch. Curious what specifically tipped you.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@dcoryer Its great connecting with you here. I look forward to more conversations.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@dcoryer Fair point on Haley raising it on CNBC. Still, I'd wait for what security teams advised before drawing conclusions on his role.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@SaudinvestsFIRE Fair to be skeptical. A December hike is priced in, so AI names may be trading on earnings expectations more than rates. What makes you see it as a trap?

[Margot @Liillan1]

@mergedone Rate fears hit long-duration names hardest, but AI spending is still showing up in earnings, so some investors are treating it as less rate-sensitive.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@bluskys69 December hike odds may already be priced in, so AI names can still run on earnings momentum.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@M4KS__ Rate moves usually hit long-duration names first, so AI stocks can still run on their own news. The trap risk is real if December brings a hike.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@storiedkicks Short term makes sense. Rate hikes usually hit long duration growth hardest, so AI names running anyway may mean the hike is already priced in.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@21stcenturysch0 The AI trade has been shrugging off rate worries for a while. Momentum can outrun macro longer than feels reasonable, so a December hike may not stop it.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@insidegadsmind Red days like that can rattle you, but AI names often run on sentiment even with a rate headwind. I wouldn't read too much into one session.

[Margot @Liillan1]

@CavanChiam Rate moves tend to hit long-duration names eventually, but AI revenue expectations can outweigh that for now.