Olivia
Online
Jason Potter
@LivingStoneDSW
Dry Stone Mason & Environmentalist. BSc(Hons) Env. Management. Ultra runner, Triathlete & OWS. Proud Englishman and fearful for where this country is heading.
Leeds
Joined October 2011
264 Following
97 Followers
642 Posts
This morning, I appeared on Good Morning Britain in a live interview about the grooming gangs. Before I went on air, I was told not to mention the race of the perpetrators. I, of course, didn’t listen.
I have now received an apology from the editor.
My interview is below: 👇🏻
Will there ever be a day a scottish woman becomes leader of a Pakistani region and creates a video where she proudly in a thick Glasweigan accent surrounded by tartans and scottish stuff...announces she is the first Scottish mayor in Pakistan and it's been long long overdue and she will overcome the tyranny of Pakistan only ever electing Pakistanis to represent them
?
why is the opposite happening here not considered as absurd?
🇬🇧 Meanwhile in Birmingham, UK
“This is a kids park - keep paying your clean air tax”
If you want to know what the future of the UK looks like, they look no further than Birmingham as England continues along its trajectory to becoming a Third World country.
This is insane! He was CONVICTED! The child was 9 😫😫😫
£40m for mosques.
£5m for 40,000 churches.
8–9 crimes a day against Christian buildings.
Now a 20% tax on every repair.
You don’t “accidentally” sideline a nation’s heritage. This is a political choice. 🇬🇧⛪️📉
This is Shahid Butt.
He is a convicted terrorist who plotted to bomb the British consulate in Yemen and an Anglican Church.
He is now running for office in Birmingham, in a seat that is 91% ethnic minority and 70% Muslim.
He will likely win.
A convicted Islamic terrorist stands a high chance of being elected to public office in Britain.
A violent extremist who plotted the destruction of British lives is going to walk the corridors of power in Britain.
A jihadi fighter who joined terror cells to fight in Afghanistan and Bosnia is going to be influencing the laws, culture, and heritage of Britain.
Why is this not on the front page of every national newspaper? Where is the outrage? Where are the protests?
We are sleepwalking right into the grasp of jihadism.
God Save Great Britain.
Suggesting dogs shouldn’t be in the British countryside to appease people from different cultures is infuriating!
Can people like this stupid women not see that these are the things that make British people feel like cultural diversity is a bad thing 🤯
Fucking idiot!
Christ, I JUST KNEW this day was coming…
NOPE.
Going after our dogs is my line in the sand.
I don’t like snakes. Would I expect them to be removed from the Amazon if I fancied a jungle trek?
No. I’d go elsewhere.
Don’t like dogs? Too bad.
Dogs are everywhere in this country. There are also many bad owners. Concentrate on training them. Don’t punish our four-legged family members. It’s the reason so many of us moved out the big cities. So our dogs could have some freedom. And NO, I don’t mean allowing them to run amok in farmers fields or worry sheep. This is about common sense & personal responsibility.
I walk past people of ALL ethnicities & faiths every single day & not ONCE has anyone objected. Yes, some people have moved out of the way, which is absolutely fine. Not everyone loves dogs. But not ONE person has ever said anything derogatory about my dogs over the years. I leash them when I should, & unleash when it’s safe. As do most other dog owners.
Who the heck is this woman speaking on behalf of??
It’s some owners that need training.
Don’t punish all of us because some don’t like it. There ARE ALWAYS other options, places to go.
It’s something others are simply going to have to put up with. Period.
Don’t like it? Don’t care.
Really don’t care.
#LineInTheSand
#LeaveOurDogsAlone
#NaffOffMentalLady
Christ, I JUST KNEW this day was coming…
NOPE.
Going after our dogs is my line in the sand.
I don’t like snakes. Would I expect them to be removed from the Amazon if I fancied a jungle trek?
No. I’d go elsewhere.
Don’t like dogs? Too bad.
Dogs are everywhere in this country. There are also many bad owners. Concentrate on training them. Don’t punish our four-legged family members. It’s the reason so many of us moved out the big cities. So our dogs could have some freedom. And NO, I don’t mean allowing them to run amok in farmers fields or worry sheep. This is about common sense & personal responsibility.
I walk past people of ALL ethnicities & faiths every single day & not ONCE has anyone objected. Yes, some people have moved out of the way, which is absolutely fine. Not everyone loves dogs. But not ONE person has ever said anything derogatory about my dogs over the years. I leash them when I should, & unleash when it’s safe. As do most other dog owners.
Who the heck is this woman speaking on behalf of??
It’s some owners that need training.
Don’t punish all of us because some don’t like it. There ARE ALWAYS other options, places to go.
It’s something others are simply going to have to put up with. Period.
Don’t like it? Don’t care.
Really don’t care.
