Complete insanity in the United Kingdom. The calls for @Keir_Starmer to be immediately removed for allowing this once great nation to go into the toilet are not only righteous but necessary.
Henry Nowak may he R. I. P.
. @BarackObama needs to get more than a grand jury subpoena, he needs to be tried with grand conspiracy to commit treason against the United States of America!
Enough is enough!!!
@realDonaldTrump
Gabbard’s July 17, 2025 “Coup” Document Release: Allegations of a “Treasonous Conspiracy”
Tulsi Gabbard, as Director of National Intelligence, accused Obama-era officials of orchestrating a plot against Donald Trump. On July 17, 2025, DNI Tulsi Gabbard publicly released declassified documents and a press statement showing that former President Barack Obama and his top security officials engaged in a “treasonous conspiracy” in 2016 to undermine Donald Trump’s election victory.
In her press release, Gabbard charged that after Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, Obama and key members of his national security team “manufactured and politicized intelligence” to falsely suggest Russian interference swung the election. She described this as laying the groundwork for a “years-long coup”aimed at subverting the will of the voters and illegitimately removing or hampering Trump’s presidency.
Gabbard’s statement points to the debunked Steele dossier as a central piece of fabricated evidence that Obama’s team knew was bogus but used anyway. She emphasized that this issue “concerns every American,” casting it not as a partisan matter but a fundamental betrayal of our democracy. Gabbard vowed that “every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law” to ensure such an abuse of power never happens again. To that end, she announced that all the relevant documents were being provided to the Department of Justice “to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve” .
Key Documents and Evidence Released
Gabbard declassified a trove of intelligence documents, emails, and memoranda from 2016–2017. These files, along with a DNI “Russia Hoax” memo and timeline, detail how the official narrative of Russian election interference was contrived by Obama-era officials. Below are the key documents.
Pre-Election Intelligence Assessments (Mid-2016): The newly released records show that before the November 2016 vote, the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) found no sign of Kremlin intent to alter the election outcome. For example, an August 31, 2016 DHS memo to then-DNI James Clapper reported “no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count” . Similarly, a September 2016 interagency analysis (circulated via the President’s Daily Brief process) stated that “Russia probably is not trying…to influence the election by using cyber means” against U.S. voting infrastructure. On September 12, 2016, the IC even published a formal Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on cyber threats to the election, judging that “foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks” on U.S. election systems. (Two days later a near-identical PDB report concurred that adversaries couldn’t “covertly overturn the vote outcome”.) Notably, when DNI Clapper and DHS publicly announced on October 7, 2016 that Russia was behind the hacking of DNC emails, that press release omitted the truth: that within the IC, the FBI and NSA had only “low confidence” in attributing those email leaks to Russia.
In sum, prior to Election Day 2016 the consensus of U.S. intelligence was that Russia was not interfering in any way that could change votes or hack voting machines.
DNI Clapper’s December 7, 2016 Talking Points: Shortly after Trump’s victory, intelligence officials still saw no evidence of cyber meddling with vote tallies. The documents include talking points prepared on Dec. 7, 2016 for outgoing DNI James Clapper, which state unequivocally: “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. Presidential election outcome.” The talking points also confirm “we have no evidence of cyber manipulation of election infrastructure intended to alter results.” These were draft lines for a Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) reflecting the IC’s post-election findings. In fact, Gabbard’s release includes the text of a declassified PDB dated Dec. 8, 2016 (prepared by DHS with input from CIA, NSA, FBI, etc. for President Obama) which concluded: “We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.” The PDB noted that while Russian-linked hackers did breach an Illinois state voter database and attempted intrusions in other states, it was “highly unlikely” any cyber attack could actually change vote counts or outcome.
In other words, as of early December 2016, official intelligence channels were reporting no successful Russian disruption of voting – directly contradicting the alarmist narrative that was about to emerge in public.
White House Meeting and “POTUS Tasking” (Dec 9, 2016): A pivotal document in the release is the summary of an NSC Principals Committee meeting held at the White House on December 9, 2016. President Obama himself convened this high-level meeting in the Situation Room with his top national security deputies present. According to the “Summary of Conclusions” memo, participants included DNI James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, NSA Adviser Susan Rice, Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe (representing FBI), and other key figures. The topic was Russia. Immediately after this meeting, DNI Clapper’s executive assistant sent an email to IC leaders with the subject “POTUS Tasking on Russia Election Meddling.” In that email (now declassified), Clapper’s aide relayed that President Obama had ordered a “comprehensive assessment” of Russian interference in 2016. The IC was directed to “pull together”all available information on “the tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election,” with ODNI to lead the effort “per the President’s request”. The email makes clear this was Obama’s directive: “The IC is prepared to produce an assessment per the President’s request… ODNI will lead the effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.” It also set a target date of January 9, 2017 for a highly classified report to President Obama, with an unclassified version to follow . This extraordinary White House tasking, coming one month after Trump’s win, shows the effort to generate a new Russia–Trump intelligence report was explicitly initiated by Obama and coordinated at the highest levels.
