I'm demanding a special session to MAKE BIRTH TOURISM A FELONY!
And I'm calling on Texas HHSC to STOP GIVING BIRTH CERTIFICATES TO NON-CITIZENS!
Texas must act like the sovereign state we are and fight SCOTUS's disastrous birthright citizenship ruling.
@Bannons_WarRoom
🚨 Did you know? 🚨
No federal judge has a lifetime appointment—because “lifetime appointment” is NOWHERE in the Constitution!
🔎 Article III, Section 1 says judges hold office only “during good behavior.” That means their position is conditional—not guaranteed for life!
Yet we’ve reached an age of judicial absurdity where we’re rebuked for questioning judges—when the Constitution demands it!
The REAL scandal is that we’ve been deceived into thinking we’re powerless. We are NOT powerless! But deception keeps us silent.
📺 Watch this video NOW and learn WHY questioning federal judges is our Constitutional duty!
🔥 It’s time to wake up, speak out and Demand Congress Act according to the Constitution! 🔥
👉 If this makes you as furious as it makes me—arm yourself with the truth and the tools to take action at https://t.co/LMNVsIsNGK!
#ConstitutionMatters #JudicialAccountability #GoodBehavior #LibertyFirst #QuestionFederalJudges
Attention: Tomorrow the Texas House will be taking up HR3 the "housekeeping resolution" and there is a brand new power grab for Speaker @Burrows4TX on page 15.
The housekeeping resolution is typically a mundane organizational matter that sets office budgets but it has been increasingly politicized in recent sessions. Last session, a routine amendment to codify existing rules on political use of legislative resources was warped to justify a ruling blocking a vote on Democrat chairs. Unless preempted, that type of nonsense, underhanded tactic can be expected again.
But beyond that, there is a new power grab on page 15 of the resolution. The new language would give Burrows the unilateral authority to hire an attorney to file lawsuits on behalf of the House. This authority currently, constitutionally, resides with the House as a body. The expected and normal course would be for the House to adopt a resolution authorizing litigation, setting out the objectives of the litigation, and authorizing the hiring of an attorney to represent the House.
This new authority undoubtedly arises from the @leachfortexas / Robert Roberson debacle. As you'll recall, Leach filed several lawsuits in the name of the House of Representatives. I still generally assume that was authorized by @DadePhelan (but maybe not?) and regardless, when I pored over the statutes and the current rules and housekeeping resolution, there was no clear authority for the speaker to authorize litigation. Especially given long interims (and the apparent consensus - I disagree - that the House cannot call itself into session for institutional purposes), this is a topic that is worthy of careful consideration
Given that it is rare for a single chamber of the legislature to be involved, on its own, as a litigant, this is authority that will almost only arise in highly charged litigation involving multiple branches of government and disputes over core constitutional interpretation (as the Roberson debacle was). As a reminder, Texas already has statutes governing how and when litigation can be initiated on behalf of the "legislature." So this would only come into play when the House itself, but not the Senate, is at issue.
In my opinion, this new language fails for one core reason (and several smaller ones).
The first core reason is that it is silent on who sets the objectives of litigation.
It would seem that authority would either be inherently vested in the speaker alone under this text, or even more perversely, in the attorney that he has appointed. As I said, right now, the whole House would be required to adopt a resolution to authorize litigation. (Assuming proper protocols were followed -- they were not in the Leach/Roberson debacle). This new language would give that power away -- either to Burrows or to his attorney.
The smaller concerns are about the timing.
Is Burrows going to appoint an attorney to represent the house (like a general counsel, essentially) for the duration of the term? If so, why not make that appointment subject to approval by the body? Even then, how would that attorney know when he should file something or not? Who is the boss?
If this is meant only for an emergency, then why not say so? If it is only for use in an interim, some short-term limited authority might make sense. But why is there no accountability on the initiation of litigation? Is there no role for at least the House admin committee to sign off? There are other provisions in the rules about action in the interim that could be drawn from, and this proposal does none of that.
So, what can we do? It's time to fight back. We must stay engaged. Pressure your county GOP to #censure them under Rule 44. Track their votes. Recruit a challenger. Educate voters. Kick em to the curb in the next primary as an example for all. Here are the traitors:
You won't believe the latest developments in the race for TX Speaker!
The latest conflict impacts every grassroots activist & Republican, & it comes from w/in the party, initiated by a Republican State Representative.
Don't miss this podcast!
https://t.co/QSemRf5D89
Lt Gov @DanPatrick nails it!
20 selfish, rogue House Republicans (out of 88) believe they’re more important than the will of millions of Texas Republican voters
This unholy alliance of 20 Republicans and 60 Democrats is a slap in the face of all Texas Republicans.
#TXLege
#ReformTheHouse
As promised, here's the urgent podcast @TrueTXProject produced with @TweetTonyMac and @abrahamgeorge this weekend regarding the latest shenanigans surrounding the Texas Speaker race. It's ugly... and it affects YOU.
My favorite lines:
"This is vicious."
"That's why we built the True Texas army."
Check it out on your favorite platform:
Youtube:
https://t.co/n2HoZ1IuyE
Rumble:
https://t.co/O1hxNpLeVU
Spotify:
https://t.co/fA6OaNDRL3
Apple:
https://t.co/OCDYwzUcvh
After you watch, post your thoughts in the comments, and share it on social media. Let's get the word out!
Agreed! We've only won an opportunity to change direction, by the mercy & grace of God (and much prayer!) This is not the time to kick back; keep awake and stay engaged!
And be thankful for the opportunity—
Gratitude will be key...
My counsel to everyone who reads this, listens to what I say, or gives a sh!t what I do, last nights victory was historic (YES!), but as in warfare, this was only the beginning of the long slog to achieving total victory.
The best analogy is that we have seized the beachhead and have broken through the hedgerows into Normandy. I want everyone to understand, we have not achieved a “VE Day”, we are more like D-DAY+1. We have our beachhead, the troops are arriving in strength, with determined purpose, and a clear mandate.
But now the real work of rooting out the evil infestation really begins. Removing the infiltrators, the bureaucratic systems and processes that infect decision making and do nothing to protect the safety and security of the American people along with many bureaucrats who wish nothing but ill will to our arriving troops.
Sorry, not this time Obama. Fool us once, shame on us, try to fool us again, shame on you.
Making America Great Again is our marching order and #WeThePeople are on the move.
Lead, Follow, or Get the Hell Out of the Way!
Tucker Carlson's Monologue On Why Biden Has No Intention Of Fixing The Border Crisis
"So waiting under the bridge in Del Rio tonight is the Democratic party's future electoral majority. That's what it really is & that's why they're protected so they can do whatever they want."
We really need your help to Keep Chloe in Class!!
Can you please retweet / share to your networks!?! And would you please consider a donation, if you're able? Thanks so much!!! https://t.co/5UBopyrC11