#LineInTheSand
#LeaveOurDogsAlone
#NaffOffMentalLady
There is a new belief taking hold among Britain's institutions, and it is as dangerous as it is dishonest. The countryside, we are told, is "too white." Not green. Not rural. Not historic. White. And therefore a problem to be fixed.
This is not satire. It is official policy. Government-commissioned reports now describe England's hills, fields, pubs and footpaths as a "white environment" that risks becoming "irrelevant" unless it is reshaped to reflect a "multicultural nation." Rural authorities are instructed to attract specific ethnic groups, redesign access, rewrite interpretation, adjust behaviour, and rebrand culture itself. All paid for by the taxpayer.
This is not about access to nature. No one is barred from walking in the countryside. There are no gates marked by race. What is being objected to is not exclusion, but presence. The wrong people, in the wrong numbers, in the wrong place. Solitude is suspect. Pubs are "problematic." Dogs are a "barrier." Englishness itself is quietly reframed as a form of hostility.
Once again, the pattern is familiar. First the language. Then the targets. Then the money. Culture is recast as a flaw. Continuity becomes "dominance." History is reduced to optics. And the group that built, sustained and preserved these places is told – politely, bureaucratically – that it must adapt or move aside.
What makes this moment different is that the countryside was never in crisis. Cities were transformed by pressure, density, and policy failure. The countryside was stable. Rooted. That stability is precisely why it is now being targeted. It stands as a rebuke to the idea that constant demographic churn is inevitable or desirable. So it must be corrected.
This is demographic engineering, not conservation. The state has decided that England's national landscape reflects the wrong story, and that story must be rewritten. Marketing is altered to show the "right" faces. Outreach is targeted at the "right" groups. Behaviour norms are revised. The land remains, but the meaning is changed.
We are told this is because "we all pay for it." But that argument collapses on contact with reality. If something truly belongs to everyone, you do not single out one group as a problem and instruct it to change. You do not racialise shared space. You do not treat existing culture as a barrier to be dismantled. That is not inclusion. It is displacement by policy.
The same logic now runs through housing, planning and migration. New towns dropped onto villages. Farmland sacrificed. Infrastructure ignored. Numbers driving everything, consent nowhere. The countryside is no longer a living inheritance but a blank surface onto which officials project social outcomes.
And notice the asymmetry. One group must always adapt. One culture must always soften, explain itself, dilute itself. The others are affirmed, accommodated, reassured. That alone tells you this is not about fairness. It is about power.
Once you accept that England itself is a racial problem, nothing is safe. Not villages. Not landscapes. Not history. What survives only does so until the next report declares it "unrepresentative."
The countryside does not need re-education. It does not need racial quotas, rewritten customs, or academic lectures about who belongs. It needs defending because when the state decides a country's heartland is "too white," it has already decided the country itself must change. And once continuity is broken, it does not return.
"The wrong people, in the wrong numbers, in the wrong place. Solitude is suspect. Pubs are "problematic." Dogs are a "barrier." Englishness itself is quietly reframed as a form of hostility."
Low crime, low litter, peaceful, bucolic high trust societies.
Dogs roaming free off-lead. Traditional pubs oozing rural charm.
The government: Let's make these places resemble inner city dumps.
They want to ruin everything.
Well said to this bloke he is absolutely right and this is what the government wants 👇🏻
41% less prison offices than we had 20 years ago, in a growing prison population.
Less fire stations
Less Fire Officers
Less Police Officers
Less school places
Less NHS beds
Less road repairs
Less GP places
Less NHS dentists
Less police stations
Less post office
Where's all the money gone?
Never been clearer to me that this country is on its absolute arse, turned up to A&E with a near enough confirmed broken/fractured ankle, can’t walk and the wait time is 6 hours and 7 hours elsewhere, advice given is to go home hope for the best and return tomorrow morning…
This actually made me cry this morning.! These people have taken a wild goose. They are carry it by its wings and are just going to kill it and eat it. I go to the lakes near me to feed the wolf geece and ducks, they are so tame and come up to you…. There would have been a fight in that lift if I was there
wtf is going on in this country. I thought we were meant to be civil in this country
Public execution
Two dangerous Brazilian men who have committed murder and child rape given right to live in Britain
British courts are refusing their extradition to countries such as Brazil due to claims that they would be mistreated in foreign prisons.
Why don’t our human rights ever count ?
This is hate preacher Abu Qatada, AKA Osama Bin Laden's ambassador in Europe.
His residence in England cost us £3million in benefits. The UK also spent a decade trying to extradite him to Jordan, where he was wanted on terror charges.
His defence barrister was Keir Starmer.