Suppression of a Contradictory Intelligence Report: The declassified emails reveal that, just as Obama’s team was requesting a new Russia interference assessment, they buried intelligence that didn’t fit the narrative. On December 8, 2016 (one day before Obama’s meeting), ODNI and DHS officials had been ready to publish a PDB item documenting that Russia hadn’t affected the election. An email from a DHS intelligence branch on Dec. 8 noted “due to high Administration interest, this piece is now scheduled to run tomorrow” — fast-tracking the report that concluded no cyber impact on the vote. However, within hours, the FBI – led by Director James Comey – abruptly withdrew its cooperation. The FBI, which had co-authored the draft PDB, notified the others that it “will be drafting a dissent” and asked to remove FBI’s name from the report. Following this, a senior ODNI official emailed that, “Based on some new guidance, we are going to push back publication of the PDB… It will not run tomorrow and is not likely to run until next week.” In fact, it never ran at all. The post-election PDB concluding Russia “did not hack” the election was killed internally . These communications – featuring Comey’s FBI signaling disagreement and unnamed higher-ups issuing “new guidance” to quash the report -demonstrate that contrary intelligence was deliberately suppressed. Gabbard’s investigation shows the evidence that Obama’s circle stifled the truth (that Russia hadn’t altered the outcome) in order to pursue Obama's political narrative.
Media Leaks Shape a New Narrative: Immediately after the Dec 9 NSC meeting, Obama-era officials began secretly feeding a counter-story to the press. Gabbard notes that on that very day, Washington Post reports cited anonymous “senior officials” claiming that Russia did meddle in the election through cyber means. One WaPo article on Dec 9, 2016 asserted that “this presidential campaign marks the first time Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election, attributing this to U.S. intelligence officials.
Later the same evening, the Washington Post ran another bombshell leak: that the CIA had a “secret assessment” concluding Russia intervened specifically to help Trump win. These false claims were coming straight from unnamed insiders (“Deep State officials,” as Gabbard puts it) even though no official IC assessment at the time supported such conclusions.
In the following days, the leaks continued to flow. By Dec 14, NBC News – again citing intelligence sources – reported that the IC now believed “with a high level of confidence” that Vladimir Putin was personally involved in the covert operation to interfere in the election. And on Dec 16, President Obama, in a press conference, ominously talked about potential Russian cyber mischief (while admitting there was “no evidence of vote machines being tampered with”). All of these statements were at odds with what the actual intelligence had been saying internally. The declassified files underscore that Obama officials fed the media a false narrative: claiming Russia had tried to sway the election outcome, contrary to the IC’s own pre- and post-election analyses. This coordinated leaking framed the public perception in December 2016, setting the stage for what followed – the formal intelligence assessment and the years-long “Russia collusion” investigations into Trump.
The January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment: The culmination of Obama’s tasking was a new Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released just two weeks before Trump’s inauguration. This ICA – published on Jan. 6, 2017 – directly contradicted the IC’s previous six months of findings. It accused Putin of ordering an influence campaign to hurt Clinton and help Trump, concluded that Russia hacked Democratic Party emails and provided them to WikiLeaks, and generally lent weight to the claim that Russia’s actions aimed to assist Trump’s victory. Gabbard’s declassified records expose serious credibility issues with this ICA. According to ODNI investigators, the Jan 6 assessment was “politicized”: it “suppressed intelligence from before and after the election showing Russia lacked intent and capability to hack the 2016 election.” In other words, evidence that Russia didn’t intend or manage to affect the vote (which we now know abounded in mid-2016 IC reports) was omitted or minimized. The ICA also misled the public by implying that the IC had not assessed the impact of Russian interference on the outcome. In reality, as Gabbard’s memo notes, the IC had assessed impact – the unpublished December PDB had clearly stated Russia “did not impact” the election via cyberattacks. Thus, the new ICA gave the impression that the question of whether Russia affected the result was unanswered, when internal intel had answered it in the negative. Moreover, the Jan 2017 ICA’s content was skewed in other ways: it blamed Russia for the DNC and DCCC email hacks and leaks “with high confidence.” But the released documents show that within the IC, both FBI and NSA actually held “low confidence” in attributing the DNC/DCCC hacks to Russia – a crucial nuance that was omitted from the public report.
Most explosively, Gabbard confirms that the ICA’s key claim of Putin’s pro-Trump motive relied on “further information” that had “come to light” post-election – which turned out to be the discredited Steele dossier. In other words, the only new element that emerged between the pre-election intel (showing no Russian attempt to help Trump) and the post-election ICA (claiming Putin wanted Trump to win) was the Steele dossier’s allegations. Gabbard’s team found that this dossier was used in the Obama ICA’s conclusions. Former DNI Clapper himself had reportedly viewed the Steele reports as “untrustworthy,” yet top officials (e.g. CIA Director John Brennan) pushed to include them. Obama’s intelligence chiefs knowingly injected dubious information into a high-stakes national intelligence assessment, casting grave doubt on the ICA’s integrity. The Jan 6 ICA provided the official basis for the “Trump-Russia” investigation narrative, it was the product of deliberate manipulation – a cornerstone of the alleged anti-Trump conspiracy.