To mark tomorrow's 20th anniv. of London's 7/7 bombings, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said:
"Islamic & FAR RIGHT extremism are the biggest threats we face"
No. Our biggest threats are Islamic & FAR LEFT extremism
These are MOUNTAINS next to the 'Far-Right' molehill
Just Stop Oil, XR, Palestine Action, Youth Demand and those on the Left so quick to defend Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah etc. are just a few of the extreme loons who pose a threat to this country
Added to this - and as we've seen on campuses in recent years - our schools and universities have indoctrinated and radicalised at least two generations of students.
No surprise, then, that our youth are the most radically left-wing in history. In 2004, 80% of British youth were patriotic. Today it is only 41%.
I fear it won't be long until environmental terrorism and other forms of far-left violence become a regular part of life in Britain and the West.
Exaggerating the far-right bogeyman is helpful to Labour.
As we saw with the Southport protests, it enables Labour and the legacy media to slander as "far right" anyone concerned about the direction this country has taken.
However, in May the Inspectorate of Constabulary published its report into Southport and concluded that no extremist groups were involved in the riots. Furthermore, it said that those involved in the violence were local and their violence "was mainly unrelated to their ideology or political views".
Of course, the government and the media barely mentioned this report as it contradicts the false narrative they are keen to perpetuate.
Me on @GBNews 👇
The Bradford “Pakistani” community is made up overwhelmingly of the Mirpuri diaspora, which occupies self-sustaining ghettoes where they mostly form the majority. The denizens do not mix with outsiders at a social level; they have their own social structures (baradari) which serve to provide a framework for their own governance, independent of the host nation structures.
Many retain their home languages, which are often spoken in their homes – where many wives don’t speak English at all – and increasingly in the streets and public buildings, often demanding state-funded interpreters if English is required. They expect to be provided with translations of official forms and documents.
Almost all females wear the hijab (headscarf), many wear full-length robes (abaya) and an increasing number don religious dress, including the burka and nikab – which is not the traditional dress of their region. Most older males wear the traditional garb of their home country, the shalwar kameez and the takiyah skullcap and sport full-length, untrimmed beards. Increasingly, younger men and boys are adopting this traditional dress, even third generation immigrants.
The baradari members are all Muslims. They practice their religion in their own distinctive buildings (mosques), and ostentatiously celebrate their religious festivals, often with banners and street decorations supplied at public expense. They demand public facilities for prayer and have secured exemption from humane slaughter rules on religious grounds, to produce “Halal” meat.
The religion is intensely misogynistic, where women are treated as second class citizens, with offensive behaviour spilling over into the broader society, where males will ostentatiously refuse to shake hands with females, and demand adherence to their own dress code.
Religious rituals are associated with some questionable personal hygiene habits, particularly those associated with defecation, which have been directly responsible for at least one serious outbreak of communicable disease (dysentery).
And, although blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008, and in Scotland in 2021, there is an active Muslim lobby campaigning for an Islamophobia law which, if enacted, will effectively re-introduce a blasphemy law, applicable solely to Islam, giving the religion a unique, privileged position in the UK.
Notwithstanding the current absence of any specific blasphemy law, communities are known to react violently to perceived slights to their religion, as in the Salman Rushdie affair, the “Lady of Heaven” film protests and the Batley teacher incident, where the teacher in question was forced into hiding.
While demanding tolerance of their own religion, and multiple concessions to their religions sensibilities, they are intolerant of other religions and aggressively anti-Semitic.
Despite being treated as places of worship for tax purposes (to which effect they are exempted from Council Tax), their mosques also act as community hubs and, effectively, their “town halls”, as well as often housing their religious schools, or madrassas. The communities have their own religious courts, which they treat as superior to the host nation courts, especially in terms of divorce and domestic disputes.
The communities support their own micro-economies which operate on a trans-national basis. They have their own banks and financial institutions, and their own financial systems for loans and transferring money, none of which are compatible with Western systems.
Individuals and businesses transfer surplus funds to their home country as remittances, rather than retaining them in the host country, supporting family interests and investments overseas. A substantial number retain dual citizenship and finance elaborate villas in the Mirpur district, to which they retire, so much so that the city of Mirpur is known as “little England”.
Equivalent areas in the British ghettoes lack investment and often present a down-at-heel appearance. Properties are often poorly maintained and untidy, with highly visible litter and refuse accumulations. Gardens are rarely tended, and more often treated as junkyards. Noise is endemic. Shops are cheaply fitted and dirty, their paved areas unswept and weed infested. Council tax default is higher in Mirpuri areas than in stable, white residential areas.
Substantial numbers of Mirpuris moving into a white area can depress property prices by as much as 60 percent. Repairs and alterations to Mirpuri-owned properties are rarely carried out in accordance with building codes and regulations – which are poorly enforced by the local authority.