The documents provide a chronological narrative from mid-2016 through early 2017 showing that intelligence findings were inverted in the service of a political objective. Each piece – from early DHS/FBI emails, to the White House meeting summary, to the leaked media quotes prove that Obama-era officials coordinated a deliberate effort to falsely tie Trump’s win to Russian interference, thereby undermining his legitimacy.
I’m not in Congress yet.
But I’m already working for Rhode Island.
I am a founding member of the Great American Health Alliance, helping build a healthcare model that puts healthcare dollars back in your hands.
I have identified a specific solution to Rhode Island’s energy crisis. A fully permitted natural gas pipeline in Connecticut was stopped by political pressure years ago. Finish that pipeline and energy costs come down for Rhode Island families and businesses.
I traveled to Miami on Cuba’s Independence Day and met with some of the most influential Cuban American business and civic leaders in the country.
Then I went to Cuba myself to develop relationships, find willing partners, and better understand the opportunities ahead.
My goal is simple: when Cuba’s $100 billion economy is looking for trading partners, I want Rhode Island manufacturers, shippers, and entrepreneurs at the front of the line.
I have called for One Big Audit and watched every week as another billion dollars in waste, fraud, and abuse is uncovered, proving exactly why it is needed.
This is what representation looks like before the election.
Imagine what it looks like after.
Rhode Island First. 🇺🇸
— Vic Mellor
Obama-appointed judge Cooper is part of the Deep State
Cooper in effect stopped the only Russiagate prosecution Special Counsel Durham was able to proceed with
Then Durham got shut down by Monaco/Goodlander
I know Derrick Evans. I have met his wife and his beautiful children. The first time we met was at CPAC, when he told me his story, he sobbed and my heart broke. He told me how after he got home from prison, his boys cried even if he went out to get the mail. They thought he was leaving again. 😢💔 These stories are never heard, and I hope he doesn't mind me sharing it with you, but FAMILIES were damaged because of Jan 6, and many families (like mine) will NEVER RECOVER.
ICE just arrested a Salvadoran national in Providence with pending felony sexual assault charges.
According to ICE, he was taken into custody during a targeted operation and has a criminal history that includes a pending felony sexual assault case.
This is exactly why Rhode Island must cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.
Public safety is not political.
Every family deserves safe neighborhoods. Every victim deserves justice. And every dangerous criminal here illegally should be removed before another innocent person gets hurt.
When I'm in Congress, I'll stand with law enforcement, support secure borders, and put the safety of Rhode Islanders first.
Rhode Island First. 🇺🇸 Vic Mellor
Mark Warner has been involved in a ongoing, treasonous conspiracy against President Trump for a a decade.
Warner coordinated with anti-Trump, Hillary and Soros-sponsored British intelligence operative Christopher Steele, Soros-Hoffman sponsored Dan Jones and others.
New DNI @pulte should refer Warner for a criminal investigation
🚨 NBC just said the quiet part out loud on live TV:
"They'd need a flood of ballots coming in the wee hours of the morning to lift both Democrats above Republican Steve Hilton."
California elections, folks. Where election results always seem to require some last minute magic from the midnight ballot fairy.
Nothing to see here... just another totally normal Tuesday night in the Golden State.
No matter where you live, confidence in elections starts with transparency.
Every legal vote should be counted. Every safeguard should be enforced. Every voter should know the process is fair and secure.
Trust isn't demanded. It's earned.
And Rhode Islanders deserve nothing less.
🇺🇸 Rhode Island First. — Vic Mellor
British spy Christopher Steele, who executed the anti-Trump operations for Obama and Clinton was codenamed CROWN by the FBI, implying that the “intelligence” came from the British Government, was reliable and apolitical.
This was done to provide cover for Obama.
CROWN was paid in British pounds by the FBI, according to the recently declassified files.
In fact, the “intelligence” was fabricated by Brennan’s CIA and passed to Steele by CIA operative Stefan Halper.
Clinton-appointed Judge Brinkema, who threw out my case against CIA anti-Trump spy Stefan Halper, with John Brennan named as the co-conspirator, knew Halper and Peter Strzok, as per Strzok’s text messages.
MITCH=Halper's FBI codename, refers to a fictional CIA operative Mitch Rapport who was paid off-the-books to avoid congressional oversight just like Halper.
Halper was the key FBI "informer" for the Crossfire Hurricane operation, ran by Peter Strzok.
The texts suggest that Halper, self-professed China "expert" was supposed to brief Brinkema on China counterintelligence threat ahead of her travel to China.
However, given the dates: one day before Hillary signed off the plan to link Donald Trump to Russian intelligence, and 6 days before the opening of Crossfire Hurricane by Strzok, and Halper (MITCH) crucial role in it, it seems these text messages are a cover for something else.
Note the discussion of the FISA Court as well, they were already planning to spy on the Trump campaign before they even opened the FBI investigation.
June 2016 text messages show that FBI Deputy Dir Andrew McCabe conspired with his British counterpart Jeremy Fleming, MI5 Deputy Director to prevent the "similar outcome" to UK's populist movement which resulted in Brexit, to election of populist candidate Donald Trump in the US