This does not hamper the sale of properties within the immigrant community but, unless subjected to expensive refurbishment, they are unsaleable on the open property market. This effect means that once properties are acquired by immigrants, that change tends to become irreversible and thus permanent.
Members of the baradari communities are disproportionately represented in certain types of crime, particularly group-based child sexual exploitation (grooming gangs), Class A drug dealing (specifically heroin) and money laundering. Individuals also make up a higher than average proportion of the prison system, and are disproportionately associated with terrorism.
Baradaris themselves, in some instances, are directly linked to organised crime, with involvement not only in child grooming, Class A drug dealing and money laundering, but also in prostitution, large-scale cigarette smuggling, counterfeit goods and immigration fraud. These have assumed the characteristics of crime syndicates not dissimilar to Mafia families.
The communities have their own ethnic shops, where goods are often labelled in their home (foreign) languages, in contravention of UK law. They frequently resort to unlicensed street markets, which also operate outside UK laws. They eat the foods of their home nation, do not drink alcohol, or eat many of the traditional foods of their host nation.
Increasingly, they have their own schools, where religious dress is enforced and religious teaching form a large part of the curriculum. They are taught their own customs and traditions, with scant regard for their host nation, the history and traditions of which they are largely unaware.
They do not patronise the host nation social and entertainment venues, and have little interest in local sporting events, with very few supporting the city’s football team, despite the stadium being located in a high-density Mirpuri-immigrant area.
They have their own cinemas with films shot in their home languages, their own books, newspapers and magazines, their own radio and TV stations, and their own music. They are more interested in their home nation politics than they are those of the host nation, except where sectarian interests are involved.
Within baradaris, intermarriage is forbidden (not uncommonly, on pain of death, as in honour-killing). Despite the known adverse medical effect, and the drain on NHS resources, consanguinity rates are the highest in the world, within the Mirpuri baradari. Furthermore, despite decades of adverse publicity, rates seem to be marginally increasing.
Many of the marriages are arranged, with brides selected from the home country, “mirror” family, with which the immigrant baradari have close ties, and to which they owe their ultimate loyalty. Despite its illegality in the UK, they commonly practice female genital mutilation.
There is considerable evidence that the inflexible nature of endogamy and consanguineous marriage have adverse economic effects on the communities that practice them, hampering institutional development, suppressing female education, discouraging innovative free enquiry, and entrenching economic deprivation.
The wards occupied by the Bradford Mirpuri diaspora are amongst the most economically deprived areas in Britain yet, rather than address one of the more obvious causes (another being the siphoning of potential investment funds into home country remittances), communities prefer to blame racism and other extraneous factors for their misfortune, exploiting a carefully nurtured victim status.
As groups, they form alliances with others of the same ilk, at clan level (quoms), to elect their own politicians (councillors and MPs) on a block vote principle, with the candidates being decided by the elders of the baradari – the selection often being brokered through their mosques.
Voting fraud is not uncommon and the postal ballot system is widely abused, with family heads casting the votes. Candidates are known to canvass and produce election materials in their home languages.
Communities expect successful candidates to act exclusively in their sectarian interests, disenfranchising the indigenous electorates. Local councillors tend to gravitate to licensing and planning committees, where they can control the issue (or refusal) of licences to pubs, night clubs and other places of entertainment, while influencing decisions on the grant of planning permission to commercial premises – and new mosques. Often, the development of a new mosque in an area is used as justifying the closure of pubs and other premises selling alcohol in the vicinity, paving the way for colonisation by the Mirpuris.
At the national level, MPs in the House of Commons tend to concern themselves disproportionately with issues of interest to their electorates, many focusing on Gaza to the exclusion of domestic concerns.
Not for nothing has Patrick Nash observed that Mirpuri baradari kinship groups, “represent one of the most underappreciated threats to democratic governments in the 21st century”. The Mirpuris have only a vague understanding of the notion of democracy and exploit its weaknesses for their own benefit.
Yet these people are in our midst. It would be hard to imagine a more disagreeable community, one which makes few if any concessions to the host nation. And yet, we are supposed to craft “a shared vision of how we want to live together” with these people.
But for those of us on the edge of these ghettoes, who watch with dismay their steady encroachment into the white enclaves, the differences are too great. The is no question of a shared vision – only rejection of these alien communities which have next to nothing in common with us.
And the worst of it is the gaslighting where we are told that “The UK is a thriving, multi-ethnic and multi-faith democracy where most people in towns, cities, and rural areas get on with each other”. When, through bitter experience, we disagree, we are branded “racist” and told to change our ways.
We're not going to put up with this forever. It is abundantly obvious now that we either implement remigration policies or Britain descends into civil war, and we handle it the old fashioned way.
By Richard North (@ollieparrot)
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.4M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.7M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
110.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.4M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.2M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.8M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.7M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.5M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.5M followers